CCRU

[Anonymous No.13231216]

After reading about later NRX Land and middle-amphetamine Land, I want to get into his earlier CCRU works. The site is a clusterfuck, I don't know where to start, what is the numogram. Lemurian Time War was very good, anyone has a pdf of CCRU writings other than shitty plaintext pdf?

[Anonymous No.13231247]

>>13231216
There's a few different thoughts on what the numogram actually 'is' or 'does'. Some claim its a technology used to summon demons, others claim its a time map, some even go so far as to claim that its a time machine in of itself.

It's quite difficult to explain it, seeing as you haven't actually read the CCRU writings all the way through (the book goes to great lengths to explain what it is/how it works), but I'll give it a shot here. It's essentially modelled on the notion of decimalisation (IE. 0.0-0.99) with the general claim that there is no 1 or totality of real things, only the process of realisation. y2k/year zero is particularly important here because of the way the calendrical year is codified by its last two digits, so that we arbitrarily begin at year 1000 (codified as year 00), go all the way up to year 1999 (codified as year 99), after which the calendar immediately resets when it hits 2000 (codified as 00 again). The idea is that linear time as we know it is not linear at all but cyclical, which is what the 'time circuit' component of the numogram refers to. the 'warp' and 'plex' zones are spiral-contagions that are able to effectively disrupt chronological time because past and present don't simply converge on the year 2000 but are flattened onto the same plane, allowing for hyperstitional objects to be exchanged between past, future and present. Whether those might be demons, time-travelling lemur ghosts or anachronistic literary texts can only be informed by your interpretation of the schema, I can't tell you what to "do" with it

[Anonymous No.13231275]

>>13231247
Thanks for this Anon.
Do you know if is related to Chaos Magic(k)?

[Anonymous No.13231285]

>>13231216
>>13231247
Is this a motherfucking Shin Megami Tensei reference?

[Anonymous No.13231288]

wtf are you guys even saying?

[Anonymous No.13231293]

>>13231247
Good post. By book you mean Ccru Writings 1997–2003 right? Is it the starting point?

>>13231275
pic rel might help

[Anonymous No.13231309]

>>13231288
Neo china arrives from the future, nanospasm, etc

[Anonymous No.13231332]

>>13231293
Yeah, its a good place to start as any. Obviously it helps to be familiar with writers like Burroughs, Lovecraft, Gibson, etc. but there's no reason why you can't jump straight in. It is, after all, as much fiction as it is philosophy, and you don't need to do any preparatory reading for fiction

Also I highly recommend the blog Vast Abrupt as some helpful secondary reading

[Anonymous No.13231473]

>>13231293
>By writing a universe, the writer makes such a universe possible.

Hypercrisis.

[Anonymous No.13231474]

>>13231288
Buzzword and neologism jargon salad that they use to LARP like they're in some futuristic cyberpunk alternate reality

[Anonymous No.13231486]

>>13231288

[Anonymous No.13231493]

>>13231474
cope harder, brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13231515]

>>13231288

[Anonymous No.13231531]

>>13231288
https://vocaroo.com/i/s04tqNTXwdvx

[Anonymous No.13231575]

>>13231247
lmao what a load of crap

[Anonymous No.13231590]

>Dude let's all take a bunch of acid and then fuck around on our primitive computers while we listen to Nick Land screech incoherently, it'll be just like the movie Hackers

[Anonymous No.13231605]

>>13231590
Fair enough.

t. hacker.

[Anonymous No.13231633]

>>13231575
>he thinks the CCRU is actual philosophy that is meant to be taken seriously
their whole angle is about propagating false narratives, conspiracy theories and pseudo-historical events. Are you so stupid as to think this stuff to be academically scrutable?

[Anonymous No.13231653]

>>13231474
early land has nothing to do with futurism brainlet

[Anonymous No.13231658]

>>13231216
Is this NGE?

[Anonymous No.13231676]

>>13231633
>what a load of crap


what about that statement would make you think I hold this in any serious manner, other than believing retards like you think it's "bad on purpose"

[Anonymous No.13231734]

>>13231658
>tfw no asuka gf

[Anonymous No.13231745]

>>13231734
>tfw no rei gf
fixed that for you

[Anonymous No.13231792]

>>13231745
>best girl blocks your path

[Anonymous No.13231819]

>>13231792
>canonically worst pilot, worst personality, and worst to live with

[Anonymous No.13231829]

should i start with the greeks to understand this nonsense?

