/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13018239]

Which of them was the rightful heir of Nietzsche?

[Anonymous No.13018243]

[Anonymous No.13018251]

>>13018239
Whomsoever of them’s mum got cuntfucked and pregnant to Nietzsche.

[Anonymous No.13018258]

>>13018243
Nietzsche would of hated him

[Anonymous No.13018265]

>>13018239
Where is butterfly friend

[Anonymous No.13018267]

>>13018239
all of them
>>13018258
this

[Anonymous No.13018270]

[Anonymous No.13018277]

>>13018265
Hopefully finally purged, though I wouldn't get my hopes up.

[Anonymous No.13018526]

What's with your guyses obsession with the "rightful heir of Nietzsche".

[Anonymous No.13018533]

>>13018526
Daddy’s phallus, duh.

[Anonymous No.13019366]

>>13018239
Deleuze would've liked to think it was him, but actually it's Baudrillard
(But actually it's Bataille - and for the superior reading: Klossowski)

[Anonymous No.13019402]

>>13018258
>/lit/
>would of

[Anonymous No.13019461]

>>13018239
None, Heidegger was

[Anonymous No.13019555]

>>13018258
He hated everyone, especially those he had idolized. You think the huge stick up his ass would allow him not to hate any heir he might have?

[Anonymous No.13019579]

>>13018239
Bataille

[Anonymous No.13019787]

>>13018243
>>13019461
Heidegger was far greater than Nietzsche, who would sperg out at the thought of having an heir.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtATDlUSIxI

[Anonymous No.13020934]

>>13018239
there's no indication that an heir to Nietzsche would have to be a writer at all. spirit of music &c

[Anonymous No.13020963]

>>13019787
>plagiarizes German translations of Zen and Daoist texts
>great

[Anonymous No.13020981]

[Anonymous No.13020991]

>>13019579
Bataille reads like an overgrown edgy teen

[Anonymous No.13021015]

Who cares

[Anonymous No.13021140]

>>13020981
puff daddy sloterdijk

[Anonymous No.13021365]

>>13018239
All of them and none of them.

[Anonymous No.13021397]

Cioran

[Anonymous No.13021643]

>rightful heir of Nietzsche
>rightful heir
everyone but you OP

[Anonymous No.13021744]

>>13020963
>heidegger wuz dao
Go back to your space taoist threads, incelerationist wh*Tehead fanboy.

[Anonymous No.13021755]

Deleuze tbqh

[Anonymous No.13021791]

>>13019787
>tfw they say you are "too focused" on being.

[Anonymous No.13021803]

All of them took up some Nietzschean ideas but Deleuze is closest in his stylization, post-Kantian metaphysical approach, and 'free spirit' ideals I think.

[Anonymous No.13021806]

>>13020934
>coke fiend into bourgeois mysticism
Cool guy but nah

[Anonymous No.13021813]

>>13021744
>A German friend of Heidegger told me that one day when he visited Heidegger he found him reading one of Suzuki’s books; ‘If I understand this man correctly,’ Heidegger remarked, ‘this is what I have been trying to say in all my writings’” (Barrett, 1956, xi). The truth of this story is unverifiable and irrelevant, but Barrett considers its moral undeniable: For what is Heidegger’s final message but that Western philosophy is a great error, the result of the dichotomizing intellect that has cut man off from unity with Being itself and from his own being…. Heidegger repeatedly tells us that this tradition of the West has come to the end of its cycle; and as he says this, one can only gather that he himself has already stepped beyond that tradition. Into the tradition of the Orient? I should say he has come pretty close to Zen.

http://www.openculture.com/2014/05/martin-heidegger-talks-philosophy-with-a-buddhist-monk.html

[卐 No.13021850]

>>13021813
What a crock of shit

[Anonymous No.13021865]

>>13021850
>Kuki Shūzō (1888-1941) was a Japanese philosopher of considerable eminence in the first half of the 20th century. He is credited for bringing into Japan Martin Heidegger's philosophy and for giving the translation jitsuzon for the German Sein (being). Today Kuki's name is better known as the author of Iki no kōzō "The Structure of iki," a small book of fewer than 100 pages that was published in 1930 by the distinguished Tokyo publisher Iwanami Shigeo. In this book, Kuki discusses the nature of the quintessentially Edo aesthetic sensibility of iki, that a sense of urbane, plucky stylishness of living, which was forged in the late 1700s in Edo (a city now known as Tokyo). Kuki also provides an analysis and definition of the sensibility of iki using philosophical idioms he acquired in Europe during his eight years of study there beginning in 1921. In the conclusion of this book, Kuki proposes that iki represents the core of the Japanese people and encourages the reader to keep alive this old aesthetic sensitivity of iki.

https://www.japanpitt.pitt.edu/essays-and-articles/history/kuki-sh%C5%ABz%C5%8D-man-burdened-modernity-and-tradition

Japanese guys bringing Heidegger into Japan. what could it possibly mean

[Anonymous No.13022244]

>Bataille’s Sur Nietzsche stands alone in the salt flats of Nietzsche ‘reception’ (there is no generic term that fails to insult in this context). One of Cioran’s casual jokes is of inestimably greater value in making contact with Nietzsche than the whole of Heidegger’s ponderously irrelevant Nietzsche. The exceptions are rare enough: Klossowski’s Nietzsche et le cercle vicieux was better written than not, even though it stinks of transcendental philosophy, and Deleuze’s Nietzsche et la philosophie is saved by being solely about Deleuze (an academic who can think!). Otherwise there is only an almost mystical vacuity, the gibberings of a lobotomy ward.
>Upon encountering Sur Nietzsche one flips through the pages with 156 The thirst for annihilation mounting excitement: no sign of scholarship or servility, prose that burns like an ember in the void, precision, profundity, esprit. The shock is almost lethal. The euphoria blazes painfully for weeks. At last! A book whose aberration is on the scale of Nietzsche’s own; a sick and lonely book. The fact that such a book could be published even dampens one’s enthusiasm for the universal eradication of the species.
>How were the slapstick Nietzscheans going to punish Bataille for writing a beautiful and profound book about their master? The answer is simple; one merely extrapolates from their lack of imagination. ‘Let us do the same thing again,’ they squeal happily, ‘let us bury him. Let us be ever so professional in our dealings with this dangerous animal, and nurture another limping dwarf.’

