[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 15 KB, 220x310, 220px-Heidegger_2_(1960).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12922348 No.12922348 [Reply] [Original]

Why his work is never being discussed on this board? Do we feel resentment towards him due to his connections with national socialists?

>> No.12922353

/lit/ isn't really intelligent enough to understand him, very few are. And those who do, simply are.

>> No.12922376

>>12922348
This board is too invaded by /pol/ to have resentments towards him because of the nazi stuff. It's mostly just due to brainletism, given the threads on this guy I've been in and the level of discussion there.

>> No.12922509

>we

no

>> No.12923280

>>12922348
Too complicated. Lit is more engaged with the pseudointellectual endeavours of postmodernist celebrities where cognitive weakness can be hidden behind obscurantist ramblings and endlessly repeated sarcastic/ ironic ingroup references. It's the outcome of sending 50% of the population to college and makes this forum practically unusable.

>> No.12923286
File: 571 KB, 712x1024, 1544998065267.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12923286

because Husserl is superior

>> No.12923291

>>12923280
heidy is the granddaddy of pomo

>> No.12923303

>>12922348
to hard to read

>> No.12923305

lm personally still struggling with Plato so expect to be able to read and discuss heidegger about 7 years from now

>> No.12923333

>>12923291
In the same sense he is the daddy of Sartre. He rejected rationalism (but not reason), but he didn't embrace rejecting truth as fascist and oppressive. His rejection of rationalism is read as subjectivism, but in fact he is overtly opposed to subjectivism which he blames Descartes for

>> No.12923340

>>12922376

Stop trying to claim the board for your own political sphere you child.

>> No.12924587

>>12923340
I don't claim it to be my own political sphere, I'm just pointing out a fact about the demographics here. You're the one getting triggered that someone doesn't agree with your political opinions by default

>> No.12924624

>>12923280
I agree but half of the "pomo celebrities" are legit philosophers. How do you expect them to make sense of a nonsensical world? Kant had it easy.

>> No.12926010

>>12923333
he hates descartes? cool
i'm studyng filo and about to start with him

>> No.12926020

>>12922348
i have a masters in philosophy and i can barely comprehend most of his work

>> No.12926144

>>12924587
>getting triggered that someone doesn't agree with your political opinions by default
Where did anon say that? Sounds like you're projecting.

>> No.12926191

people who got his message feel no need to.

>> No.12926205

>>12926144
No, he is the one projecting. He has accused me of claiming the board for my own political sphere, when I only pointed out that a significant demographic here crosses over with /pol/.
Why this heavy reaction, calling me a child, if he's indeed not triggered? It comes off as territorial, as if someone here observing demographic trends like an outsider to /pol/ is equal to claiming this board politically. Nowhere in my post did I imply that they have no right to come here, so why this aggressive reaction from him? Fuck off with this manipulative BS.

>> No.12926230

>>12923333
>pomo rejects truth as fascist and oppressive
>Heidegger rejects rationalism
>Heidegger opposed to subjectivism

God, what a brainlet post..

>> No.12926242

>>12922353
>>12923280
>>12923303
>>12923305
>>12926020
He's just to hard for our soft brains.

>>12922348
To be fair, we don't discuss anything. We meme and shitpost.

>> No.12926261
File: 2.31 MB, 1134x820, 1554779677598.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12926261

>>12922348
It's just discount eastern philosophy couched in obscurantism desu

>> No.12926274

>>12926242
I don't know why you guys keep memeing that he's too hard to read. Maybe it's because you're English speakers? If you read him in German, a lot of his weird terminology makes sense intuitively.
Let's take "Sorge" (= "worry" or "concern") for example, there are words like "besorgen" in German ("to take care of", "to acquire") and if you take that word very literally, ignoring those connotations, it sounds like "bestowing with concern". So Dasein relates to itself in the mode of bestowing concern, it can't help but take care of itself and its matters of concern.
Perhaps the English translations make his insightful use of language and play with etymology harder to recognize.

>> No.12926276

because continental philosophy is a shit

>> No.12926310

>>12926274
I'm not learning another language to read him.

And we meme that he's too difficult so we can bestow great importance on him and his work while avoiding any explanation it. We have an idea of Heidegger based on associations and this for us is the content and function of his philosophy. Truth is we are perfectly content to have proxy political and cultural arguments, defending or trashing Heidegger, based on our own approximation of his image. Look at this thread. No one cares about Dasein anon.

>> No.12926313

>>12926276
>t. analytic autist

>> No.12926338

>>12926313

your words hurt

>> No.12926357

>>12922348
bc nobody knows wtf he was talking about

>> No.12926379

>>12926338
it's the painful truth hurting

>> No.12926400

>>12923286
Based husserl poster

>> No.12926402

>>12926400
Want to play Pharoah (1999)?

>> No.12926533

Haven't started him yet
Will begin with the "origin of the work of art" (aesthetics are cool)