[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 462 KB, 988x1190, 1553222514612.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875104 No.12875104 [Reply] [Original]

I think I may have unironically made the best piece of literature and maybe storytelling in general from the past 100 years. Im not asking you to believe me, Im just asking what subtle /lit/ only meme should I slip in. Im thinking about a half obscured reference to raimiposting from one character but thats /tv/

And dont be fooled. Its not some epic post ironic meme book. It simply has slight tones of black comedy from X characters

>> No.12875115

>>12875104
Post an excerpt

>> No.12875137
File: 207 KB, 765x986, 1537281641236.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875137

>>12875115
No. The truth is, once its out, there actually is an ancient excerpt from an ancient test chapter deep in the /lit/ archives but its not something that actually exists in the final book. Its easy to find once you know one of the main pieces of terminology that pops up over an over again

heres an excerpt from the first and only erotica ive written so far. It doesnt represent the quality of my "actual" book, not even close, but im still comfortable and confident in saying that its objectively better than anything in the /lit/ critique threads and written by professional standards

>> No.12875148

But pee comes from there

>> No.12875155

are you the metaphysics 2019 guy?

>> No.12875156

>>12875137
boring larp *yawn*

>> No.12875163
File: 2.84 MB, 518x382, 1539973547400.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875163

>>12875155
No

>>12875156
Whats the larp part? I heard erotica makes money, I wrote one and put it up on amazon/ kindle as a test. Even such a niche topic with barely any marketing has sold a bit but ive been too busy to double down on erotica and I want to finish the real book first (almost done now)

>> No.12875172

You're the guy who wrote about being a human floor, right? That really was peak /lit/

>> No.12875177

>>12875137
>"God...this must be what pussy feels like."
lost

>> No.12875180
File: 307 KB, 720x304, 1536751819974.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875180

>>12875172
No

>> No.12875198

>>12875163
you’re just boring, your writing isn’t good and this is obviously bait, but it’s not even funny or exciting bait, it’s just the same old ‘yada yada yada I’m the new DFW haha!’

get a life

>> No.12875207

>>12875172
Paste?

>> No.12875219
File: 417 KB, 1467x1821, 1543187498655.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875219

>>12875198
>you’re just boring, your writing isn’t good and this is obviously bait

all wrong and this is why you arent making money by writing, youre actually stupid and arrogant enough to be desperately needy for a flex rather than being audience aware, adaptable and being able to write crystal clear prose that gets the job done instead of fucking trying to make gay porn for 40 year old women look like nabokov

> it’s just the same old ‘yada yada yada I’m the new DFW haha!’
thanks for confirming just what I said, you actually think im here to boast about how epic I am as a stylists. But yes, I definitely am better at that too than you, see you when the book is out. I almost hope that the publishers around here would be iffy enough on its most controversial aspects that id get a chance to self publish it online and promote it here all day long

>> No.12875238
File: 264 KB, 840x840, F68C1A5D-88D4-429F-93C0-41A5BF29A9EB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875238

>>12875137
You used wet and warm together like 3 times in 1 page
Pretty bad honestly, and Im not even talking about the quality of the text but rather about your mentality. In erotic fiction what really gets the blood pumping down is the build-up, not an isolated blowjob. Sex scenes are easy as fuck to write, they are almost mathematic, is the scenario, the development to that moment when A grabs B's dick that tells you if its good erotica or not so when you made the choice of presenting this as proof of your writing skills you showed us how very little you actually understand about the very genre you are writing about, and I can safely assume by the answers youve been giving that this lack of understanding of the genre you are writing about permeates all over your work.
TL;DR: Stop being a fag, God hates it.

>> No.12875254
File: 19 KB, 220x298, Vladimir_Nabokov_1960s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875254

Make a extremely self-aware reference to nab posting. You know that meme where someone posts a few senteced criticism to some author in a way that Nabokov is famous for? Write within your book a Nabokovian criticism to your own book. I'm sure some of the faggots on this board will start calling you a postmodernist God.

