[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 199 KB, 640x360, 484725874_d1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13166299 No.13166299 [Reply] [Original]

what are some good books to read with your significant other?

>> No.13166308

>>13166299
Summa Theologica

>> No.13166416

Sodomy is an maladaptive and aberrant behavior that is of no benefit to the individual or species no matter how much brainlet try to shoehorn ad hoc justifications as to it's "evolutionary purpose" presupposed on nothing other than it's mere existence.

>> No.13166418

>>13166308
This
>The nature of the species is more intimately united to each individual, than any other individual is. Wherefore sins against the specific nature are more grievous.
>Reply to Objection 4: Gravity of a sin depends more on the abuse of a thing than on the omission of the right use. Wherefore among sins against nature, the lowest place belongs to the sin of uncleanness, which consists in the mere omission of copulation with another. While the most grievous is the sin of bestiality, because use of the due species is not observed. Hence a gloss on Gn. 37:2, "He accused his brethren of a most wicked crime," says that "they copulated with cattle." After this comes the sin of sodomy, because use of the right sex is not observed. Lastly comes the sin of not observing the right manner of copulation, which is more grievous if the abuse regards the "vas" than if it affects the manner of copulation in respect of other circumstances.

>> No.13166426

>>13166416
Women are annoying cunts and men are bros and I like sucking dicks. Debate me.

>> No.13166438

>>13166426
Yikes.

>> No.13166463 [DELETED] 
File: 105 KB, 540x800, 376978_ww540_hh800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13166463

>>13166418
OH NO NO NO

>> No.13166476

>>13166463
pls dont post satanic images

>> No.13166484

>>13166463
Blasphemers should be burned at the stake.

>> No.13166501
File: 47 KB, 640x440, DN530ptWAAYuqjP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13166501

>>13166476
>>13166484
get fucked you superstitious ninnies

>> No.13166531

>>13166501
Prayers didn't do anything because protestants aren't Christians.

>> No.13166573

>>13166501
Christ go back to r*ddit you cringey faggot

>> No.13166763

>>13166573
I will right after you go back to /pol/

>> No.13166765

>>13166299
tfw no gf

>> No.13166837

>>13166426
Based
>>13166438
Faggot

>> No.13167045

Read The River by O'Conner aloud to gf after she got home from work one day.
she was tired and fell asleep on the couch but said she had a dream about the preacher in the river

>> No.13167110

>>13166416
not disagreeing with you, but the Bible (or at least certain parts of it) seem to be a-okay with celibacy and living a life without procreating or marrying a woman.
why is it okay to never have sex with woman (even preferred, according to Paul) but it's wrong to have gay sex?
(i'm sure there's a reason, I'd just like to have something more official than a gut feeling)

>> No.13167130

>>13166426
Women are beautiful, men are disgusting. Debate me.

>> No.13167134
File: 367 KB, 532x398, 456456456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13167134

>>13166426

>> No.13167431

>>13167110
Where did I say celibacy was incompatible? I didn't.

>> No.13167474
File: 56 KB, 621x702, dum.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13167474

>>13166438
>YIKES

>> No.13167491

>>13167045
Gay.

>> No.13167543

>>13167431
where did i say that you said celibacy was incompatible? I didn't.
I was asking why celibacy is okay, even though it's not fulfilling the function of reproduction, but gay sex is wrong because it's not fulfilling the function of reproduction.

Savvy? I can dumb this down further if you need.

>> No.13167763

>>13167543
Is the celibate scientist who reproduce via test tubes the most redpilled person?

>> No.13167939

>>13166299
Anti-oedipus

>> No.13168039

>>13166416
Who faffing cares m8. If anything it proves that human freedom has become unbounded from strict naturalistic necessity.

>> No.13168042

>>13166426
unfortunately this