[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 16 KB, 220x285, 220px-PhilipDick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875506 No.12875506 [Reply] [Original]

Who's the "shakespeare" of sci fi?

>> No.12875517

>>12875506
H G Wells

>> No.12875522

>>12875506

I don't know but it isn't Dick. Dick is the Dante of sf.

>> No.12875546

>>12875506
Ridley Scott desudesudesu

>> No.12875587

Pynchon

>> No.12875603

>>12875517
this is tempting. would still have to go with jules verne.

>> No.12875622

>>12875506
Gene Wolfe

>> No.12875641

>>12875622
aka the walrus

>> No.12875789

>>12875622

No, Gene Wolfe is the Melville of sf.

>> No.12876234

>>12875506
Asimov, Clarke, or Heinlein. Take your pick bitch.

>> No.12876237

>>12875506
Heinlein

>> No.12876583

Jack Vance

>> No.12876589

>>12875506
Shelley? Shakespeare with tits?

>> No.12876601

>>12875506
>implying genre-fiction could ever be comparable to Shakespeare

>> No.12876623

>>12876601
shakespeare is overrated anyways

>> No.12876626

>>12875506
Poe.

>> No.12876746

>>12875641
i agree, he is walrusesque

>> No.12876751

>>12876623
i think that shakespeare agrees with you and feels bad about it everyday

>> No.12876992

>>12876623
brainlet contrarian take

>> No.12876998

>>12875506
Asimov is the only right answer.

>> No.12877010

>>12876623
I really doubt youre qualified to comment on shakespeare at all

>> No.12877574

George Lucas or Gene Roddenberry

>> No.12877591

Alfred Bester.

>> No.12877594

>>12876998
>>12876234
>Asimov
thoughts on Foundation? Really tempted to buy it

>> No.12877659

>>12877594
It's quite possibly his magnum opus, and you'd be doing yourself a real favor by acquiring it.

>> No.12877663

Michael Crichton

>> No.12877723

Stanislav Lem and everybody who doesnt agree has propably yet to read his work. Asimov comes close tho.

>> No.12879394

>>12877594
Not terrible, but one of the most overrated things I've ever read.
>>12877591
How is Bester? Been looking for something of his at bookstores lately.

>> No.12879424

>>12877594
Shallow and half-flat characters that get dumped for an entire new cast every hundred pages. The overarching plot is alright, but it never really grabbed my attention, especially since the whole guiding idea behind it is that everything i predetermined, and thus any tension is null and void by default.

>> No.12879447

>>12877594
Only the fist trilogy is good, and the fist book is the best.
But Asimov is a hack if you have read actually good books, if not read him now because at some point he becomes unreadable.

>> No.12879452

>>12876998
His prose and characters are terrible, so no. He does not have a poetic bone in him.

>> No.12879526

>>12877723
This right fucking here. Except the close second are the Strugatski bros.

>> No.12879534

>>12875506
Mary Shelley

>> No.12879621
File: 20 KB, 220x328, rur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12879621

>>12875506
the Čapek brothers?