Deleuze and Transgenders

[Anonymous No.13200977]

Why are most prominent Deleuzeans I encounter online transgenders or at least part of the lgbt movement? Is there something about him that attracts trannies specifically?

[Anonymous No.13200989]

Mentally ill ideology.
Mentally ill followers.

[Anonymous No.13200991]

>>13200977
big brains
small dicks

[Anonymous No.13200998]

>>13200977
rude
>>13200989
rude
>>13200991
rude

[Anonymous No.13201002]

high iq, imagine yourself as a monkey and me (trap) as a human. lgbt and transgenders are pretty cringe overall. But traps are based and redpilled.

[Anonymous No.13201024]

>>13200977
Probably his schizo apologetics
>Woah! I'm creative, unique and subversive just like a BwO. Literally me!
Meanwhile trannies are literal agents of capital

[Anonymous No.13201028]

>>13201024
black world order?

[Anonymous No.13201032]

>>13201028
Body Without Organs

[Anonymous No.13201038]

[shit tier]
Deleuze - Transgender and low IQ
Foucalt - Homosexual and low IQ
Baudrillard - Pseuds and low IQ
[god tier]
Derrida - Big brains.

[Anonymous No.13201040]

>>13201024
>trannies are literal agents of capital
to be fair, everything is a literal agent of capital

[Anonymous No.13201060]

>>13200977
I’m a Deleuzean and not transgender. I’d guess the whole thing about multiplicities and deterritorialization (the body contains mode than what is contained in our cheap normalized concept of “body,” we need to gut ourselves of any limitations that we have internalized and stifled our capacity for movement, intensitities, the creation of new conceptualizations for our bodies) is most attractive, though imo trans people are just reterritorializing their bodies in superficially less rigid ways ways so idk man people are sheep.

>>13200977
>Deleuze
>ideology
k thanks for playing

[Anonymous No.13201130]

>>13201060
>le multiplicities and deterritorialization
EXPLAIN DELEUZE TO ME OR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU! DON'T DUMB IT DOWN INTO SOME VAGUE SHIT! EXPLAIN DELEUZE TO ME RIGHT NOW OR I'LL LITERALLY FUCKING KILL YOu! WHAT THE FUCK IS A BODY WITHOUT ORGANS? WHAT THE FUCK ARE RHIZOMES? DON'T DUMB IT DOWN OR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU

[Anonymous No.13201138]

>>13201060
what do u mean by territorialization and multiplicities. please explain these terms to me.

[Anonymous No.13201150]

>>13201138
No, I’m not google. Do your own reading lazy boy.

>>13201130
this

[Anonymous No.13201180]

>>13201150
Dude i swear i tried reading it, i even bought a "Deleuze dictionary" book to make sense out of this stuff, despite being struggling financially,, but it was too difficult. i really want to understand his ideas i just need some help, it doesn't need to be detailed, i feel very weird and anxious about not getting it. i really wish i could get into these discussions. i am not being ironic, help me out. i will delete this post later probably >_<

[Anonymous No.13201288]

>>13200977
>mentally ill people in a death cult attracted to mentally ill death cult philosophy
Really makes you think...

[Anonymous No.13201291]

Gender is a fluid so you are always in the state of becoming just like a body without organs

[Anonymous No.13201300]

>>13200998
rude but truthful. I LOVE TERFS WHO DO YOU MAIN ON MORTAL KOMBAT AHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

[Anonymous No.13201303]

Neovagina arrives from the future

https://vastabrupt.com/2018/10/31/gender-acceleration/

[Anonymous No.13201305]

>>13201038
Derrida is an obscurantist who should be switched with Baudrillard (who I see you couldn't come up with any arguments against because you have no knowledge of him so used the placeholder insult of this board) who was less of an obscurantist. Foucault is just basic shit and shouldn't even be included in this ranking.

[Anonymous No.13201310]

>>13201024
>Trannies are literally agents of capital
Implying that's a bad thing

[Anonymous No.13201318]

>>13201038
>Derrida
>not pseuds, trannies and feminists
bro the 1980s called

[Anonymous No.13201319]

>>13200977
someone hit the nail on the head about this the other day, reposting what they wrote, it doesn't take much imagination to see how it applies to mentally ill people (trannies) and why they are attracted to Deluze like flies to cowshit

>Something that I've noticed is that people who take an interest in Whitehead, Deleuze, Derrida etc and who express an antipathy towards 'being' typically suffer from inwards flaws that make them seek to disassociate them from themselves, to metaphysically 'cuckold' themselves out of existence as it were. They then project this attitude onto everything and everyone which is why like western buddhists and anglo protestants they take to proselytizing their newfound beliefs because it helps to fill the hole in their heart

>Everyone who obsesses over "process" philosophy and related French thinkers all do so because they have some ingrained flaw, either they are ugly, too short, don't have good social skills, unintelligent, the list goes on, either that or it's because they've messed up their life in some way. Reading these figures acts as a consolation because that way it helps one convince themselves that none of these things actually mattered or have real significance, because "it's all just a process etc', it functions as form of catharsis, it's all very transparent and amusing for me to observe...

