/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13054753]

What's /lit/'s IQ?

http://test.mensa.no/

[Anonymous No.13054770]

>>13054753
My iq is 122 but I have adhd and never finish these quizzes so it could be much higher

[Anonymous No.13054787]

>>13054753
119 the perfect place to galavant with the brainlets while maintaining an understanding of the patricians

[Anonymous No.13054788]

>>13054753
200 which also happens to be the length of my girlfriend's penis in millimeters

[Anonymous No.13054792]

If you pick up a book on math and repeat these tests you can manually raise your iq, you know that right?

[Anonymous No.13054803]

I’ve been tested in real life and got 142 but I don’t buy it.


Reading a lot and knowing how to sound smart inflates how smart you seem.

[Anonymous No.13054808]

>>13054792
>if you get more smarter your smartness number goes up
incredible

[Anonymous No.13054816]

It seems like I've set the bar in this thread quite high.

[Anonymous No.13054818]

>>13054770
>If I wasn't retarded it would be higher
Having a shit brain isn't an excuse

[Anonymous No.13054828]

>>13054808
His point was that people claim IQ tests can't be studied for. They are supposed to be the definitive measure of your intelligence. But learning math and computer science will increase your score on an IQ test.

[Anonymous No.13054841]

>>13054753
Not gonna waste my time again. Whenever I take this test the scores between 120-130

[Anonymous No.13054842]

>>13054792
i tried picking up some math books and doing some training with them but now my arms just hurt a lot and the test gave me an even lower score!!

[Anonymous No.13054843]

>>13054753
Either 122 or 129, I don't remember.

[Anonymous No.13054845]

>>13054828

[Anonymous No.13054858]

>>13054753
134. Socially retarded though so it balances out

[Anonymous No.13054904]

>>13054753
135

[Anonymous No.13054917]

>>13054816
You're just average
beyond 145 the numbers become unreliable and stop meaning much

[Anonymous No.13054919]

>>13054818
Or perhaps its further proof of how inadequate iq tests are at determining anything but your capacity to answer iq test questions

[Anonymous No.13054920]

>>13054753
Doesn't matter, I already no I is a genius

[Anonymous No.13054922]

>>13054753
>115 iq
>ran out of time and guessed 8 answers
I-i-im not retarded right guys haha? If I had an extra 5 minutes it would of been higher right?? haha

[Anonymous No.13054929]

>>13054917
Bullshit chart
How was data collected

[Anonymous No.13054939]

>>13054929
It was revealed in a dream

[Anonymous No.13054941]

>>13054922
>buying into some random link posted on a ukrainian agriculture forum
may-maybe your retarded haha?

[Anonymous No.13054944]

>>13054939
based

[Anonymous No.13054949]

>>13054929
The proof is left as an exercise for the reader.

[Anonymous No.13054950]

>>13054753
lost interest around halfway and started bullshitting the answers but still got 119

[Anonymous No.13054954]

>>13054753

[Anonymous No.13054964]

>>13054941
PROBABLY! But atleast I’m in the 86th percentile and smarter than all black people

[Anonymous No.13054969]

>>13054753
hi

[Anonymous No.13054972]

>online IQ tests
And pic related just to prove I’m not an assmad brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13054974]

A true IQ test isn't just these matrices, it involves interacting with someone qualified to give the exam; some of the things they'll ask you to do are:
-Remember increasingly long strings of random digits to failure
-Recite, within 30 seconds, as many words as possible that start with a certain letter
-Complete analogies
-Group separate sets of data as coherently as possible
etc. etc.

These online tests are as inaccurate as they come, and they don't correlate in any way with a proper IQ test, don't worry about your 'internet IQ score' and get on with your Saturday you maniacs

[Anonymous No.13054979]

>>13054753
Hahahaha! https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39

[Anonymous No.13054984]

It seems I've dropped 10 IQ points since last year. I was, at one point 120 IQ.

[Anonymous No.13054985]

u r all v clever

[Anonymous No.13054992]

>>13054984
Same anon took this test in grade 12 and scored 136
Got 115 3 years later

:(

[Anonymous No.13054999]

>>13054985
Thank you! Did polly want a cracker?