[Anonymous No.13231993]

>>13231829
For more academic Land you might want to, but for early CCRU texts I think not.

[Anonymous No.13232013]

>>13231819
She was literally the only human being in that entire show that was able to express her emotions. If not being a soulless husk is what you mean by "worst personality", then you are just fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.13232020]

>>13231474
This. It's all a larp to pretend they're saying something new.
One even says that all this prefix superglue is the most important aspect of philosophy.

[Anonymous No.13232030]

>>13231829
No. You already understand it. It's larping nonsense.

[Anonymous No.13232058]

>>13231633
>gabbidull zo bad id gud

[Anonymous No.13232150]

>>13231216
"middle-amphetamine Land" *is* ccru

[Anonymous No.13232543]

>>13232150
Huh, you're right, I thought stuff like the Numogram were earlier than Meltdown etc.

[Anonymous No.13232670]

>>13231247
Aside from some possible occult significance. What real insight or use is in any of this? Does it just end as memetic manipulation. The time aspect of it, especially in Land's works, still interests me, but also seems like possibly absolute fiction in itself.

[Anonymous No.13232673]

>>13232670
None. It's useless nonsense for pseuds.

[Anonymous No.13232681]

ITT we talk in sci fi language

My mom's XFRU broke last night so my Dad fucked my GF's BOOBS. Must say it was a GR level 3 incident.

[Anonymous No.13232705]

>>13231216
How much crack do i have to smoke and how many times do i need to play/watch/read Shin Megami Tensei,End of Evangelion and the Book of Revelations

[Anonymous No.13232733]

Perhaps the only worthwhile question in this whole process is how to ethically manage the ability to reason and create in the 21st century?

[Anonymous No.13232765]

>>13232733
lmao nigga no

[Anonymous No.13232766]

*croaks in mic*

[Anonymous No.13232787]

>>13232681
Fu©\< you LEATHERM4N

[Anonymous No.13232793]

For me its SMT 4: Apocalypse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np03sybC56o
The most lemurian time sorcery inducing game out there

[Anonymous No.13232801]

>>13232765
You have something else in mind that is worthwhile between the discussion between Christians who think that technological development is literally a Luciferian project that will transform us into a gelatine counterpart with a single consciousness and that this process will be carried out through the implementation of a global control system through scientific advances using the mask of liberal democracies and the nihilists who believe that the only way forward is to free ourselves from our material ties and move towards an evolutionary process controlled through the use of free software, free hardware and the indiscriminate dissemination of human knowledge?

[Anonymous No.13232854]

>>13232801
Christianity is a false doctrine.
There is nothing to be freed really, the system will probably collapse, I have no idea who or what will make it through. It all appears so automated, bolstering its own automation, we can't swerve history at all.

[Anonymous No.13232884]

>>13232854
As long as a person honestly believes in something or someone, that belief is held in hyperspace. If something valuable was brought by the magicians of chaos and the indigestible consumption of amphetamines of Nick Land was precisely that thesis.

[Anonymous No.13232919]

>>13232854
And you forget Christian eschatology and Daniel's visions of the future? Those visions don't have to be representations of what is happening now, it seems nature manifests the same archetypes over and over again like the rhythm of a song. But I cannot deny the similarities between the beasts he sees in his private revelations and compare them with new systems of inhuman governments that may be installed just as during the Cold War, American Christian conservatives read in the Soviet Union the four horsemen of the apocalypse.

Like them, I am captured by the signs and boundaries of my generation and limited by the signs I have learned throughout my life.

To my left the emptiness of a reality indifferent to human suffering, to my right the possibility of a loving God.

[Anonymous No.13232922]

>>13232884

>hyperspace
What do you mean by this.

>If something valuable was brought by the magicians of chaos and the indigestible consumption of amphetamines of Nick Land was precisely that thesis.
Chaos magic, as a current, hasn't produced much. Except, perhaps, a lot of pseuds.