>> No.12875287
File: 23 KB, 465x550, 1550310934556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875287

>>12875238
>In erotic fiction what really gets the blood pumping down is the build-up, not an isolated blowjob.

woah...maybe you should buy the erotica then since the sex scene is at the end of chapter 2 and unlike the shitty porn you find online its actually structured and has a proper sense of character, regardless of being trashy porn designed to titillate. The screencap exists to show a random piece of the writing to show that I can objectively write functional, professional prose that isnt epic purple "style" wank. Its actually embarrassing that you lack self awareness to this degree and wrote up that complete dogshit post critiquing things that are not in the post you replied to and you couldnt possibly know about outside of retarded assumptions. Did you fucking think that one half page was the full erotica? Are you fucking retarded?

>presenting this as proof of your writing skills
brainlet, plebfiltered, never going to make it and retarded in general. You try to "write", I write.
>>12875254
The book isnt self aware. It has one character who makes references (mostly in prose) to things from our real life. The book is only postmodern in the objective sense that we literally are living in the postmodern time. Its also structured much more like a play/ screenplay so every scene is dead important and crystal focused, there isnt really any space to slip in some random completely unrelated thing involving books out of nowhere. An actual meme (particularly a term) thats hard to spot for anyone who isnt from /lit/ is easier to slide in

>> No.12875292

>>12875137
Damn, this is art. /crit/ters BTFO.

>> No.12875304

>>12875287
I can't tell if you're actually delusional or keeping up the LARP very sincerely and well. It makes it funnier, so good job OP.

>> No.12875308

What's the book gonna be about?

>> No.12875318

Why are there so many pics of this hideous mongrel

>> No.12875326

>>12875287
You didnt respond to my argument tho.
If you were such a good writer you would have known the basics of what you were writing yet you didnt because, again, you chose to show a sex scene which was bland as fuck.
Also, what kind of hack writer writes erotica on amazon for quick bucks? That alone tells me you are not an artist in any sense and couldnt produce anything with artistic merit if your life depended on it. You sound like someone who is subscribed to "How To Succeed" Yt channels.
Post an excerpt from your grand masterpiece and prove me wrong faggot.

>> No.12875335

>>12875104
insert a subtle nod to the popular /tv/ meme,
"You're a big guy."
"... for you."
that's the only way we'll know this masterpiece was crafted by the ultrachad that is OP

>> No.12875350
File: 39 KB, 403x750, 1534343860278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875350

>>12875304
Not an argument. Just because youre on a board full of retarded larping brainlets who all fantasize about being nabokov because ONLY DA STYLE MATTERS!!11 doesnt mean that youre actually smart or remotely correct. The fact that you actually think that the porn I posted was designed to flex about my ""writing skills"" and not objectively demonstrate professional ability is telling enough. You dont know what being pro means, literally or in terms of how it looks in the product, you dont know what constitutes professional writing and youll never make anything like it because you know nothing about the mechanics. All you know is a vague idea of what "style" could be and its exactly why the crit threads on this board are full of embarrassing snippets of absolute nothingness dressed up with garbage language to seem more than they are

>>12875308
school shooters in a future where a near apocalyptic jihad from an alien race happened

>>12875326
>If you were such a good writer you would have known the basics of what you were writing
not an argument, youre literally posting epic fallacies here and expect me to dance along them, how fucking stupid are you?

>again, you chose to show a sex scene which was bland as fuck.
I couldnt care less about your epic review here, I selected a random page a long time ago and it has been the only one reposted here whenever the occasion springs up since the full book is elsewhere for sale

>Also, what kind of hack writer writes erotica on amazon for quick bucks?
thanks for confirming youre either 14 or very retarded, certainly not a writer for sure

>That alone tells me you are not an artist in any sense
because youre a delusional child who doesnt realize that the vast majority of great art in the world is commercial art/ commissioned work

>Post an excerpt from your grand masterpiece and prove me wrong faggot.
keep confirming that youre a delusional kid desperate to flex, I learned once from the archives existing and would never do that again as long as I actually am going to release X and X work for real

>>12875335
Like I said im already putting a /tv/ meme in it that I actually like, the big guy shit is not funn, is the definition of reddit and far too obvious in general

>> No.12875358

>>12875350
>school shooters in a future where a near apocalyptic jihad from an alien race happened
Just say what it really is about. It's not like anyone from here is going to buy your book.