[Anonymous No.13055008]

How the fuck did I get 135, I'm an absolute retard

[Anonymous No.13055011]

>>13054979
xd
http://medium.com/desu/if-you-read-something-on-medium-its-probably-true/

[Anonymous No.13055017]

>>13054972
>>13054974
This

[Anonymous No.13055022]

>>13054917
Most tests don't even claim accuracy past 140. (Plus the general questions of whether IQ even measures g) Even the tests designed for high IQ still have a limit, which I have hit. Didn't stop me and uncle Ted from abandoning society for the neet life.

[Anonymous No.13055024]

>>13054917
Imagine actually believing any board has an above 105 average IQ.

[Anonymous No.13055032]

>>13055008

Well It's simple anon, you're one of the of most intelligent humans to have ever existed and this test here proves it when can I expect your magnum opus?

[Anonymous No.13055040]

>>13055011
Not an argument.

[Anonymous No.13055041]

>>13054917
And what would it be for /lit/ and /sci/ if you removed the people who don’t read and the ‘I fucking love science’ redditors respectively?

[Anonymous No.13055048]

I scored 126 on a psychologist andministered test, would have scored 130 but she was a qt and distracted me.

[Anonymous No.13055057]

>>13055022
Same. Hyperintelligent degenerate human trash unite! in death

[Anonymous No.13055064]

>>13055040
mmhm, that's wrong. I read it in the Daily Mail my matey.

[Anonymous No.13055066]

>>13055041
100

[Anonymous No.13055072]

>>13055041
>people who don't read
probably 120
>‘I fucking love science’ redditors
I don't think those can be tested

[Anonymous No.13055074]

>>13055064
You know what? You are riiiiiight IQ is suuuper important and people with high IQ are the most importantest.

[Anonymous No.13055077]

>>13055057
Yeah, you and Ted can keep the bombs though. Anprim isn't for me. I'm pretty happy watching it all from where I've got myself setup.

Also the name of that image is undercutting your claim.

[Anonymous No.13055087]

>>13055032
'my diary desu' will be published by the end of the year
But seriously, do people actually think that looking at coloured shapes is a measure of intelligence? Logic isn't all there is to it.

[Anonymous No.13055111]

110. Man, at each test my IQ is different.

[Anonymous No.13055113]

[Anonymous No.13055125]

>>13055077
ye-yeah my brain is too active so I can't spell properly
t. tested 150 iq depressive misanthropic faggot

[Anonymous No.13055128]

>>13054753
Got 125 and then 130. There are still a handful I can't seem to crack, I have trouble identifying the symmetry in those.
How do you 140fags do it ?

Also this kind of stuff always seem to rely on the same tricks, seem like if you see the full solutions once and practice a bit you ca score high on them all.

[Anonymous No.13055141]

>>13055074
see? exactly. you get my point anon. we are smart, trust me Mensa told me so

[Anonymous No.13055149]

>>13054753
129

[Anonymous No.13055176]

>>13054816
buddy if you're on 4chan you're a retard regardless of your IQ score

[Anonymous No.13055178]

>>13054753
I don't want to go through the trouble of taking another IQ test...
last time it was so harrowing and stressful to me that I forgot how to write for some time...
no thank you

[Anonymous No.13055190]

>>13055128
Did you consider adding/subtracting shapes from each other?

[Anonymous No.13055199]

>>13054753
Can I read Hegel now?

[Anonymous No.13055218]

>>13055178
it's oK anon, everyone has to practice before an exam, iQ is know different, just practise a few weeks before the exam, hey I heard anki is pretty good. Check out my mensa set i made on the shared decks page, you'll double your eq in no time.

[Anonymous No.13055233]

>>13055125
I used to make those kinds of errors too. They never seemed important enough to bother with. But the quality of your words are the only measure here.

[Anonymous No.13055239]

>>13054979
>Hahahaha! https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39

This is the only true answer.

Obsession with attaining a high IQ number, especially by unreliable measures, and belief that IQ accurately measures what in ordinary language is referred to as intelligence is just a proof that speaker has high IQ but low intelligence.

[Anonymous No.13055250]

>>13055190
I used that a lot, though admittedly not on the 5 questions I couldnt answer. Is that all there is to it ? Symmetries, rotations, similarities and superposition/substraction ? That would be anticlimactic.

[Anonymous No.13055251]

>>13055233
Aww damnit, "is". Of course I would now. In my defense, there is an untamed and noisy animal on me right now.