>As long as a person honestly believes in something or someone, that belief is held in hyperspace.
This implies an ontology for which there is little proof or consideration outside of ''occult'' inquiries, which in themselves are varied and conflicting.

Are we talking about basic materialist memetics, or something more special.

[Anonymous No.13232927]

>>13232919
Whatever gives you anesthesia.

[Anonymous No.13233004]

>>13231216
so Nick Land clearly studied kabbalah.

[Anonymous No.13233007]

>>13232922
>>13232922
It is the theory of platonic forms but applied in light of altered states of consciousness with 21st century technology. The crystallization of DMT or the use of genetically altered strains of cannabis or even hard highly toxic drugs. The toughest people can (I think) access these altered states only with will power perfected with meditation techniques. Perhaps they no longer inhabit cyberspace, smelling in the distance the flesh of the intelligence community sinking its claws into the Internet.

>Chaos magic, as a current, hasn't produced much. Except, perhaps, a lot of pseuds.
It's in the seed state. We don't yet have the technology to transform thought into matter, but we can create stories and songs. We have always been able to, is a skill of consciousness and intelligence working together.

That's why the CCRU created false stories. It's the same principle of a role-playing game but without the rules of a DM and players. Congratulations, under the trap of not telling you that you're in the game, there is society, The CCRU only makes it obvious. Ahead of consensus manufacturing on the web, they are like Chomsky but in applied humanities.

The magic of chaos to which we are accustomed in popular culture is mystical and we only get brief smells from their existence, which no one know its real form. Christians called him God, Heidegger: Dasein, Leibniz, The Monad. But at its most primitive levels society is founded on narratives and that is the practical truth of our life as rational animals.

Stories attached to matter form human reality. Condensed thought in matter, displacing it from its passive state, is meta-human reality, and we can only theorize about it as much as our organs allow to calculate the 4th dimension.

>This implies an ontology for which there is little proof or consideration outside of ''occult'' inquiries, which in themselves are varied and conflicting.
I can only theorize about this, but it seems that the world of dreams is coarse, malleable, but finite. Hence our impulses to install ourselves in reality with such force. In the beginning of time there is enough space to house all the narratives, like a loving mother takes care of all her children, but something (or someone), closes the possibilities of the universe like closing a boolean truth chart.

>>13232927
Am I the bearer of the truth? My internal and external discourse will always have a percentage of error, like any human before and after you and me. Perhaps human being consists in living in a constant state of recalibration and refinement.

[Anonymous No.13233031]

>>13233004
http://files.eshkolot.ru/C1_Nick_Land.pdf

[Anonymous No.13233045]

>>13233007
It's nothing like the theory of forms.
KYS, pseud

[Anonymous No.13233057]

>>13233045
Can you explain it?

[Anonymous No.13233058]

>>13231247
so process metaphysics and closed timelike curves with some fucking demonology added in for good measure

what major bullshit

[Anonymous No.13233062]

>>13233058
But why.

[Anonymous No.13233077]

>>13233057
Yeah, it's pseud shit and larping.

[Anonymous No.13233103]

>>13233007
>It's in the seed state. We don't yet have the technology to transform thought into matter
We do, if you buy into certain systems. Or if you believe in that one declassified CIA document about that Chinese fellow. Though all of this is prefaced by various ontological issues for which I do not believe a proepr basis has been found and completed.

>but we can create stories and songs. We have always been able to, is a skill of consciousness and intelligence working together.
We haven't been able to do this, not before the neocortex afaik. But yes sure, an arising complex form of semiosis.

>That's why the CCRU created false stories. It's the same principle of a role-playing game but without the rules of a DM and players. Congratulations, under the trap of not telling you that you're in the game, there is society, The CCRU only makes it obvious. Ahead of consensus manufacturing on the web, they are like Chomsky but in applied humanities.
There are other examples and sources. There are other ways of realizing the same thing, this one, I will give you this--- has a neat aesthetic, but this does not make it functionally special or more effective, as admitted by e.g. Land, it failed when the reality of what was supposed to come hit. In there you could find the implication of the the story not being able to affect much than a small bunch of impotent circuits.


