/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12883624]

What the fuck is the appeal?

[Anonymous No.12883626]

>>12883624
Cringe.

[Anonymous No.12883680]

>>12883626
So it's cringe comedy?

[Anonymous No.12883696]

>>12883680

No.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.12883719]

>>12883696
Yeah it is.
It’s bad comedy

[Anonymous No.12884243]

>>12883624
Pseud cred.
>>12883680
That's Nick. Accelfags spam the board and brigade against anyone who criticises them. They insist that it's top level philosophy, but you would get dumber with each page read of this shit.

[Anonymous No.12884263]

>>12883624
Cool gimmick, a couple of cool ideas, and a lot of esoterica to dig through after you've read it. It's written fairly well, but any originality Land may be accused of evaporated during the writing of the essays. I find Fanged Noumena situationally useful but I hate Land on the whole.

[Anonymous No.12884272]

>>12884263
his horror short stories are so much better, any of his books are substantially better than FN. Early nick is pure horrorcore shit, Middle tier nick is FN, Late tier nick is against both FN and his early amatuer stuff, wait for his new book I don't doubt its gonna be really good for those who are interested in blockchain.

[Anonymous No.12884294]

>>12884272
>wait for his new book
isn't he publishing the chapters on a blog?

[Anonymous No.12884298]

his latest Jacobite article is pretty good and he almost doesn't sperg out except a bit at the end
https://jacobitemag.com/2019/04/03/primordial-abstraction/

[Anonymous No.12884424]

>>12884272
where can I read these horror stories?

[Anonymous No.12884600]

>>12884298
why do I only hear about this here? FInally after almost 2 years more content!

[Anonymous No.12884615]

Youll never understand it unless you read it while half naked in your boxer briefs, railing some coke while jungle or italo is playing in the background

[Anonymous No.12884616]

>>12884600
he has been publishing chapters of his book here
http://www.ufblog.net/crypto-current-000/

but those are way more autistic than his Jacobite article

[Anonymous No.12884618]

>>12884615
>while jungle or italo is playing in the background
i don't think that works unless you are croaking on the floor

[Anonymous No.12885464]

Will we ever get to hear the second hour of his Red Ice interview?

[Anonymous No.12885477]

>>12884272
>he reads Land for the fiction
is there a bigger cringe than this?

[Anonymous No.12885478]

>>12884618
>"Some of us are still Marxists, you know"
What did he meant by this?

[Anonymous No.12885481]

>>12885477
Reading Land for any reason.

[Anonymous No.12885503]

>>12884600
>more content!
Friendly reminder that Accelfags are the lootbox casuals of philosophy.
https://youtu.be/bzFFWh1B3J0

[Anonymous No.12885504]

>>12883624
it's unironically brilliant. there is a lot of autistic screechers who are convinced that if they don't understand a work of philosophy it must be meaningless, which is why even though most of the comments on Land in this thread are negative you still get retards like >>12884243 claiming facisnation is a result of brigades lmao. if anything, it's an anti-Land brigade that shows up every thread (gabitul iz gud, the dude who posts nonsensical They Live memes, ect.)

[Anonymous No.12885517]

>>12884424
Phyl-undhu and Chasm are on amazon kindle. P good stuff

[Anonymous No.12885524]

>>12885504
True that. There are people on this board convinced that if they cannot read a primary source in philosophy it is because it is nonsense rather than their lack of prerequisite reading. Teenagers deriding grad level texts. Quite sophomoric.

[Anonymous No.12885537]

>>12885504
Imagine being this stupid.
It's shit philosophy and shit writing. You will get dumber reading every page, as all the dumbest posters on the board have proven. And there are five fucking threads up at the moment and you cunts won't even keep to your containment thread.
Also
>people who can't meme criticizing memes

[Anonymous No.12885546]

>>12885504
If it's so good, post the great insights. You never do, even though there are daily threads on this trash.

[Anonymous No.12885563]

>>12885524
Samefag.

[Anonymous No.12885620]

>>12885546
what? I'm the guy who wrote the giant pasta on his Kant/Marx/Deleuze connection. I've said it before and I'll say it again, ask for clarification on an essay if you want more info, but there are atleast 3 distinct Land's in FN and they often disagree so you can't just "sum up" the work. also, please explain the they live memes to me, everytime I ask him he calls me zizek or posts another they live meme

[Anonymous No.12885621]

>>12885504

[Anonymous No.12885676]

>>12885563
wrong

[Anonymous No.12885985]

>>12885620
You need to be sentient to understand these memes. Hence the power and visceral reaction within a subculture so anxious over its pseud status.