[Anonymous No.13055255]

>>13055250
Yes, even that last 'hard question', just flip the upper image in a column upside down and subtract the same colors with the image below

[Anonymous No.13055258]

Hell yeah. Also, does anyone know the solution to the last one? Looks like a bunch of meaningless bullshit to me.

[Anonymous No.13055267]

>>13055048
I've noticed psychologists tend to be total qts.

[Anonymous No.13055274]

>>13054972
>>13054974
Brainlets

[Anonymous No.13055276]

>>13054753
121. I'm Iranian btw.

[Anonymous No.13055285]

>120
At this level you can be a high-functioning member of society
>130
At this level you have the potential to rise to the top of society and accumulate enormous wealth and power
>140
At this level you start displaying deviancy and may come across as eccentric.
>150
At this level you are a barely functional degenerate living on the edge of society. The greatest artists fall into this range.
>160
At this level you may struggle with basic survival and only your vivid internal monologue keeps you alive.
>170
At this level you start making bombs.

[Anonymous No.13055291]

>>13054753
https://vocaroo.com/i/s0mpww9HBDlD

[Anonymous No.13055295]

>>13055239
>But the magic number makes me better than everyone else

[Anonymous No.13055298]

>>13055239
Haha, Taleb?! He is just mad about the low scores he keeps getting.

[Anonymous No.13055301]

>>13055285
>>13054753
Even though I got a 121 IQ, I don't care. Classical logic cannot answer ontological questions, and thus, your obsession with abstract reasoning is flawed. Paraconsistent logic is more well-suited in dealing with questions pertaining to being and the nature of things. You basically want to be like a computer that can do vast computations, but there are certain things in life that do not neatly fit our "conceptualizations", especially when based on rigid truth vs. false binary.

Wisdom and contemplation are more important than reasoning skills, and this society is fundamentally a sick one. Thus, being "well-adjusted" does not mean much.

[Anonymous No.13055304]

>>13054792
>>13054828
post a source

[Anonymous No.13055316]

138, not that IQ matters or is any way indicative of your intelligence. Most autistic people (see: complete retards in everything but abstraction) are high IQ, which should tell you all you need to know.

[Anonymous No.13055328]

>>13055258
see
>>13055255

[Anonymous No.13055332]

>>13055258
Jesus christ, are people really this stupid? It was a shape game a literal two year old could do. Yes, wittle anon, you flip the shape at the top and substract it from the shape directly under it to get the shape in the last box. These are the people I talk to when I am on lit... ey yey yey.

[Anonymous No.13055335]

>>13055316
>Most autistic people are high IQ
That isn't true, do some research
You're thinking of savants, which are far rarer than autists

[Anonymous No.13055348]

>>13055332
>pretending to have solved it himself
Ok brainlet hahahahahha

[Anonymous No.13055349]

>>13054753
Any books that talk about people with super-genius 160+ IQs? Ever since getting Ted-pilled, I've been fascinated by them. Being able to get "inside the mind" sounds interesting.

[Anonymous No.13055354]

>>13055301
>Classical logic cannot answer ontological questions
yes it can.

[Anonymous No.13055369]

>>13055348
I am
>>13055316

[Anonymous No.13055372]

>>13055354
Found the brainlet

[Anonymous No.13055380]

>>13055354
How?

[Anonymous No.13055398]

>>13055354
Most good metaphysics eventually lead to disrupting oppositions, such as real/unreal, mind/matter, and subject/object. That is, aspects of either pole slip across both sides, like a contradictory interweaving movement. It is a kind of aporia and blur between truth and falsehood, and makes you question the very principle of the opposition.

[Anonymous No.13055399]

108

[Anonymous No.13055407]

>>13055255
>Colors
He means 'subtract'/clear intersecting lines. Well seen nonetheless.

[Anonymous No.13055422]

>>13054753
>http://test.mensa.no/

I'm either very smart or very stupid. Probably the latter.

[Anonymous No.13055437]

>>13055335
Autistic people specifically with Aspergers. I thought this was obvious. People with Asperger's syndrome have normal to above-average intelligence but typically have difficulties with social interactions and often have pervasive, absorbing interests in special topics.

