[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 15 KB, 200x212, 995998.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13110075 No.13110075 [Reply] [Original]

*is a pseud*

>> No.13110088 [DELETED] 

I'm honestly sick and tired of butterfly mentioning me in posts to other people. If she's not going to put out, then she shouldn't even feign interest. :3

>> No.13110091

>>13110075
Why do you say that? I've only read his one essay on Accelerationism (https://moskvax.wordpress.com/2010/09/30/accelerationism-ray-brassier/)), and didn't understand much - does he misrepresent things, or just not have much of an original thought himself?

>> No.13110101

>>13110075
quite the opposite. the dude is in a league of his own and if he wasn't such an edgelord supreme who is perpetually pissed at academia he might have actually contributed something of lasting value to philosophy.

>> No.13110131
File: 534 KB, 1056x1296, Ray_Bradbury_(1975)_-cropped-.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13110131

>>13110075
>The “speculative realist movement” exists only in the imaginations of a group of bloggers promoting an agenda for which I have no sympathy whatsoever: actor-network theory spiced with pan-psychist metaphysics and morsels of process philosophy. I don’t believe the internet is an appropriate medium for serious philosophical debate; nor do I believe it is acceptable to try to concoct a philosophical movement online by using blogs to exploit the misguided enthusiasm of impressionable graduate students. I agree with Deleuze’s remark that ultimately the most basic task of philosophy is to impede stupidity, so I see little philosophical merit in a ‘movement’ whose most signal achievement thus far is to have generated an online orgy of stupidity.

>> No.13110205 [DELETED] 
File: 54 KB, 642x482, 99598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13110205

>>13110088
okay, this is epic

>> No.13110282

>>13110131
why do you always post this quote

>> No.13110296 [DELETED] 

>>13110205
It is kind of, and I know she's laughing at my posts.

>> No.13110572

>>13110282
he's Ray Brassier and mad about Harman being the only one who is relevant today

>> No.13110611

>>13110131
>"we need to keep minorities from gaining control of aesthetics"
-Ray Basedbury

>> No.13110731

>>13110572
ive never even heard of harman and i know brassier