>> No.12875365

>>12875350
Epic
Still, you used wet and warm together too much, thats objectively bad writing isnt it?

>> No.12875377

>>12875104
>wrote the best work of literature from the past 100 years
>has to ask 4chan to help him with inserting ebin meme references into it
lmao

>> No.12875380
File: 337 KB, 1280x1933, 1544409566572.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875380

>>12875358
that, except that neither of them actually "shoot" up a "school", the idea is still the same. And yes, no shit the explanation is retardedly simple and doesnt actually reflect the content well. Tonally its probably a mixture of something like evil dead, book of the new sun, star wars and silent hill

>>12875365
no, its simply objectively low effort and designed for brainlets to read quickly with one hand

>> No.12875406
File: 246 KB, 640x640, 31BD7880-A5E5-458F-8E49-C55F564C3D7E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875406

>>12875380
>I-its not like I was trying or anything! It was low effort, l-lol...

Thanks man, I needed a laugh today

>> No.12875426
File: 636 KB, 2191x2191, 1524111324390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875426

>>12875406
How fucking retarded are you? Yes, Ive spent slightly under a year now writing this book, thats effort. Writing a two chapter erotica in 2 hours with one round of checking for typos is not effort, its the definition of effortless and its easy when you can actually write instead of trying to "write" like the brainlets like you. Keep moving the goalpost though, perfectly shows just how insecude, delusional and stupid you are. Id tell you to post something you wrote for comparisons sake but I wont because im actually not an embarrassing brainlet like you who thinks it would actually prove something when the kids like you are literally writing your one chapter experiments over and over and then desperately pick the most "writerly" paragraph "casually" out of the shit to post here for flexing

>> No.12875431

>>12875380
So what I'm getting is that some recluses/misanthropes/loners are in a future where aliens possessing supernatural powers have almost destroyed the planet because it ties to their belief or something

>> No.12875445

>>12875426
So you wrote it on automatic in two hours and feel prod of doing so?
Even then, it still shows that you, when unfocused and natural, write objectively bad.
Whos your favourite author btw?

>> No.12875451

Everyone is trolled by OP

>> No.12875470
File: 52 KB, 470x600, 1484888859000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875470

>>12875451
>make elaborate thread
>double down
>end up writing more than your critics
I don't think OP was trolling anyone. And if he was, making people ask questions about your work isn't really trolling.

>> No.12875475

>>12875470
This
Newfags call being retarded on purpose trolling

>> No.12875478
File: 68 KB, 767x1024, 1547378679609.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12875478

>>12875431
To be fair im trying to keep it as vague as possible but youre maybe 1/4th accurate

Explaining it in a 4chan posts, especially ambiguously is not going to do it any favors

>>12875445
>and feel prod
of what? being able to work without panting and sweating and "trying to write" like the style brainlets here? Yes, it means that I actually know how to write professional, mechanical prose and structure a work

>write objectively bad.
saying something doesnt make it true, see you at argument class kiddo

>>12875470
>making people ask questions about your work
something I never did then, I asked what is a good inside joke to slip in for users of the board

>> No.12875504

>>12875478
Reiteration is bad no matter how you slice it so your text that was supposed to showcase your professional mechanical writing failed

>> No.12875510

if this is bait, good job
if this isn't bait, you legitimately deserve to be doxxed

>> No.12875512

>>12875504
So youre saying that Dostoevsky was an "objectively bad" writer and every single page of crime and punishment is "objectively bad"? Right? Surely youre going to give me your reasoning here that confirms that you arent just a retarded wannabe

>> No.12875585

>>12875512
Post evidence

>> No.12875590

>>12875585
Wow. Thanks for the laugh brainlet and thanks for confirming how fucking stupid you are