[Anonymous No.13055439]

>>13055332
For someone with such a high IQ/proclivity for pattern recognition, you are unusually insecure and euphorically maniacal over such a tiny triumph (I mean the two year old comparison and baby talk). It's okay anon, you're smart. Now it's time to actually use that hardware and actually cultivate it.

[Anonymous No.13055441]

I'm too intelligent, my IQ is beyond the test.

[Anonymous No.13055450]

>>13055407
Yes, exactly

Also, should I text and apologise to my 'ex' whom I have scared away with childish and autistic behavior?

[Anonymous No.13055471]

>>13055450
Yes. Unless you have ulterior motives/an agenda for apologising.

[Anonymous No.13055478]

>>13055332
have sex

[Anonymous No.13055484]

>>13055471
I secretly hope she will talk to me again, if that is this ulterior motive you mean. If you mean that I do this to get her in bed, then no, I don't

[Anonymous No.13055488]

>>13054984
I've done 2 IQ test in my life, one because of my parents when I was 10, I had 155 IQ, one when I got 20, I now have 122.
I probably lost most of these points because of weed in high school, but I'm now happier than before, social anxiety gone so I now have friend
I can tell you, being dumb is a bless.

[Anonymous No.13055493]

>>13055372
>>13055380
Classical logic is just a different language in which to "reason". To deny that truth can be found in classical logic is to deny that truth can be found in language, which is to say that, you admit that everything you write is unreasonable, and I wont disagree with that!

[Anonymous No.13055494]

>>13055274
What did you get anon? How does it compare to your actual tested IQ? How does this online test compare with the real one you’ve taken?

[Anonymous No.13055499]

>>13055439
>euphorically maniacal
what do you expect, on the anonymous 4channel?

[Anonymous No.13055517]

>>13055493
unironically this

[Anonymous No.13055520]

>>13055493
>To deny that truth can be found in classical logic is to deny that truth can be found in language
Certain ontological questions go beyond basic truth/false dichotomies.

“Whereof one can not speak thereof one must be silent.” (Wittgenstein)

[Anonymous No.13055528]

>>13055484
Talk to you again for what purpose? Romantic? Platonic? I mean, yes, you should apologise to people you have wronged, just try not to lie to yourself about your motives is all. Also, know that apologies can sometimes be narcissistic, in that some people are just uncomfortable with being viewed as 'the bad guy' and don;t care at all about reconciliation, or ameliorating the other person's hurt. Not saying that's you, just be aware of yourself. But yeah, nothing wrong with apologising for wronging someone.

[Anonymous No.13055550]

>>13055528
Romantic probably. She broke off contact after intense dating, because I hardly showed any affection/emotion (even though I really loved her and enjoyed every moment of her presence). Then I got childishly angry because 'she did not understood me', etc. I overreacted and 1. feel guilty for it 2. hope to get another chance.
Also, I don't quite feel like she sees me as the bad guy. Thanks for your /adv/ise

[Anonymous No.13055557]

reading and studying will improve this, r-right?

[Anonymous No.13055571]

>>13055520
yeah, CERTAIN ontological truths. The post in which I was replying to said "Classical logic cannot answer ontological questions", which is to say "no ontological question can be answered using language", which is blatantly wrong, and a total misrepresentation of Wittigenstein.

[Anonymous No.13055573]

>>13055550
I mean, I'm not going to pretend this can be solved on a Cambodian knitting forum. I know nothing about you, her, or the nature of your relationship, nor do I have the endurance, or delusion to pretend I can gauge them here. It sounds like many things were left unsaid on your part, so I guess communication can't hurt. Try not to have any expectations going into it though.

[Anonymous No.13055582]

>>13054753
I had to finish 77% of the way through because my matchmaking game just popped up and I scored 121. Last time I did an IQ test I got 134 so this seems about right.

[Anonymous No.13055585]

>When his IQ is less than 135

[Anonymous No.13055607]

>>13055573
True, anyways thanks

[Anonymous No.13055611]

>>13055557
No. Visual/pattern recognition games will help with this though.

But a measurement of pattern recognition and visual acuity is not a good measurement for general intelligence.

[Anonymous No.13055617]

>>13054753
My 5 year old just got a 95. Is that good or should I just give up and try for a new one?

[Anonymous No.13055627]

>>13055571
I was not precise in my original post. I meant classical logic cannot answer MOST ontological questions. It can maybe answer a few non-crucial ones, that's it.