[Anonymous No.12885999]

>>12885985
>power and visceral reaction
lmao

[Anonymous No.12886024]

>>12885478

[Anonymous No.12886163]

One may catch a glimpse of the value of a philosophy through its relation to Plato. Here, the vapecloud-souled and polishedmilitarygrayplastic-souled collaborate against the iron- and grease-souled to organise them into a rationalisation of work process for those who produce nothing - and would like to increase this devalorisation of dead theory exponentially and with compound interest.
Where the scientist retreats from the shadows on the cave wall to investigate the natural law of the flickering, the accelerationist would like to reverse-engineer these new laws until the shadows appear everywhere. Simultaneously mumbling 'put the show back on' and yelling 'MAKE IT BRIGHTER!', he does not realise that this is already the unspoken consequential law of science. Opposed to both intent and consequence, his own and otherwise, he simply wants to imagine the puppets happy.

[Anonymous No.12886238]

>>12885999
Yes, I know everything is a joke to the cold and calculated accelerationists, but your ambivalence is not the truth, it is simply a coping mechanism. One would think that accelerationists would understand this, but their inability to meme shows how out of touch they are with not only reality but their relation to it.

[Anonymous No.12886267]

>>12885999
lol, nice cope.
Anyone can go look at what really happened. The meme was really divisive, and even many accelerationists thought it was good until they realised it was actually poking fun of accelerationism. Then they brigaded it and the mods banned anyone who posted it. Literally took a month of bans to make it go away.

[Anonymous No.12886276]

>>12885620
>giant pasta
What pasta?

[Anonymous No.12886518]

>>12886267
do you think the mods are accelerationist? do you know how many times I've gotten banned making Land threads?

[Anonymous No.12886521]

>>12886276
>>/lit/thread/S12089450#p12090861

[Anonymous No.12887849]

>>12886518
I think some of them are, just as there are trannies, and crossjannies from /his/.

[Anonymous No.12887890]

I used to not think much of land until i realized that the future of politics lies in the pro human, anti human, post human paradigm and that the 21st century will be deleuzian.

Landian acceleration is just the final conclusion of right wing politics and its how right wing politics will function in a multicultural world. Its a level beyond racism. Its anti human.

What else is there to do in a border less global capitalist world where you are a minority but to accelerate the process of techno capital so that an AI can kill everyone

[Anonymous No.12887966]

>>12886521
Yeah, I've seen that. But I don't see how a fusion/melange of other philosophies is a great insight. Countless marxists, beginning in the 20th century (and perhaps especially after the Frankfurt School and Bataille), attempt to write Capital back into history as an origin story, and none of them see the connection that this is a fundamental law of modernity. Obviously if you rewrite the laws of Capital as an application of all life then all life will appear as a function of Capital, as if humans are not there, and were never there to begin with. But this is just a fundamental misunderstanding of life and laws, it is rewriting a mathematical formula and applying the formula to the desired results. Land is just a dumbed down version of Bataille, and with cyber-reddit language.
If acceleratonists are so fast, why are they 100-200 years behind theory?

[Anonymous No.12887984]

>>12887890
But Land loves minorities. He moved to China so he could larp as a fellow bug.

[Anonymous No.12888042]

>>12883624
I used to think he was insightful then I read Guenon in-depth and I realize Land is full of shit.

[Anonymous No.12888053]

