/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13321899]

>2019
>He thinks being an atheist is edgy

[Anonymous No.13321903]

>>13321899
"In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god's blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence."- Plato

[Anonymous No.13321907]

>>13321899
>He thinks a fedora is cooler on theism because he calls it a Mitre

[Anonymous No.13321913]

>>13321903
the great quotemaker!

[Anonymous No.13321937]

>>13321899
This.
Fedoratipping and euphoria was for the contrarian edgelords of 2013.
It will be cool here again in lets say five years

[Anonymous No.13321955]

>>13321899
It's not "edgy", it's correct. Fact!

[Anonymous No.13321958]

>>13321913
why do they seethe so much
that sub is an impotent’s safe space

[Anonymous No.13321967]

>>13321903
Plato was the Amazing Atheist of antiquity.

[Anonymous No.13321977]

[Anonymous No.13321991]

>>13321955
>>13321959

[Anonymous No.13321997]

>not being an apatheist ignostic
Come on now

[Anonymous No.13322001]

>>13321977
lmao

[Anonymous No.13322015]

>ridiculing people for differences in ideology

[Anonymous No.13322027]

>>13322015
>implying there's something wrong with this

[Anonymous No.13322039]

Catholicism is the new edgy grim dark belief. Not in structure and belief obviously but in the type of 4chan user who follows it

[Anonymous No.13322116]

>>13321977
a madman and a hero
anything that triggers normies is good

[Anonymous No.13322131]

>>13322116
>a madman and a hero. anything that triggers normies is good

[Anonymous No.13322133]

>>13322116
>t. redditor

[Anonymous No.13322206]

>>13322131
>>13322133
i wouldn't know what is reddit about that statement, but maybe you two can enlighten me since you're so familiar with what reddit does.

[Anonymous No.13322229]

>>13322206
atheism is reddit

[Anonymous No.13322237]

>>13322206
go back

[Anonymous No.13322273]

>>13321899
I've seen so many atheist threads on /lit/ today. I wonder what the deal is. Try to put yourself in these atheist's shoes:

>Science is God
>Scientists are the priests of God, only they can transmit the truth to us
>Never question the scientist-priests
>Abortion is a human right
>We must vaccinate all children
>We must circumcise all children
>We need artificial insemination
>We must colonize other planets despite problems on our own

[Anonymous No.13322282]

>>13322206
It's reddit because it reeks of reddit. It's like idolizing someone who moves Bibles to the fiction section- edgy

[Anonymous No.13322376]

>>13321903
>Plato
kek

[Anonymous No.13322565]

>>13321977
>People practically go pale at the sight of the book
it's actually because the guy holding it is wearing a black zoot suit and has a full-sized katana strapped to his back

[Anonymous No.13322850]

>>13321907

[Anonymous No.13324148]

>>13322206
go back faggot

[Anonymous No.13324156]

Ah, another thread where a poor autistic fellow hunts for (you)s

[Anonymous No.13324169]

>>13322229
4chan invented atheism

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!/qKRybJPyoB No.13324233]

>>13321955
This.
Gtfo the literature board, you larping ninnies.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!/qKRybJPyoB No.13324247]

>>13322565
Naw, it’s because it’s Tennessee. Them people is wyt un’erneath they red sunburns

[Anonymous No.13324383]

>>13322282
>not ironically moving the Bible to the fiction section, then shoplifting a copy of Lolita

[Anonymous No.13324419]

Whether it's theism, or atheism, you can't get rid of the fedora on the Internet. At least early 2010s atheists really didn't believe. Can't say the same for internet fedora Christians and their positive belief who seem to brandish their theism as a fashion identity. Also, terrible Christians. Even Catholics and Anglicans seem to adopt protestant American evangelical tongue-speaking tactics when discussing god. I give it 5 years tops. Maybe we'll even see a 'horsemen' phenomenon for theism in pop culture, much like we did with atheism. But it will ultimately dilute gods to conceptualisations that will be incompatible with theism. About time Christians take the Jewish route and accept 'cultural Christians' as part of their tribe. Not a bad development all things considered.

[Anonymous No.13324442]

[Anonymous No.13324565]

>>13322282
>/lit/'s top 100 is 99 books of fiction, and the bible
really makes one reflect

[Anonymous No.13324626]

>>13324442
Not gonna lie, that's not a bad beard.

[Anonymous No.13324647]

Why Hume didn't burned to death?
He made A treatise of Human nature.

Like, If Spinoza had officially published the Ethics in his lifetime, he would have been burned to death. Definitely.

>"He... he is theist! he still believed in god!'
But Spinoza too! Spinoza also believed in god!
this is the truth; it doesn't matter whether you believe god or not when it comes to burning someone!
Hume didn't believe in miracles, It doesn't matter it contains Lazarus or not, why nobody burned hume?

>"there's some time gap between two, that's the difference"
I thought this is the answer, but it doesn't seem that convincing.
it is 63 years.
I mean, it is something, but not that a lot; 64 years ago from today Nabokov made Lolita. What happened to it since then? it is something, but not that much.
If this can apply to today, then what does it happened to Hume?

>"He is not that radical compared to Spinoza"
But... is it though?
this would be matter of opinion but Hume is definitely radical; radical enough to compete Spinoza.
In my opinion Is-ought problem is harsher than Spinoza's view.
and It is the Hume who waked up Kant's dogmatic slumber.

[Anonymous No.13324653]

why's there always such a spergout on this topic

[Anonymous No.13324664]

>>13324626
like pottery

[Anonymous No.13324721]

>>13324626
it looks like garbage and needs a trim

[Anonymous No.13324733]

>>13324233
based

[Anonymous No.13324732]

>>13321899
Does this mean that being a theist is edgy now?