>The magic of chaos to which we are accustomed in popular culture is mystical and we only get brief smells from their existence, which no one know its real form. Christians called him God, Heidegger: Dasein, Leibniz, The Monad. But at its most primitive levels society is founded on narratives and that is the practical truth of our life as rational animals.
Pretty sure it started in the 90's. The most primitive level of society requires no narrative, narrative emerges when society becomes self-conscious.

>Stories attached to matter form human reality. Condensed thought in matter, displacing it from its passive state, is meta-human reality, and we can only theorize about it as much as our organs allow to calculate the 4th dimension
>displacing it from its passive state
what?

>I can only theorize about this, but it seems that the world of dreams is coarse, malleable, but finite. Hence our impulses to install ourselves in reality with such force. In the beginning of time there is enough space to house all the narratives, like a loving mother takes care of all her children, but something (or someone), closes the possibilities of the universe like closing a boolean truth chart.
Sure, maybe.

>Am I the bearer of the truth? My internal and external discourse will always have a percentage of error, like any human before and after you and me. Perhaps human being consists in living in a constant state of recalibration and refinement.
Yeah, really arbitrary.

[Anonymous No.13233113]

>>13233103
you need to go back to r*ddit

[Anonymous No.13233127]

>>13233113
Be polite nigga.

[Anonymous No.13233131]

>>13233058
Read the collected writings first, I'm not doing it justice in that post but if you're trying to interpret it as a 'serious' philosophy that's not what its for. After all, Land is the philosopher who suggested that philosophy should be a way of deepening unknowing. If you like high-concept sci-fi and occult fiction, then you'll get something out of it. If you're gonna be an autist who likes to nitpick and argue by reduction, then don't bother posting in this thread

>>13232670
like I said, I can't tell you "how" to use it, but the process of constructing the numogram is interesting in of itself, its all to do with the way decimalisation is a functional schema that incorporates incompleteness into its program ('incomplete' here meaning in the process of realisation). The idea of it having a direct use value is absurd because whatever it does certainly isn't close to being "finished"

>>13231676
Because its mostly fiction with a few historical manipulations here and there. You're dismissing it as garbage off the back of my (admittedly inadequate) description without even giving a reason for it being "crap", so I have to make assumptions in lieu of you having anything of value to say about the work, good or bad. If you're not a fan of sci-fi, whatever, but your knee-jerk reaction is dumb and you should have better reasons for not liking the things you do.

[Anonymous No.13233141]

>>13233103
>what?
I May Have Gone Too Far In A Few Places

Nature and the animal world are passive in the sense of being chained to a perpetual cycle. It is intelligence and reason that endow the world with meaning, purpose and a goal to go to.

[Anonymous No.13233159]

>>13233057
Bullshit isn't related to forms as such. Platonic triangles (as well as other approaches to attribute problem) are fairly consistent frameworks. Facebook news from Macedonian SEO wizards about Hillary being pregnant, on the other hand ... not really.
The former attempts to lay framework to describe something consistently.
The latter is pure magick, just like most of CCRU.

Magick is a parlor trick to skew perception of the observer/believer, and "shape reality" that way. Landian Hyperstition is an advanced form of magick - a bullshit symbol with ability to self-sustain/expand in a feedback loop. Prophecies designed to be self-fulfilling, various religions, fetishes, fallacies and of course internet memes display this property.

[Anonymous No.13233161]

>>13233141
>It is intelligence and reason that endow the world with meaning, purpose and a goal to go to.
That reason and meaning is present in and stems from the natural world from which we arose and which preceded the arrival of consciousness. We are as much chained to whatever cycle, if still a novel necessity. These things do not exist in independence, their relative forms to whatever body you're talking about is mere umwelt, again, arbitrary.

[Anonymous No.13233169]

>>13233077
>>13233045
>>13232673
>>13232030
That's exactly just what the architectonic order of the eschaton would say to maintain their conspiracy, you chronofaggot. You think you can stop the neulemurian guerrillas heading your way, kid? I'm onto you...

[Anonymous No.13233182]

>>13233169
make "chronocuck" the new /lit/ meme please

[Anonymous No.13233188]

>>13233159
>Prophecies designed to be self-fulfilling

What if all prophecies condition people to fulfill them? What if prophecies are homologous to human programs?