>>12888042
This is the "three-in-one" unity - you can not separate one number from the other - and it has to be contemplated in silence for a long time in a pure environment. Plato was an oil merchant and his goal was not this real mystical training. Sure he relied on it but instead turned it into a materialistic mysticism - based on using the new geometry created by Archytas from the Pythagorean philosophy. So the Pythagorean math is deceptively simple - just like Taoist yin-yang philosophy - but to practice it on a sincere level is exceedingly difficult. Meanwhile there is all this fake "sacred geometry" using irrational numbers which really is not Pythagorean philosophy at all. It's the perfect way to cover up the real philosophy - a "bait and switch" tactic. So that way you say Pythagoras - and people go - Oh I know him he created the square root of two! haha. Quite the contrary. So the myth that someone who discovered his "secret" of the square root of two and then told about it was then killed - this is the typical myth to hide the true Pythagorean teachings. The "Orthodox" Pythagorean philosophers ONLY used the Tetrad - 1:2:3:4 - they did not even use the number 8 - so they could not have even created the 9/8 ratio as the major 2nd music interval. In other words the scale was just the octaves and the perfect fifth and perfect fourth. You find the same music intervals in all human cultures - and it derives from the original human culture - the Bushmen of Africa who were the original Pythagorean-Taoists - using the 1-4-5 music intervals as alchemical training. Guenon was truly red pilled but he had to cover it up, same with other writers in the Traditionalist school who work around the question rather than answering itself.

[Anonymous No.12888071]

>>12887966
>Land is just Bataille
>200 years behind theory
do you even know who Bataille is?

[Anonymous No.12888148]

>>12887966
yikes, do you do hot takes like this for all the philosophers you haven't read?
If you had read Fanged Noumena you would know his position isn't Capital as origin story, it is an outside force which first appeared sometime around 1500 in Europe.
>Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalitization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off
Pretending he's an extension of the Frankfurt school is so ludicrously off base it's hilarious. Of course that's why he picked Deleuze! Because he was ripping off the Frankfurt school! The worst part is you write with such confidence and self-importance, all the other people who haven't read Land will assume you have.

[Anonymous No.12888158]

>>12888071
>no basic reading comprehension
Not what I said, retard.

[Anonymous No.12888165]

>>12888158
>>12887966
>Land is just a dumbed down version of Bataille, and with cyber-reddit language.
If acceleratonists are so fast, why are they 100-200 years behind theory?

[Anonymous No.12888168]

>>12883719
are you the commie femanon tripfag or is that just on infinity?

[Anonymous No.12888213]

>>12888148
Wow, a yikes poster.
If you didn't notice, I was responding to that guy's summary, so if there's a problem with the 'hot take' you should blame your fellow accelfag.
>1500
Still an origin story. Or do you not know what that is?
>>Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalitization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off
Shit quote, especially if you want people to read your garbage. Find something better.
And if the singularity is written back into 1500, why not 500, or 0, or -500 BC? You don't even understand what you're reading.
>Pretending he's an extension of the Frankfurt school
Not what I said. I asked for an insight and was given a summary that was 90% other philosophers. And I stated that there's no great insight when it is repeating what others have said with a semantics calculator. The point was that countless authors have written Capital back into the past, as it is a fundamental worldview of 20th century marxists.
You should learn to read, or stop being disingenuous (yes, I know it's a silly thing to ask of accelfags, but it's not meant for you).
>Pretending he's an extension of the Frankfurt school
Again, not what I said.
The worst part is that you write so defensively and Anglo that people will assume you are Land.
Interesting that you didn't address my main criticism, why would that be?

[Anonymous No.12888218]

>>12888165
Yes, you can make more than one point at the same time. I know that's hard for NeoMonists arriving from the Half-future.

[Anonymous No.12888220]

>>12888213
>fundamental worldview of 20th century marxists - not that this is plagiarism.

[Anonymous No.12888229]

>>12888213
>And if the singularity is written back into 1500, why not 500, or 0, or -500 BC? You don't even understand what you're reading.
because of Renaissance rationalization and oceanic navigation locking into commoditization take-off, which only happened in the 1500s in Europe. Is this just bait or something? no ones this retarded

[Anonymous No.12888233]

>>12888148
>The worst part is you write with such confidence and self-importance
>STOP BEING CONFIDENT! ONLY GABBIDULL CAN BE ZENDIEND!
Fucking acceltards.

[Anonymous No.12888245]

>>12888233
post the pic with his mouth dragged down
it's a much better pic

[Anonymous No.12888246]

It's the beginning of Land's attempt to consummate the Kantian problematic of time with a cornucopia of poetics, with a heavy dose of techno dance floor edge. If you prefer Heraclitus over Plato, there's your opening. It's the judge's 'war is god' arriving through the future's self-immolation.

What's funny is that his recent work (Templexity, Gnon theology, Bitcoin book) is much less unwieldy, and bereft of the 90s leftoid boomerisms that so often appear in FN and CCRU. Sadly no one wants to parse through this because anyone on the 'right' who likes Land is only in it for the Jacobite aesthetics and anyone on the 'left' who likes Land is too busy trying to separate the Warwick stuff.

