[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-06-09: Search is working again.
2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/lit/ - Literature


View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 176 KB, 1488x837, worldsmainstage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12986474 No.12986474 [Reply] [Original]

How can you tell an author didn't adequately world build (if at all?)

>> No.12986484

Just compare them to Tolkien. Any """world""" with less effort than his is garbage.

>> No.12986545

>>12986474
The best kind of world-building is that which gives you a peak into an imagined space, but never the full picture. I think the problem with a lot of fantasy and sci-fi fiction is that it overinvests in the idea that more detail=more immersion, when in fact its usually the experience of ambiguity in a text that draws you in further. World-building should serve the narrative in such a way that you only see just enough to help explain why events happen the way they do. Go into too much detail and you lose the mystery

>> No.12986548
File: 6 KB, 250x231, A09BC6B3-08BE-405D-BD1F-A633DA122B5C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12986548

>world building

>> No.12986676

>>12986484
Yes, the kid who wrote Eragorn also developed a language!

>> No.12986686

If “world building” is a metric at all that you’re using to evaluate a book, then you’re wrong. You should try a different hobby like graphic novels or video games.

>> No.12986718

is this what happens when engineers are allowed to read fiction? they have to evaluate everything as a functioning system of parts?

>> No.12986861

>>12986718
Well yeah. Otherwise it's not a believable world and then the reader won't be drawn into the work.

>>12986686
So what should a book be evaluated on? Its cover?

>> No.12986996

>>12986474
When there are internal inconsistencies with the world’s logic that wasn’t intentional.

World building is a retarded metric to measure books by though. Obsession with world building is why I can’t stand sci-fi.

>> No.12987094

>>12986996
But everybody says it's what makes Lord of the Rings and A Song of Ice and Fire so great. Not to mention the people in my writing groups who insist you need to have at least 5 generations of each character's past and know who takes out the garbage in your world "otherwise the reader will know you half-assed it."

>> No.12987117

>>12987094
I think that’s why I’m writing my own fantasy sci-fi novel with minimal attention paid to world building—A way of “correcting the record” of sorts. I want to focus more on characters, prose and narrative themes because I feel that’s what really matters.

>>
Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action