[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 279 KB, 2500x1875, D99AB107-1932-43C5-9719-BD010BB244DF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12991768 No.12991768 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a right or wrong way to read Philosophy? Does reading the text 2-3 times and approaching it differently work best? Should I read the whole text in one sitting or is it ok to spread it out?

>> No.12991783

>>12991768
to adequately answer your questions about how to read philosophy you would have to read philosophy

>> No.12991805

Doesnt matter how you read it only that you understand it. I find it extremely helpful to write a paragraph like I'm explaining what I've read to someone, as if I'm arguing from the point of view of the author.

>> No.12991810

>>12991783
I read philosophy I just want to affirm that I am not missing out on a more efficient way to get a better understanding of the texts. Once I can understand them immensely I can make more coherent arguments. I realize there is no shortcut around the texts but just asking for tips

>> No.12991920

>>12991805
>Tfw can understand the texts but have a hard time making interesting discussions or claims in class

Is this normal for a newbie undergrad?

>> No.12992008

>>12991920
You can break up understanding a philosophical idea into 2 parts: the ability to comprehend the subject, and the ability to talk about it. I found I could fairly easily grasp an author's point, but when it came to discussing it, my mind was blank. That's where writing a short paragraph about it becomes very useful. You're essentially paraphrasing what you've read, consolidating the ideas in your head. Keep notes while reading if you have to, especially if it's a long book.