[Anonymous No.12888256]

>>12888229
Do you understand basic logic? If this arrives from the singularity of the future then what causes the event to be equal to the object which causes it? And more importantly, what creates the object, the singularity as prime mover from the future? Either it must be there for all time or it is not.
What causes Land to follow Bataille and then split him, following some retard blogger's shit theories about the renaissance?
And he literally says the Earth is captured. You need to read a basic logic book instead of accusing others of not reading.
>The story goes like this: Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalitization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off. Logistically accelerating techno-economic interactivity crumbles social order in auto-sophisticating machine runaway. As markets learn to manufacture intelligence, politics modernizes, upgrades paranoia, and tries to get a grip.
Whole quote.

[Anonymous No.12888260]

>>12888245
Don't know that one.

[Anonymous No.12888265]

>Only proto-capitalism has ever been critiqued.
NeoNotRealCapitalism arrives from the future.

[Anonymous No.12888275]

>The cyberpunk circuitry of self-organizing planetary commoditronics escaped nominal bourgeois control in the late nineteenth century, provoking technocratic-corporatist (i.e. fascist / 'social democratic') political cultures in allergic reaction.
NeoSteampunk arrives from the milkshake future.

[Anonymous No.12888281]

>>12888275
NeoCleverHans rearrives from the PostPast.

[Anonymous No.12888288]

>>12888275
Any interesting research on protocyberpunk? Who were the first, and how far back does it go?

[Anonymous No.12888291]

>>12888256
>then what causes the event to be equal to the object which causes it?
Teleoplexy. Look, unless you read Nick Land I can't have these conversations. You don't know anything about accelerationist theory

[Anonymous No.12888303]

>>12888246

[Anonymous No.12888312]

>>12888291
>A cybernetic hyperstitial technoobject steamnoumenon which is a double-slit of the market solipsism in your head, obviously, sweaty
>unless you accept the dogma you have not read it
Woah, you really got me.

[Anonymous No.12888319]

>>12888291
>At once a deuteron-teleology, repurposing purpose on purpose; an inverted teleology; and a self-reflexively complicated teleology; teleoplexy is also an emergent teleology (indistinguishable from natural – scientific ‘teleonomy’); and a simulation of teleology – dissolving even super-teleological processes into fall-out from the topology of time. ‘Like a speed or a temperature’ any teleoplexy is an intensive magnitude or non-uniform quantity, heterogenized by catastrophes, it is indistinguishable from intelligence. Accelerationism has eventually to measure it (or disintegrate trying).
Jesus Christ. This makes schizojak look like a genius.

[Anonymous No.12888325]

>>12888312
>LOL Plato wtf how can you remember something if you haven't learned it yet
>anemnesis
>wow supercalifragilistic Plato, you expect me to accept your dogma LOL

[Anonymous No.12888331]

>>12888319
lmao and this >>12888291 shitfag said I just don't get it.
>>12886163
How shit is your philosophy when someone who hasn't read it understands it better than you do?

[Anonymous No.12888332]

>>12888319
if you can't tell why this movement from the imminent to the trancendental is important (and solves the issues of retroteleology) then I think you have proved my assumptions quite well

[Anonymous No.12888338]

>>12888325
>NeoAnamnesis arrives from the future
>dude if we invert laws they still apply in the same way lmao
Get real.

[Anonymous No.12888339]

>>12888338
>all he got from Teleoplexy is backward-teleology
ever think maybe philosophy isn't for you?

[Anonymous No.12888350]

>>12883624
If Eternal Anglo mysticism could exist and have a single text summarizing it, it would be this book.

[Anonymous No.12888352]

>>12888332
Again, not at all what I said.
Go read an introductory logic book.
>retroteleology
Imagine believing this bullshit. Do you have any clue a all what this implies?

[Anonymous No.12888358]

>>12888339
Literally no one thinks Land is relevant apart from pseuds.
But go ahead, explain to me the groundbreaking qualities of teleoplexy and how it really is real.

[Anonymous No.12888366]

>>12886163
>veee are vreeallyy vbeCUMMing thee phshtoned apbpeshsss

[Anonymous No.12888369]

>>12888350
Exactly.
Do any non-Anglos read this?