[Anonymous No.13055628]

>online IQ tests
I got 123 on this, but when I took a real one it was 132
These puzzles were only part of the battery I took which tested many other things than just 2d pattern recognition.

[Anonymous No.13055636]

>>13055291
> when you score below 100 so you try to convince yourself it's ok

[Anonymous No.13055658]

Reminder that Richard Feynman, one of the most important physicists in recent history, only had an IQ of 125. Don't let a number get you down anons. :)

[Anonymous No.13055659]

>>13055291
>Doesn't know that most autists have high iq

[Anonymous No.13055667]

So, from what I remember reading, there's the claim amongst psychometricians that Raven's matrices/"culturally fair" pattern recognition IQ tests can't be 'learned', or at the very least, are more resistant to gaming them through study. This is somewhat counter-intuitive in my view, since there are patterns to the mechanics of pattern recognition itself. Simply memorising a few mechanisms (eg: add/subtract shapes, rotate shapes, clear/subtract intersections, etc) and doing enough of them to the point where your intuition tells you which mechanism is more likely to be at play for any given matrices, will save you time and likely improve your score. Are there really any studies proving significant improvements (ie: probably above one standard dev) can;t be made?

[Anonymous No.13055681]

>>13055291
Based 21st century Italian nobleman

[Anonymous No.13055698]

Took it before, got 134

[Anonymous No.13055704]

>>13055291
>pattern recognition doesn't matter and its structural essence has no (almost) universally transferable qualities
Fucking WEW you dumb guido.
>>13055681
keked profusely

[Anonymous No.13055708]

>>13054753
Reminder that online IQ tests have no validity whatsoever

[Anonymous No.13055723]

>>13055708
Why? Why would a Raven's matrices test administered by some low IQ counsellor be any more legitimate than an online test (especially a reputable one behind a pay wall)? Also, many standardised test scores correlate pretty well with IQ scores and so would these low-effort tests. Margins for errors sure, but far from "no validity" whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.13055762]

I got 119 but I'm baked

[Anonymous No.13055786]

>>13054753
IQ tests, let alone online IQ tests, are absolute nonsense.

Pic related is my result from a test taken just now, and I’m a fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.13055808]

113, but I got bored after 66 percent and just pressed finish

[Anonymous No.13055825]

>>13055808
Part of what IQ tests is your willingness to put up with pointless tedium. This isn't exactly what most would say is intelligence but it is obviously correlated with certain ways of success.

[Anonymous No.13055848]

>>13055291
What kind of person do you have to be to post vocaroos instead of just typing?

[Anonymous No.13055950]

>>13055825
The same goes in alot of physical abilities tests

[Anonymous No.13056023]

Haha, I'm defo not insecure about my intelligence by posting this!! This online test LEGIT just proves how smart I am, right guys? xD

[Anonymous No.13056026]

>>13055617
leave him in the forest and go for another one

[Anonymous No.13056038]

>>13054753
yeah I win

[Anonymous No.13056041]

>>13056038
> Too retarded to actually get a valid score

[Anonymous No.13056046]

>>13056038
me too
tfw to smart for this test

[Anonymous No.13056049]

>>13056046
yasssss

>>13056041
im actually a genius (smart person)

[Anonymous No.13056060]

>>13056049
You're either so retarded your IQ is astronomically high or low. Either way you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.13056079]

>>13055786
Isn't Mensa's whole schtick telling people they are smart so they pay money in exchange for validation?

[Anonymous No.13056083]

>>13056060
my IQ too high bro

[Anonymous No.13056091]

>>13056060
second guy here, i was smart enough spam the middle button continuously and this is what happened
the iq of a person who does such a thing is unmeasurable

[Anonymous No.13056343]

>>13056079
>The Mensa Admission Test costs $40, takes two hours, and consists of two separate exams: the Mensa Wonderlic® and the Mensa Admission Test. Anyone scoring in the 98th percentile or higher on either gains the right to pay $70 per year for membership.

Spot on anon, absolute shit show cashing in on people’s insecurities and painful need for validation.

[Anonymous No.13056367]

>>13056091
kek

[Anonymous No.13056480]

>>13054753
I scored around the same as you in highschool and skipped the last 3 questions because it took a fucking hour

[Anonymous No.13056511]

>>13056480
This test isn't that long.