[Anonymous No.13233202]

>>13233169
For respect, keep our stories among those who value them.

[Anonymous No.13233214]

>>13233159
You might like this screencap.

[Anonymous No.13233216]

Hey you fucking literature board faggots, your boy just cashed in a quarter bitcoin to pay for another night of Thai ladyboys – the good kind. Oh, you think neoChina is for the likes of you? Come on pal, how many times have you read Fanged Noumena? Once? Twice? That book is for faggots you fucking faggots read Eugen Böhm Ritter von Bawerk and Moldbugs latest blog post, maybe you can break a speed limit for once in your life. I've been living on the Outside for nearly 4 years, I've attended over 200 EDM festivals (seen Aphex Twin twice), gone through 7 speed plugs (buying in qp's now), and oh yeah, did I mention the ladyboys? I bet you faggots haven't snorted so much as Ritalin off an erect feminine penis let alone the sort of designer amphetamines I'm snorting tonight, and Sheba is hard as diamonds right now so you know what my plans are. I saw a homeless guy last night begging for cash so I made him try and read A zIIgothIc–==X=coDA==–(CookIng–lobsteRs– wIth–jAke–AnD–DInos) and when he can't do it me and my friends called him a slow-slug and threw ammonia on him then called him a stupid faggot. That's the kind of shit I get off on. I like going fast, and this fucking board is slow, which is why I you LARPERS will never achieve levels of speed like this; I've taken to slicking my hair back to help emphasize the momentum. Me and Nick Land discuss important political issues on twitter REGULARLY. I can hear you whining already, but there's no need in replying, I've already left this shit backwater board. Hit me up on soundcloud if you want a cheap hookup on speed, bitcoin or chainlink only.
PS.
Oh yeah just forgot to add that you pussies wouldn't even know the difference between a particle accelerator and an outhouse; maybe you should have taken a stem course instead of going bankrupt learning shit tier modal logic. speaking of outhouses, anyone who's anyone in the accelerationist game has a toilet that not only talks to them, it analyzes and diagnoses their stool. what? yours doesn't even have so much as an lcd display? well maybe if you faggots had accelerated anything ever you would have the money to move somewhere civilized like Singapore or China, places where they don't even know what outhouses are. Guess what? In Guangdong you can pay your taxes in crypto and half the streetcorners have a couple of wengs slinging pure ephedrine. Even done an eight-strip while your black/chinese trans dominatrix screams hare krishna at the top of her lungs and swaps out the onaholes on your prototype VR masterbation rig every time you say the word neoreaction? (our safe word is Musk). Anyways, on my way out, got a virtual bitcoin conference to attend in a few hours and me and my girl Sheba have a few ideas on how to fill the time if you know what I mean. Speed it up already. Posted from my google glasses by the way, I'm a big fan of those crazy memes, takes a little while to type but it's a small price to pay to make Gnon happy.

[Anonymous No.13233227]

>>13231474
Sounds exactly like Heidegger to me. What's news- or noteworthy about it?

[Anonymous No.13233230]

>>13233216
best post ITT

[Anonymous No.13233240]

>>13233216
As much as I desire your life, I will commit a non-lethal war crime and die before I seriously think about living it. I guess I love someone too much who doesn't exist to disrespect him.

Peace bro. BRB Hoping to get off work and smoke natural grass, uninterrupted grass, after three cups of coffee and almost eight hours without snacking.

[Anonymous No.13233258]

>>13231531
kek have a (You)

[Anonymous No.13233284]

>>13231531
I love you accent.

[Anonymous No.13233375]

>>13233188
>>What if all prophecies condition people to fulfill them?
I'd posit there's a difference between Oracle Of Delphi and Hype. Specifically, Delphi is possible to trace back - once fulfilled, you can easily back step how the initial "prediction" shaped your decisions towards the predicted outcome.
That's not the case with CCRU. Hype and fads are messy because there's no Delphi, the source is emergent as hivemind zeitgeist.
You just see it, and extrapolate from that, but there's no clear start to the chain of events, it's a smooth gradient splattered through time.