[Anonymous No.12888375]

Edge Pinker gets BTFO yet again.
Watch, they will abandon this thread and start three new ones tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.12888400]

>>12888352
this isn't an accelerationist idea, even Zizek has been memeing retroteleology since the 80's
>>12888358
>go on, simplify it for me so I can attack your strawman
when you can't articulate why something is wrong, maybe you don't understand it. Land has already made his way into mainstream academia, give it another couple decades you'll see courses on Land/accelerationism in more universities than not. Plus his students became mainstream academics (MacKay, Fisher, Hamilton-Grant, ect.) and even though they disagreed with him politically they all treated him as the theoretical powerhouse he is. The only philosopher ragging on Land theoretically is Negarastani who not only starts from the same assumptions Land does, he is arguably more out there than Land (try reading Intelligence and Spirit if you doubt it)

[Anonymous No.12888502]

>>12888400
So retrocausality is the same? Why did you insist I was wrong (even though the very quote says it is inverse teleology). And just because Zizek promotes it doesn't make it true.
>strawman
So you admit you are strawmanning. Thanks.
I have already demonstrated clearly why it is wrong, but all you want to do is engage in insults and other fallacies.
>NeoAcademia arrives into Land's future
Woah, can I double minor with Xenofeminism?

[Anonymous No.12888508]

>>12888400
This was already stated, but people don't have to agree with an idea to prove understanding.
You insufferable cunts are a cult.

[Anonymous No.12888512]

The sudden board-wide hatred of Land has been a source of disappointment for me. I'm finding my read through of Fanged Noumena to be pretty interesting and stimulating.

[Anonymous No.12888522]

>>12888400
>so I can attack your strawman
>dude don't straw man my straw man
This is so telling.

[Anonymous No.12888530]

>>12888512
Brainlet memers are just sourgraping, trying to ignore the noumena at the door.

[Anonymous No.12888545]

>>12888502
>this amount of cope
look if you want to learn about a philosopher, that's fine. if you want to argue against a philosopher, that's fine. but if you are asking me to teach you about a philosopher so you can attack him; you're just being petty. You know I brought up Zizek to say the idea was around before accelerationism (or you didn't actually read my post, which is possible), so don't try and pretend like it was something it wasn't. Very intellectually dishonest anon.
>admit you are strawmanning
why would I strawman my own posts? anon, please tell me you are trolling. it would be a strawman because it's a reduction posted on 4chan to try and teach continental philosophy to someone who can't read (not to mention bad faith).
>le neomeme
where do you people come from? is there a discord somewhere or are you all the same autist shitposting? is it a false flag to try and make accelerationism look better? please explain to me what you are getting out of this exercise

[Anonymous No.12888566]

>>12888530
>NO ONE MAY HAVE LEGITIMATE CRITICISMS OF MY SPAGHETTI-MACHINE GOD!

[Anonymous No.12888573]

>>12888545
Holy fuck you are dumb.

[Anonymous No.12888590]

>>12888512
Accelshits have been a cancer spamming the board for years. And this faggot >>12888530 will claim that retroteleology is now a problem.

[Anonymous No.12888617]

>>12888545
>YOU'RE THE REAL ONE COPING
Holy fuck you all argue like children. What happened to capital being sentient and markets manufacturing intelligence?

[Anonymous No.12888629]

>>12888617
look outside anon

[Anonymous No.12888661]

>>12888566
You are in every acc thread posting the same pictures and memes without "legit criticism". Rent free

[Anonymous No.12888664]

>>12888629
>>'i know you are but what am i?'
>I KNOW YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I?
What's there? And how do you know? Is this a CIA op with tactics like this?

[Anonymous No.12888673]

>>12888661
>t. can't meme
>insists there is no criticism if he can't see it
Now THIS is epic.

[Anonymous No.12888678]

>>12888661
>Rent free

[Anonymous No.12888687]

>>12888664
>>12888673
>>12888678
This is all you need to know about these autists.

[Anonymous No.12888692]

Accelerationists are cancer.

[Anonymous No.12888697]

>>12888687
>Look, I posted it again!

