[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 99 KB, 615x615, 1554955516884.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031569 No.13031569 [Reply] [Original]

Who was right?

>> No.13031574
File: 42 KB, 724x120, 2DBA0DF4-DF3D-4A8B-8886-7970BBFEFAE8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031574

What do you think?

>> No.13031579

Plato, Jesus, and Guenon. Not any of those satanic postmodern neomarxist hacks that's for sure.

>> No.13031584
File: 83 KB, 850x400, quote-the-misconception-which-has-haunted-philosophic-literature-throughout-the-centuries-alfred-north-whitehead-46-31-14 (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031584

>>13031574

>> No.13031594

>>13031584


Objectively that may or may not be true but it is objectively through that you are in my field of perception nothing but an aspect of my own subjective experience and a phenomena generated by my own mind and therefore are nothing but my own self nature and I am doing not but analyzing my own mental intentionality by this very current act.


I make no objective claim as to the reality or relation of things in themselves for doubt can exist in these, rather I am objectively giving you the truth of my own perception of my own perception.


You are nothing to me but an aspect of my own perception and are just another data point, kiddo.

>> No.13031596

everyone, no one

>> No.13031607

Peirce, it was Peirce.

>> No.13031621
File: 289 KB, 564x501, 1554998740450.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031621

Why Late Witty, of course

>> No.13031626

>>13031594
you do not exist in a vacuum. your perception is constructed by what is around you and what you encounter. the language you use and think in is a language of other people.

>> No.13031649

>>13031569
deleuze

>> No.13031662

>>13031626

At birth this was not so and it was only my perception of language which shaped my use of language, it was only my perception of these prior arrangements which allowed them to influence me on my own terms according to my own perception of them.


And by my own analysis I have stripped even these traps, these languages of power for I have become as if one to whom the world if it dissolves would be unaffected once that same regard though language changes and is ever influenced my internal nature is always ever fed by not the objective world but the world as perceived through my perception and always will be nothing but this. Can you contemplate even your own experience of anything without truly accounting for your perception of the thing? You are nothing but another data point by which my ego seeks to organize, bucko

>> No.13031795
File: 94 KB, 700x700, 30-pepe-trump.w700.h700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031795

>>13031574
/pol/
/pol is always right

>> No.13031797

>>13031662
faggot

>> No.13031831
File: 14 KB, 250x253, C7E9424B-A40A-48E5-AD3E-FEAB3B91A5B2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13031831

>>13031569

>> No.13031863

>>13031594
>what the fuck did i just say to me &c

>> No.13031885

>>13031662
Deep solipsist brainlet

>> No.13031950

>>13031797

Indubitably you sir are the faggot according to my perceptions.


>>13031885

I take no stance on the objective world’s reality or lack thereof I can only accurately say with absolute clarity the contents of my own perception AS I perceive them and as such if you cannot provide a argument against this approach you yourself are the brainlet.

>> No.13033682

Bump

>> No.13034468
File: 26 KB, 363x501, monocle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13034468

Okay, I don't really read but I'll still answer.
So Heidegger was all about Being, and being true to yourself. That's correct. Wittgenstein was pretty cool talking about math and shit, language shouldn't be considered correct. It's a flawed tool to communicate abstractions which is correct. Wittgenstein was pretty correct. I only know that one dude from space-taoism threads. Deuluze was also correct, but not about identity, imagine yourself as a small rhizome within a rhizome and that rhizome is within an even bigger Plotinian rhizomic All. Maybe that's his philosophy and I'm just being dumb. Basically I'm a 19 year old not really getting what I'm saying, hahah. Hold up, let me self reflect through my monocle. A yes, cringe. A prime example. Snap and spank a butt.

>> No.13034482

A synthesis of everyone but Heidegger which pivots on the notion of Immanence.

>> No.13034500

>>13034482
Why Wittgenstein?

>> No.13034508

Heidegger is sympathetic, but Deleuze ultimately makes the most sense. Thats not necessarily a consoling thought. I feel like Heidegger was a neurotic depressive that was trying to console himself through philosophy for his lost German catholic world. Deleuze in comparison is the manic coke addict that doesn't give a shit.

>> No.13034525

>>13034500
The notion of necessity grounded in contingency implicit in PI is also at the core of Deleuze's metaphysics. I recommend A.W. Moore, History of Metaphysics for more information. Relevant blog post here as well:

https://fluxofthought.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/wittgenstein-realist/

>> No.13034543

>>13034508
Deleuze was a nerd the only drug he did was alcohol.

>> No.13034548
File: 41 KB, 411x612, 541799811-612x612.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13034548

none, but he was

>> No.13034815

not heidegger

>> No.13035272

bump

>> No.13036141
File: 36 KB, 200x237, smug hamann.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13036141

>>13031569
>t. never read any of them, only knows about them from sp*Ce taoism threads

>> No.13036145 [DELETED] 

>>13034468
>I don't really read
>Evola pic
Why am I not surprised?

>> No.13036158 [DELETED] 

can you out yourself as brainlet better than by posting the token analytic everyone chooses for these kinds of things

>> No.13036162

>>13031569
can you out yourself as brainlet better than by posting the token analytic everyone chooses for these kinds of things

>> No.13036168

>>13036162
fucking based