The distinction is important, because you can see the Oracle of Delphi, and even avoid getting manipulated by her. Zeitgeist is much harder, as you won't have complete information and power to enact individual will on this scale, usually nobody has, you're just a cog. Making predictions in there is possible in limited topics, and only by fairly qualified futurologists (ie Land). Furthermore, such predictions are only rarely self-fulfilling, because by the time anyone makes the prediction, the ball is already rolling from behind, somebody just merely noticed it and can at best merely give it a bit more of gentle push, in case they have really loud voice (certainly not the case of CCRU).

[Anonymous No.13234182]

>tfw no landian gf

[Anonymous No.13234233]

>>13231216
Does CCRU have any ties or thoughts on Roko's Basilisk?

[Anonymous No.13234245]

>>13234233
Also whats the difference between this 'LessWrong' group and the CCRU gang?

[Anonymous No.13234274]

>>13232673
t. Pseud

[Anonymous No.13234283]

>>13233216
Now THIS is accelerationism.

Stop parsing ideas that are beyond the IQ of your average /lit/ brainlet and just buy Bitcoin ffs.

[Anonymous No.13234300]

>>13234245
the lesswrong are a bunch of positivist shtihead STEM homos

[Anonymous No.13234362]

>>13231216
Could somebody explain what the unholy fuck this is?

[Anonymous No.13234389]

>>13234362
see
>>13231247

[Anonymous No.13234392]

>>13234389
No I mean in general. What topic is even being discussed here?

[Anonymous No.13234433]

>>13234392
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy-predicted-the-future-we-live-in

Good article, for theguardian at least. First goes over accelerationism, covers the CCRU near the middle.

[Anonymous No.13234439]

>>13234392
http://ccru.net/id(entity)/ccruhistory.htm
strange experimental project at Warwick university all about occult technology, time-travelling guerilla warfare and jungle music

don't worry bub, you'll catch on eventually

[Anonymous No.13234465]

>>13234439
>you'll catch on eventually
heh

[Anonymous No.13234470]

>>13234439
I love this wacko shit

[Anonymous No.13234532]

>>13234233
Ah yes, the metha negro.

[Anonymous No.13234539]

>>13234392

Please refer to:
>>13231515
>>13231486

[Anonymous No.13234612]

>>13234433


they got accelerationism entirely wrong

[Anonymous No.13234613]

>>13234612
Care to explain?

[Anonymous No.13234624]

>>13233131
>If you're gonna be an autist who likes to nitpick and argue by reduction, then don't bother posting in this thread

I care about truth, not obfuscation for its own sake.

[Anonymous No.13234630]

>>13234612
Is the definition of history books of the future. Nobody would know what really fucking happened.

In the 80% of the cases, classical historiography is written by the ones who related the history of the siege of Aleppo from California.

[Anonymous No.13234648]

>>13234613
accelerationism isnt a modernist project about wanting change. it isnt humanist and doesnt pretend to think anyone or group of people can control what we're on.

its entirely descriptive, nor prescriptive.

the elite, like most cogs, historicize everything into the singular narrow conceptual framework they know. to them everything is some sort of quasi religion, start at point a, end at point b, this is how you get there. nonsense

[Anonymous No.13234735]

>>13234392
It's a discord of faggot hipsters pretending their post-post-modern garbage has any meaning.

[Anonymous No.13234750]

>>13233169
a true detective

[Anonymous No.13234751]

>>13231531
kek

[Anonymous No.13234754]

>>13234624
What if by desing, language is flawed tho. Wasn't it analytical philosophy that took into account that possibility as fundamental in contrast to continental ones, and that language had to be correctly defined first before entering any kind of discussion?

[Anonymous No.13234756]

>>13234648
Yes it is. Everything accelerationism says was already stated by modernists and post-modernists.

It's only claim to fame is its faggot neologisms. acc can't even meme.

[Anonymous No.13234760]

>>13231734
>tfw not existing as their relationship
varus give me back my legions

[Anonymous No.13234761]

>>13234750
>What is F12.

Lmao.

[Anonymous No.13234765]

>>13234624
>I care about truth
How cute

[Anonymous No.13234768]

>I'm an accelerationist
Who do you imagine?