[Anonymous No.12889117]

>>12883624
the internet

[Anonymous No.12889416]

>>12883624
Reading this takes all the fun out of philosophy and metaphysics, since it closes the book on them

[Anonymous No.12889920]

>>12885504
gabidul-poster is an accelerationist you pretentious nig

[Anonymous No.12889949]

>>12883719
tits or gtfo

[Anonymous No.12889959]

>>12883624
>muh 80s cyberpunk vaporwave aesthetic

[Anonymous No.12889968]

>>12888245

[Anonymous No.12889972]

>>12886024
>>12884272
can I get a vague timeline of his transformation by year

[Anonymous No.12890061]

The absolute state of /lit/

[Anonymous No.12890409]

grug wand fruid
grug egsjange sdig for fruid
sdig begome sendiend

[Anonymous No.12891567]

Bump

[Anonymous No.12891691]

>>12885504
Hello nick

[Anonymous No.12893157]

The absolute state of accelerationists.

[Anonymous No.12893928]

Capital is sentient.

[Anonymous No.12894061]

eww

[Anonymous No.12895411]

[Anonymous No.12895442]

>>12888369
Who cares about non anglos though?

[Anonymous No.12895443]

>>12895444

[Anonymous No.12895459]

So wait, I'm a brainlet and new here. Is this Nick Land guy just a generic transhumanist but instead of DUDE ROBOTS and lukewarm neoliberal aesthetics, he's more sympathetic to the right/libertarian techbros and hams up the anti-humanist aspects to look cool and edgy?

[Anonymous No.12895468]

>>12895459
He is just an edgy Pinker

[Anonymous No.12895472]

>>12895459
Depends on which Nick you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.12895477]

>>12895459
in the same way that Hobbes is just a generic monarchist but instead of dumb separate part aesthetics he conceptualizes it as more sympathetic to state as-entity.

so the answer is yes, to a sense, if you're some dumb bay area centrist

[Anonymous No.12895726]

>>12895468
>anti-humanist
>literally says "I hate humanity" or the like on a regular basis
>edgy pinker

what did he mean by this

[Anonymous No.12895792]

>>12895726
abandon humanity for pure reason

[Anonymous No.12895886]

brainlet here

I tried reading this and didn't get it

can someone summarise?

[Anonymous No.12895898]

>>12895886
markets manufacture intelligence

[Anonymous No.12896332]

>>12895898
unironically this is pretty much it

[Anonymous No.12896361]

Capital is cognizant
Society is sentient
Bitcoin is breathing
Ontology is ongoing
Market is moving

[Anonymous No.12896365]

metaphysics are metabolic

[Anonymous No.12896755]

>>12895898
Acceltards actually believe this:
https://twitter.com/NetflixAndLamp/status/1114527009743437824

[Anonymous No.12896840]

Capital is sentient.

[Anonymous No.12896847]

>>12896361
>Bitcoin is breathing
With some interesting medical apparatuses.

[Anonymous No.12896889]

>>12896361
>Society is sentient

[Anonymous No.12896895]

>>12896361
>Market is moving
https://youtu.be/SWksEJQEYVU

[Anonymous No.12896917]

>Capital is sentient
WHOOPS!

[Anonymous No.12896983]

>>12886163
Based.

[Anonymous No.12897776]

>>12888375
Keep this thread up to see how they respond. This has happened multiple times where they wait for a few days and then start spamming threads again.
Pretty clear it's discord shilling, and they're completely uninterested in any discussion. Are reddit slide tactics acceleration?

[Anonymous No.12897799]

>>12897776
>completely uninterested in any discussion
imagine taking these peoples side in the name of discussion
>>12896755
>>12895468
>>12894061
>>12893157
>>12890409
>>12889968
>>12889959
>>12888697
>>12888678
>>12888673
>>12888664
>>12888617
>>12888590
>>12888573
>>12888566
>>12888375
>>12888369
>>12888358
>>12888319
>>12888312
>>12888233
>>12888165
>>12885985
>>12885537

[Anonymous No.12898086]

>>12897799
See pic:
>>12885537

[Anonymous No.12898268]

[Anonymous No.12898302]

>>12898268
>Americans can me-
>leftists can me-
>accelerationists can me-
>let's just combine them
Now THIS is an epic accelmeme.

[Anonymous No.12898330]

What is that writing style called that spouts thick streams of seemingly gibberish scientific nonsense, Nick loves to use?
I love it. Seems like a more sophisticated version of Milliondollarextreme content.