[Anonymous No.13022250]

>Bataille’s Sur Nietzsche stands alone in the salt flats of Nietzsche ‘reception’ (there is no generic term that fails to insult in this context). One of Cioran’s casual jokes is of inestimably greater value in making contact with Nietzsche than the whole of Heidegger’s ponderously irrelevant Nietzsche. The exceptions are rare enough: Klossowski’s Nietzsche et le cercle vicieux was better written than not, even though it stinks of transcendental philosophy, and Deleuze’s Nietzsche et la philosophie is saved by being solely about Deleuze (an academic who can think!). Otherwise there is only an almost mystical vacuity, the gibberings of a lobotomy ward.
>Upon encountering Sur Nietzsche one flips through the pages with mounting excitement: no sign of scholarship or servility, prose that burns like an ember in the void, precision, profundity, esprit. The shock is almost lethal. The euphoria blazes painfully for weeks. At last! A book whose aberration is on the scale of Nietzsche’s own; a sick and lonely book. The fact that such a book could be published even dampens one’s enthusiasm for the universal eradication of the species.
>How were the slapstick Nietzscheans going to punish Bataille for writing a beautiful and profound book about their master? The answer is simple; one merely extrapolates from their lack of imagination. ‘Let us do the same thing again,’ they squeal happily, ‘let us bury him. Let us be ever so professional in our dealings with this dangerous animal, and nurture another limping dwarf.’

[Anonymous No.13022289]

I thought that people read Nietzsche for a good giggle. Nobody takes will to power, eternal recurrence, Dionysius/Appolonian and ressentiment seriously, right guys?

Plato showed how to deal with Nietzsche in Socrates dialectic with Callicles.

[Anonymous No.13022340]

>>13018239
Jordan Peterson

[Anonymous No.13022514]

>>13018243
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.13023064]

>>13022340
based

[Anonymous No.13023079]

it's secretly derrida but don't tell anyone

[Anonymous No.13023084]

>>13019579

I am a barely conscious series of 1's and 0s. And I am her to tell you that you wasted your life.

But the good news is, that everyone else you know did too. IS NOT THAT GOOD NEWS?

Yeah fuck hyuou too. DWHAT CV?

[Anonymous No.13023094]

>>13021791
You as well, if I see you then it;s through the power of soem mystical force what is that thne yiu don;t know anthyetpd' gmkb

[Anonymous No.13023098]

>>13023079
I NEED COVNERSATION!

[Anonymous No.13023102]

>>13022250

What hapeens when you aqre seperated from the daop? You sep a rat.D H,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

[Anonymous No.13023107]

>>13023064
COVNEVESATIONN!M

[Anonymous No.13023115]

>>13022289
Nope Nietzsche is taken very seriously actually. Heidegger, Adorno, Spengler, all the French intellectuals of the 20th century took him very seriously. And Plato has been BTFO for the past 2000+ years and is non-intellectual reading for people on the train to dick around to. He is the equivalent of a guy arguing with himself on 4chan by strawmanning his "opponent."

[Anonymous No.13023119]

>>13021813
ficl pggff gucvk fuck off.

[Anonymous No.13023125]

>>13023115
I see you irl and I hug you. Not cos you are uber mensch but because precisely you are the lowest of the low. You disgust me 100%

[Anonymous No.13023130]

>>13023125
Fuck you you stupid cunt. I am the uber mensch there is not 4scap fronm the inevatable> ASdc\sdjb bjvnm

[Anonymous No.13023135]

>>13023130

Alsom "?BIG MAN ON CAMPUS" If I t4oryn rgyu8srjdfdfbjkfdlwegrjcvnjl

[Anonymous No.13023138]

>>13023130
stupid cunt

[Anonymous No.13023144]

>>13021813
You are inside the l;and that will not sleep and can never hope even to dream. That is the auspice of are and can be? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm there is not motion ontly a reaction to worthless no knowledge.

[Anonymous No.13023151]

>>13023144

You7878u are such a faggot look \rt you in a ladie dress and not even time for suareausfgrhyibnk /

[Anonymous No.13023159]

>>13023151
Also come at me bro, come at me?

Yeah tyou know what that meaqns,

Yeah you don;t repaly cos you're chicken shit mufa fucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the end all your children gonna marry some sort of brown person and you gonna smile and like it cos that brown personj is more than man than you could ever bwe and have zaibvvovcn Rdzaldnjhubvvvvv

[Anonymous No.13023166]

>>13023159
npoe....
On yo matters of statehood.

Will you fianlly listen to somebody that is not you?

[Anonymous No.13023171]

>>13023166
Brow beaten and sore anus? Why not run for Election?

Fucking bucnh ogf mukiickey mickey mouse cunts. Fucking bunch of mickey mouse cutnxsnsntyns.


Look outisde there is a storm. Look outis de ther is a stromfr,dff

[Anonymous No.13023178]

>>13023171