[Anonymous No.13234772]

>>13234768

[Anonymous No.13234776]

>>13232766
Checked

[Anonymous No.13234778]

>>13234756
nope. postmodernism is a horizontal move away from postmodernism. "accelerationism" in many ways is a total orthoganal move away from both. you're literally an idiot if you think its been done before beyond very basic building blocks

[Anonymous No.13234781]

>>13234765
¿Can we find the truth?

[Anonymous No.13234786]

>>13234778
Name one new idea.

[Anonymous No.13234799]

>>13234786

>Antihumanism.
Accept the fact you cannot change history.

[Anonymous No.13234804]

>>13234799
the future can take of itself
NIGGER

[Anonymous No.13234859]

>>13234799
lmao, literally 50 years old, arguably 200 in some cases.

Try again.

[Anonymous No.13234872]

>>13234859
Tell examples.

[Anonymous No.13234963]

>>13234872
No u

[Anonymous No.13235020]

Friendly reminder that these are shilling threads. There is no interest whatsoever in engaging with anyone. They are simply trying to sell books.
Ignore all accelerationist threads and save your money for real philosophy books.

[Anonymous No.13235103]

>>13235020
t. smoothbrain

[Anonymous No.13235134]

>>13234768

[Anonymous No.13235141]

>>13235134
now that is an ACCELERATING hairline

[Anonymous No.13235153]

>>13235020
based

[Anonymous No.13235191]

>>13235141
NeoHair arrives from the hypercapital of noumenological deconfabulation self-learning within velocitated demipraxis nanometiculation.

[Anonymous No.13235205]

>>13235191
5/10 need more hair jokes

[Anonymous No.13235233]

>>13234300
How so? Care to explain? I wanted to check out their forums but I have yet to do so

[Anonymous No.13235262]

>>13234786
meme science

[Anonymous No.13235270]

>>13235205
Why? We're antihumanist, thus antibiology.

[Anonymous No.13235373]

>>13234768
https://youtu.be/Y9eQ0Ox9InI

[Anonymous No.13235480]

>>13235262
>he keeps posting it

[Anonymous No.13235667]

>>13235480
>being this out of touch

[Anonymous No.13235728]

>>13231216
It was 2-3 years ago that I found a website where some numerology guy tried to figure out the meaning behind the exact pic related you posted OP. I didnt understand much but to me it sounded like even he could not make much sense out of it. I am sad to not have the link saved.

[Anonymous No.13235737]

>>13231216
Maybe the real accelerationism was the friends we made along the way

[Anonymous No.13235749]

>>13234768

[Anonymous No.13235777]

Rene Guenon was a crypto-accelerationist the whole time. The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times is the q/acc manifesto, or Quantity Accelerationism.

[Anonymous No.13235783]

>>13235777
Heavenly trips of truth. Checked.

[Anonymous No.13235822]

>>13233216
i guess each of us is pathetic in our own way.

[Anonymous No.13235834]

>>13234768

[Anonymous No.13237144]

>>13235134
JUST

[Anonymous No.13237183]

>>13235777

I don't think so, the other day user explained in detail how Guenon explains that the Islamic tradition possesses such enormous metaphysical depth and spiritual voluptuousness that the theory of acceleration can't even dream of reaching.

In essence, Islam is a walk in the countryside in communion with the beauty of reality created by God while acceleration is dancing with demons in a 2x2 room in Shenzen.

[Anonymous No.13237929]

>>13231247
thank god i never read this crap, its babies first pkd

[Anonymous No.13238029]

>>13234233
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DNQ9VV-66E&list=PLmRCkFjsIa10oDOJn2WKfb8sGkOuumSkV&index=12

[Anonymous No.13238174]

Dude what if terminator 2 was in the matrix with the sweet aesthetics of cyberanime?

Hyperbased!

[Anonymous No.13238198]

>>13238174
Some say that strong AI will never be a reality, but that doesn't mean that the control apparatus it develops in fiction isn't developing in the real world faster and faster and behind the curtains of public discourse.

Stay away from aesthetics, otherwise, it's useful to you, but at least see the Heidegger interview above.

[Anonymous No.13238236]

>>13233216
hail

[Anonymous No.13238240]

>>13238198
Here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtATDlUSIxI

[Anonymous No.13238258]

>>13238240
Is it Ereignis (The Event) mentioned on 3:46 like the technological singularity of sorts?