[Anonymous No.13201328]

>>13201319
Interesting analysis. In the end, the clown world that has been allowed to be created by the jews has ravaged large amounts of the human race. It's a shame what has been done to these people. In a just world, we could have taken care of these people instead of had them subjected to this mental poison which ruins entire civilizations

[Anonymous No.13201406]

>>13201038
Supreme Being tier - Guenon

[Anonymous No.13202093]

>>13200977
>Is there something about him that attracts trannies specifically?

Suicide?

[Anonymous No.13202211]

>>13200977
They took "becoming-woman" literally (which is actually the Deleuzian way of understanding because he rejected metaphors, which promotes freaking capitalist exchange and shit!!)

[Anonymous No.13202221]

>>13201305
>switched with Baudrillard

[Anonymous No.13202222]

>>13201319
>He/she/it believes people are into not being but becoming, bwo, etc because of not fitting into conventions.
Lmao. People like that probably don’t give a fuck (or the should it they actually think) about conventions and social norms.

[Anonymous No.13202223]

>>13201318
HUUUUUUR
HUUUUUR
HUUUUR
HUUUR
HUUR

[Anonymous No.13202224]

>>13201406
Please stop. That’s just- no. Uh uh

[Anonymous No.13202228]

>>13202223
exquisite differénce mon amour

[Anonymous No.13202229]

>>13201038
Yezur

[Anonymous No.13202251]

>>13201038
Godhead - René Girard

[Anonymous No.13202254]

>>13202251

[Anonymous No.13202260]

>>13202254
Rehashed Jewish negative theology won't save you from mimetic desire (becoming a trap for Heidegger), only Christ will

[Anonymous No.13202271]

>>13200977
EXPLAIN.

[Anonymous No.13202273]

>>13201319
I wouldn’t be so quick to throw all process philosophy under the bus. Buddhism is a process philosophy of sorts is usual a net positive to ones sanity and has a good track record in building stable communities. Particularly Outside the west were it is less corrupted by the new age/hippie bullshit that often gets mixed in with western Buddhism.

[Anonymous No.13202285]

>>13202273
>has good track record building stables communities
>fascists of south asia

[Anonymous No.13202286]

>>13202285
>resistance to islamic conquest is very bad!

[Anonymous No.13202333]

>>13201038
Absolutely based

[Anonymous No.13202351]

>>13202286
It is

[Anonymous No.13202379]

>>13202222
you say that, but then they spend all their time social signalling about deleuze on twitter for the dopamine rush

[Anonymous No.13202387]

>>13201038
Yikes.

[Anonymous No.13202467]

>>13200977
in a way, yes. deleuze is a go-to author for your usual "i get to say what i want because none of this real" kinda arguments, under the "de-constructionist" facade.
honestly his writings, along with derrida, fucault and the rest of them, although properly academic, are just not that interesting. they all read to me like the ramblings of people who didnt get what they wanted and now throw fits for everyone to know.

[Anonymous No.13202472]

>>13200977
Maybe his gay female eyes.

[Anonymous No.13202479]

>>13201180
fancy words for de-construction. it basicaly boils down to "since there is no real objectivity, everyone gets to make up their own truths, starting with your body)
you see how the other anon carefuly slips in that "you have to gut yourself man, cause you DONT REALLY KNOW TRUTH" argument? i mean, the intention can be honest, in the sense of having a little bit of respect for though ideas and having enough balls to question and reach your own answers through experience, but the whole thing has deteriorated into what we all already know of identity politics.

[Anonymous No.13202482]

>>13200977
lol, the guy who taught me Deleuze at uni got himself into a bit of a shitstorm a few years after I left. Apparently he'd been sleeping with some students (including with or at least with the knowledge of his wife) and while it was all consensual and people were generally thirsty for him, some of their friends got upset (or someone he was sleeping with raged that he was also sleeping with others, the facts are hazy). It got wrapped up with some other protests going on on campus but nothing substantial came of it because he apparently dindu nuffin actually wrong.

Maybe he is still a closet tranner, but he is also a pussyslaying chad.

[Anonymous No.13203906]

>>13202482
He lauded schizophrenia so is it really surprising other types of the mentally ill are attracted to him? Though to a lesser extent than schizophrenics, transsexuals replace the predominating, Aristotelian 'factual' model of reality and with their own with 0 fucks given. I am not anti-Deleuze (much lulz were had studying the madlad) or even anti-trans per se (some people genuinely have this disorder and an adult adopting a new gender is an exercise in liberty which doesn't need a grander justification).

>>13202482
Based. The prof who taught the only class I took on Deleuze specialized in the great schizo Philip K. Dick. He was how you might imagine an incel to me but he actually had a wife. Not effeminate at all, just geeky. But apparently trannies love anime and he did have a big collection of comic books in his basement so maybe he was hiding something, but I don't think so.