Rank them

[Anonymous No.13141266]

[Anonymous No.13141272]

0

Ban these authors from our board

[Anonymous No.13141291]

The only acceptable ranking
Deleuze
Guenon
Land
Kaczynski

[Anonymous No.13141296]

>>13141266
Ted: 100
The rest: 0

[Anonymous No.13141323]

They're all tears in the rain except for unadaddy because he made a few people go boom

[Anonymous No.13141489]

>>13141296
unironically this.

[Anonymous No.13141513]

>>13141266
8
4
6
0

[Anonymous No.13141576]

>>13141266
there is only two """serious""" categories you could rank them: memeable content and your preference.
Memeable content:
>land
>deleuze
>bomberman
>brainletnon

Preferences:
>deleuze
>land
>bomberman
>brainletnon

Political compromise
>bomberman/land
>brainletnon
>deleuze

Autism:
>land
>bomberman
>deleuze
>brainletnon

True ontologycal lucidity
>deleuze
>land
>bomberman
>brainletnon

There is no chance, in any serious ranking, for guenon to go on first place.

[Anonymous No.13141627]

le deleuze le whitehead le guenon le land ecks dee

[Anonymous No.13141679]

>>13141266
From left to right, and top to bottom:

0/0

0/0

0/0

0/0

[Anonymous No.13141787]

>>13141266
Guenon > Kaczynski > Land > Deleuze

This is final and objective

[Anonymous No.13141832]

Land > Guénon = Deleuze > Kaczynski

[Anonymous No.13141869]

>>13141266
Deleuze >>>>> Land >>> Kaczynski >>>>>>> Guenon

[Anonymous No.13141991]

>>13141296
>>13141489
retards

[Anonymous No.13142233]

>>13141266
Guenon > Ted > Land > Deleuze

[Anonymous No.13142234]

>>13141266
>Confirmed genius tier
Ted
>Smart meme philosopher tier
Delooz
>Quirky meme philosopher tier
Land
>Boring tier
Guenon

[Anonymous No.13142267]

the absolute state of /lit/

[Anonymous No.13142557]

>>13141266
Uncle Ted > Delmore Schwartz > Guenon > Land

Land would be unironically a great philosopher if he focused on instructions towards accelerationism over merely describing it's effects.

[Anonymous No.13142583]

AI BDSM Fetishist
>
"Dude Marxist machines lmao"
>
Mathematics Mutilator
>
Occult Sperglord

[Anonymous No.13142839]

>>13141576
>>13141679
>>13141869
>>13142234
>>13142557
>>13142583
The dumb pieces of shit who think guénon is some kind of pseud. LMAO. He's a brilliant mathematician, knows his western philosophy better than anyone on this board. He also learned arabic, chinese and sanskrit. That puts him above pretty much anyone in the western world. But that would require you braindead morons to open one of his books. The state of pseuds makes me want to vomit. I don't even larp as an orientalist or a metaphysicist or whatever.. But I actually read shit and buzzwords like "traditionalism" and other nonsensical terms don't have the slightest effect on me.

I won't even dwelve into his life as a sufi muslim.

Plebian mentality should be violently repressed. 99% of people should not get near any form of book or knowledge.

[Anonymous No.13142855]

>>13142839
>>13142233
>>13141787
you retards coudent tell what buddhism is if it came out your ass, the buddhism all you twats refer to comes from the Hīnayāna which is the shitty retarded version of the original doctrines compared with the Mahāyāna which stays way truer to the doctrines. You all are fascinated with a buddhism that is most likely the farthest and least familiar with any eastern doctrines aka not buddhism but some shit Westerners love to praise. As a student studying Traditionalism but more so the orientals i can't help but cringe everytime I see you discuss "Buddhism" its more so some-shit the Westerners took in and adapted to their imagination. You guys read some chart and become a Eastern monk and maybe even understand Buddhism itself? gtfo, read guenon's first book so you can get rid of your western prejudices

[Anonymous No.13142895]

me
whitehead
<<power gap>>
deleuze
<<power gap>>
shit
<<power gap>>
the rest of them

[Anonymous No.13142912]

>>13141266
ted > deluge > gaynon >>>> l*nd

[Anonymous No.13143127]

Guenon is the only one of any value. The others are far too shallow, Euro-centric, anti-metaphysical, and blinded by modern baises.
Ted is the second best since at least he sees one of the major issues in the world, but unlike Guenon, does not provide a realistic solution nor understands the metaphysical implications of the problem in the first place

[Anonymous No.13143369]

>>13142855
I don't give a shit about Buddhism, don't ever reply to me again.

[Anonymous No.13143372]

>>13141266
10
4
2
1

[Anonymous No.13143428]

>>13142839
learn math idiot, guenon hasn't done shit in math

[Anonymous No.13143440]

>>13143428
He wrote a book literally called the Metaphysical Principles of Calculus.

[Anonymous No.13143441]

>>13143428
Don't tell what to do, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.13143751]

>>13141266
Ted
Land
Deleuze
Guenon

[Anonymous No.13144096]

>>13143751
this.
>does not provide a realistic solution nor understands the metaphysical implications of the problem in the first place.

Re: Ted: it's the only realistic solution. However unrealistic it might appear, all others are less realistic, that's the purpose of much of his work to show.

Re: "metaphysical implications" I find this to be meaningless intellectual snot. Do you have an example? let's say there is some "metaphysical insight" Ted's missing. ok. great. how do you then put that into practical effect?

[Anonymous No.13144273]

>>13144096
Thanks for the @
Practical, applicable, understandable. You shouldn't sacrifice clarity for simplicity, but being esoteric for the sole purpose of pleasing academics shows how little value you wish to truly provide.

Ted is right and most realistic, but eventually, the same problem arises again. Land is the "let's work with the system if it's an inevitability", obviously top two in terms of my interest. Deleuze is much further down, but still has some great insights. Guenon focused on issues I don't particularly care for beyond symbolism, not truly of use unless to build from his observations.

[Anonymous No.13144297]

Deleuze is the only real philosopher here
Land is bretty fun though

[Anonymous No.13144315]

>>13143127
agreed