[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 474 KB, 800x710, Pantheism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13057125 No.13057125 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.13057130

>>13057125
Because the multiplicity of entities is bullshit and anybody who takes a minute to think about it will understand why, that's why

>> No.13057414

>>13057130
what

>> No.13057458

>>13057130
This level of persuasive argumentation is the reason why I return to "/lit/ - Literature".

>> No.13057586

Einstein was a pantheist

>> No.13057593

>>13057130
AUTHENTICALLY BASED

>> No.13057618

>>13057130
>Because the multiplicity of entities is bullshit
by that token you are bullshit

>> No.13057634

It's because its true.

God is the Supreme Truth and Highest Reality.
In His own timeless dimension God exists all alone, as the unified totality of existence.

However, He also thinks(or dreams). And we are merely His Thoughts.

Being a divine thought means that in some sense, you yourself are God, as God is All.

The purpose of life then, is to realize this.

>> No.13057638

>>13057634
well shit, you just summed it up in 6 sentences. What am i supposed to do for the next 60 years you fuckin prick?

>> No.13058449

>>13057130
this is why deleuze is trash

>> No.13058497

>>13057125
I don't get what is so great about pantheism. Panpsychism, however, seems like the ethical default.

>> No.13058648

>>13057130
claims of the metaphysical existing or non-existing status of any entities or essence at all are assumptions and nothing more, nevermind claims about oneness vs multiplicity

>> No.13058702

>>13058648
That's just your assumption man.

>> No.13058712

>>13057634
>The purpose of life then, is to realize this.
Surely the mere realization of this idea is not the end. It’s not as if we are made completely aware of what God actually is, just as we know that 2 + 2 = 5. God would not be satisfied with this mere superficial knowledge

>> No.13058718

>>13058702
the entire field of metaphysics is just dick-stroking
any metaphysical claims one way or another are unfalsifiable conjecture

>> No.13058734

>>13057638
live blissfully

>> No.13058870

>>13057125
pantheism is gay
everyone knows that [specific sect of one religion] is the only true source of knowledge on creation, life, morality, and death
I know this because I happened to be born into it and indoctrinated from a young age
[deity] be praised

>> No.13058894

>>13058712
not that guy but implied in his statement was union consequent with that knowledge

>> No.13058910

>>13058718
>le unfalsifiable maymay

back to /sci/ bugbrain, go fuck a calculator

>> No.13058926

>>13058712
Ah yes, I actually have accepted mysticism but didn't want to go into that ITT right off the bat.

The thing with mysticism is if people can see God, why doesn't it happen frequently or you can't just see for your self? Well, it could be that it is a difficult and arduous path to tread upon to reach your goal...

>> No.13058948

>>13057125
only if its an idealist form, materialist forms of pantheism are basically just "wow bro I love science and nature"

>> No.13058976

>>13058910
materialism is unfalsifiable too
materialism is a metaphysical claim based on conjecture

>> No.13058994 [DELETED] 
File: 126 KB, 1026x602, 1555958220490.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13058994

Official eastern and late-antiquity Non-dual/Pantheist/Panentheist power ranking list *note, this is objective*

Advaita Vedanta > Sufism > Kashmir Shaivism > Neoplatonism > Jonang Buddhism > Daoism > Ch'an Buddhism > Vishishtadvaita Vedanta > Sikhism

>> No.13059067

PANTHEISM IS ILLUMINISTIC MATERIALISM.

>> No.13059093

>>13057125
well classical theism is kinda panthesitic
so theres quite the literature supporting it

also panthesim=/=immanence all the time

There isnt a dichotomy between Transcendence and Immanence

>> No.13059110
File: 189 KB, 640x960, 1555579578390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13059110

non-dualism > panentheism < pantheism

>> No.13059353

>>13057125
It’s not, and if you ever understand the first 1000 years of western thought you would know why.
Short short short version, disregarding paradox’s of motion, and lots of other things: to:dr there must be a first cause, singular.
>>13057130
This.

>> No.13060155

>>13057125
It's not, It's litteraly brainlet's first attempt to answering serious questions.

>> No.13060165

>>13060155
So what's brainlet's second attempt?

>> No.13060174

>>13059110

>> No.13060219
File: 28 KB, 327x499, IMG_7758.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060219

>>13060165

>> No.13060231

>>13059110
*> >

>> No.13060232

>>13060219
And finally, what's the third? Do they get it right?
>3rd time's the charm

>> No.13060241
File: 44 KB, 333x499, IMG_7759.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13060241

>>13060232
No they don't.
Nobody does.

>> No.13060252

>>13060241
So what is there to do?

>> No.13060257

>>13060252
Try again.
Then You discovered that trying in itself is the answer.
Then your cock starts to glow with the power of the galaxy.
It's pretty kino.

>> No.13060263

>>13060257
Based. I thought you might go there
Carry on, fren

>> No.13060281

>>13060263
You too, kind anon.

>> No.13060654

>>13060257
And there we have it, we arrive back at pantheism

>> No.13060828

>>13060232
>Do they get it right?
That's a stupid question after attempt 2, kiddo, and you should know why.