[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 233x217, nelson.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12903033 No.12903033 [Reply] [Original]

You fuckers are wasting so much time holy shit.
There are two important realizations:
1. Science can't breach the is-ought gap. There is no objectively true moral system.
2. Memes (moral ideals) are an embedded life form. They serve the interests of the genes.

Then the ultimate question arises: Do you want to exist or not? From the "yes" answer all important moral axioms and ideologies sprout.

>> No.12903046
File: 178 KB, 1366x768, Spread Memes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12903046

Why does the Kraken BTFO the dolphin?

>> No.12903049

>>12903046
Richard Dawkins is such an idiot. He's right on evolution and wrong about everything else. Time to die you delusional old fucker

>> No.12903083

Those are some nice words you got there, might try to explain their relationship to the teuth

>> No.12903166

>>12903083
What point do you want me to elaborate on?

>> No.12903178

>>12903166
The relationship between words/concepts and truth/reality

>> No.12903191

>>12903178
So you don't understand the words I used. Which ones don't you understand?

>> No.12903196
File: 175 KB, 600x600, thinking.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12903196

>>12903033
>want to exist
>behave "amorally"
>still exist

>> No.12903202

>>12903033
>Do you want to exist or not?

not really

>> No.12903220

>>12903196
Sometimes behaving "amorally" (by the definitions of the collective) is only raising ones chances to continue existing.

>> No.12903259
File: 92 KB, 1366x768, mythfagsbtfo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12903259

>>12903049
But how can evolution be real if the Kraken devours the dolphin?

>> No.12903263

It's all absurd, go and play some fotball, shot an arab. Take the Camus pill.

>> No.12903265
File: 200 KB, 1366x768, evolve.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12903265

>>12903259
And if evolution is real, why didn't Dawkins adapt a mutation in the mind away from idiocy?

>> No.12903267

>>12903259
Wtf is this?

>>12903263
What exactly is absurd?

>> No.12903300

>>12903267
The realtionship between man that searches meaning while the transcendental truth is the lack of inherent purposeness in the universe. This emptiness has propelled thinkers to conquer the cosmos with ideology and religion, trying to paint over the reality with spooks in order to escape their subjective existence in order to find a safe resting place in the universe. The spooks are mostly a reaction against the indifference of the universe, ideology to. The ultimate end goal is to embrace the absurd, remove the spooks and get a job. Also fuck women.

>> No.12903316

>>12903300
Wrong. The appropriate response to the realization that everything is a spook is not to abandon them, but to create your own personal spook that serves your self interests. In my case its existence.

>> No.12903325

>>12903316
We are just doing the same thing. Just embrace the absurd and do what you want, that's it. Ethics is just the dying breath of religion and all that self intrest is just you trying to rationalize what you want to do anyways.

>> No.12903333

>>12903325
Indeed. My moral axiom is as true or false as any other axiom. However, the difference between mine and any other moral axiom is that I will survive and you will perish.

>> No.12903335

>>12903267
Better hold on to your seat tight:
https://youtu.be/2tIwYNioDL8

>> No.12903339

>>12903333
Nah dude, I have it pretty chill and eat healthy. You should try to stop being so annoying tho.

>> No.12903348

>>12903339
>Defines existence as individual survival
You're never going to make it dude

>> No.12903942

>>12903033
The only way you can prove 2 is by proving no gods are real. Pretty easy to justify 2 tho