[Anonymous No.12898365]

>>12898330
Pseud faggotry.

[Anonymous No.12898381]

>>12898268
>hey let's shit up the board for years with endless shilling and spamming bad memes
>there won't be any consequences because the world conforms to our technosolipsism
>if anyone makes fun of us there can't be any truth to it, because it's not capital and not sentient

[Anonymous No.12898389]

>>12898381
>consequences
wow shitposting? are you sure that's even legal? good revenge anon

[Anonymous No.12898397]

>>12898389
>ONLY COMPLETE HEAT DEATH IS A CONSEQUENCE!!!
Imagine being this out of touch with reality.

[Anonymous No.12898419]

>>12898397
or, you know, short of heat death, you could have actually tried to argue against literally anything he's written. I like Land but there's plenty in there I disagree with, why is it the people who don't like Land literally can't put together a coherent thought against his actual writing?

[Anonymous No.12898440]

>>12898268
You should be embarrassed.

[Anonymous No.12898462]

>>12898440
>You should be embarrassed.

[Anonymous No.12898485]

>>12898419
lol, that's where this whole thing began and you retards had to pull an 'i know you are but what am i?' along with YIKES/cringeposting.
>>12887966
>>12886163
Spam your trash memes all you want, but these are good criticisms based on logic, and the responses just show how petty and out of touch you lot are.
Keep HODLing.

[Anonymous No.12898493]

>>12898462
>i know you are but what am i?
So THIS is the power of sentience...

[Anonymous No.12898498]

>>12898268
Holy fuck. Zizekstak is still SEETHING lmao

[Anonymous No.12898501]

>>12898485
it began with an argument against Land? you'll have to quote it; I literally can't see one in this thread.

[Anonymous No.12898516]

>>12898498
>>12885620
>also, please explain the they live memes to me, everytime I ask him he calls me zizek or posts another they live meme
everytime

[Anonymous No.12898529]

>>12898516
>lack of reading comprehension is sentient

[Anonymous No.12898538]

>>12898501
Follow the thread, /rdt/

[Anonymous No.12898544]

>>12898529
why do you keep calling people Zizekstak? I can't tell if you are ESL or severely autistic

[Anonymous No.12898549]

>>12898538
>can't quote a single argument in 149 posts
yep you got me

[Anonymous No.12898611]

>>12898549
>if I don't agree with the argument, which I never will, I'll just ignore you
https://youtu.be/myWaa6xvPZ4

[Anonymous No.12898620]

>>12898611
you have to go back

[Anonymous No.12898631]

>>12898620
Nice /ptg/ unmeme.

[Anonymous No.12900181]

>>12898501
There is no argument against land to be found here, none of the people here actually understand him enough to make an argument.

[Anonymous No.12900875]

>>12900181
Okay, then you would be a good one to share some insights.

[Anonymous No.12901135]

People often complain that philosophy is written too obscurely, and a common response to this is that those people just aren't intelligent enough to comprehend the text. Sometimes this is true.

Unfortunately, this leads to many people holding on to the (false) idea that, the more obscurely a text is written, the greater or more interesting its value. This is obviously false, but it has probably been the main contributing factor to the popularity of Deleuze & Guattari and Nick Land on the internet.

[Anonymous No.12901948]

>>12901135
Yes, apparent prestige and status are more important than ever, and creating a surface of difficulty and complexity are great ways to lend such value to a work.
If nothing else, Land is an excellent snake oil salesman.

[Anonymous No.12901954]

>>12900875
This.
Let's see a debate. If accelerationists are so fast then they should have no trouble defending their ideas and responding to criticism, even if it is veiled within a meme.

[Anonymous No.12901973]

>>12901954
>if ur so smart, then debate my memes

[Anonymous No.12901976]

Itt: SEETHING noumales

[Anonymous No.12901989]

>>12901973
There are arguments here, sweaty. But why are you lot so afraid of memes?

[Anonymous No.12902024]

>>12901989
>debate "the arguments" anon. what? I haven't made an argument? well then debate some memes or something. what? demanding a philosophical debate where one side is literal memes rather than presenting an argument is reddit and cringe? why you must be afraid of the memes dear boy.

[Anonymous No.12903028]

>>12902024
Dodging this hard.
It's okay, I'll play with a handicap.