[Anonymous No.13056520]

120 on this test, 107 on one i took from a high school psychologist

[Anonymous No.13056530]

I've done every single iq test that I can find online and I've done this particular meme test 5 times and my iq is consistently between 100 and 110
I guess I am retarded but then again if I wasn't I wouldn't be here

[Anonymous No.13056533]

>>13055627
All that that means is everything that makes ontology useful is beyond us, which means ontology is pretty much obsolete, which is correct!

[Anonymous No.13056624]

>>13054753
>not linking the superior, more accurate online IQ test

[Anonymous No.13056642]

>>13055291
stop reply with audios it's not funny and it will never catch on. the constant swearing that you pass as comedy just denotes how inarticulate you are
also I've been keeping track of all your posts since that one time you posted on /tv/
I'm on to you nigger

[Anonymous No.13056752]

Almost all the ones that i have donde i end up being between 125 and 135. But most of the time is 128-129.

[Anonymous No.13056822]

>>13054929
The chart is from before /his/ was a board, you weren't here yet

[Anonymous No.13057302]

>>13054969
Same here

[Anonymous No.13057314]

>>13054842
underrated

[Anonymous No.13057315]

>>13055441
Based supergenius

[Anonymous No.13057318]

>>13055176
underrated post

[Anonymous No.13057324]

>>13055825
Nice to hear that obedience is correlated with high intelligence.

[Anonymous No.13057329]

>>13057324
Don't be so reductive, anon.

[Anonymous No.13057334]

>>13054753
I just guess about 1/3 of the way though and still got 117, calls into question how good the test is

[Anonymous No.13057336]

>>13054917
>Weishaupts Plateau
everytime

[Anonymous No.13057401]

>>13056533
No, it just means different forms of logic are useful depending on context.

[Anonymous No.13057436]

does someone with an iq of 140 have a better chance at being wiser and more at peace than someone with an iq of 100?

[Anonymous No.13057447]

>>13055762
I got 89 but I'm naked. So literally fuck me.

[Anonymous No.13057474]

>>13057329
Well I retook it. The later ones got very tricky.

[Anonymous No.13057539]

Got 123 first, then 110 by retrying, i am also quite drunk right now.

[Anonymous No.13057544]

>another IQ thread

[Anonymous No.13057560]

>>13054974
it measures raw pattern finding ability, which is highly correlated with IQ.

[Anonymous No.13057570]

taken this one 2 times already about a year ago. I got 133 the first time. This is my current score

[Anonymous No.13057607]

>>13057436
no, you only start realizing on a deeper level just how meaningless everything is. The deeper you can process the world around you, the deeper your depression will be when it inevitably rears it head.

[Anonymous No.13057659]

>>13057607
I honestly don't understand how people go on with their daily life. None of the work you do is influencing the world to any noticeable degree. Not even as a phd student in STEM. 90% of all dissertations are just swept under the rug never to be looked at again, except maybe in some very niche field or application.
We've got millions of minds churning through the same problems every day, what would make you think you are somehow meaningful in any way?
I pity some of my professors, who think their babble actually matters. What is all this for? Some great ideal we're apparently all striving for, but I can't seem to figure out what it's supposed to be.
In our current state there's nothing we can do as a species. We're not developed far enough to deal with the challenges that we have created for ourselves.
in other words: fuck people for being too smart for their own good.

[Anonymous No.13057736]

I used to score 130s in my late teens but I'm now 29 and just scored 117. Is my brain getting worse at things or does being in school prime your brain for these sorts of tests? I feel way less retarded than I did when I was young but that might mean I'm just more retarded than I was.

[Anonymous No.13057929]

>>13054753
Nice

[Anonymous No.13057956]

I smell my own farts and try to guess what I had for lunch.

[Anonymous No.13057960]

106 and why I'm not gonna make it

[Anonymous No.13057977]

>>13057960
I believe in you, anon.

[Anonymous No.13058026]

Ok

[Anonymous No.13058036]

I got 131 when I took the test.

[Anonymous No.13058056]

>>13057659
You're right but also too caught up in ideals. The purpose of a good job is not to change society as a whole, simply to introduce some small local improvement.

Of course most jobs arent good jobs.