/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12789612]

Was Deleuze a Taoist sage?

[Anonymous No.12789624]

Deleuze, Gilles. Don't like him.

[Anonymous No.12789651]

No. All Eastern philosophy is meme tier.

[Anonymous No.12789712]

What does it say about reading Deleuze's works that his proponents are driven to fanatically spam him on an anonymous literature forum, the same person doing so by cycling through the same 12 or so ways of asking a question about him with the same pictures.

The amount an author is spammed is inverse to their quality, because amazing books and authors leave one so satisfied and blissful that one is entirely contented and feels no need to spam them; you can tell that this person making all these threads still has a hole he is trying to fill in his heart and is misdirecting that energy to 4chan. True top-level authors/thinkers are never spammed because reading them leads to ecstatic and wonderful experiences that make people not care about 4chan for a while, the fundamental urge of curiosity and desire for amusement that leads one to post and lurk on 4chan in the first place is attenuated and superseded for the time being by actual quality lit; which Deleuze is sadly not.

[Anonymous No.12789730]

>>12789712
This is true and the reason Coil or Bach are never spammed on /mu/.

[Anonymous No.12789854]

>>12789712
people are usually spammed on here because they are interesting and people want to know more about them

[Anonymous No.12789909]

>>12789712
Anyone making these threads and especially anyone that calls themselves a "deleuzian" has not read Deleuze

[Anonymous No.12789952]

>>12789712
>>12789909
Good posts, Deleuzetryhard blown the fuck out

It's a shame because Deleuze is kind of cool but he's being wrapped in a shell of shit by this person

[Anonymous No.12789965]

[Anonymous No.12789979]

>>12789612
body without organs, territorialization, de-territorialization, socius, shizio, desiring-machines, your anus

[Anonymous No.12790021]

>>12789965
Interesting, thanks

[Anonymous No.12790752]

Delueze, Gilles. Dislike him. A cheap wordsmith, crazy and obscure. A schizophrenic, a claptrap metaphysicist and a slapdash Spinozan. Some of his philosophy is extraordinarily nonsensical. Nobody takes his Body-Without-Organs seriously.
Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. His best work, though an obvious and shameless imitation of Bacon's "Essays"
Difference and Repetition. Dislike it intensely.
Anti-Oedipus. Dislike it intensely. Ghastly haunting.

[Anonymous No.12790809]

>>12789712
the guys spamming these threads are saboteurs, trying to generate hostility toward these thinkers and put people off from pursuing them on their own.

[Anonymous No.12790828]

I love Deleuze because me and my fellow
anonymous internet friends think he's really cool and he has some good words that I learned which I can use for a quick laugh because I'm not funny or interesting myself.

[Anonymous No.12790875]

>>12789612

He was a charlatanist

[Anonymous No.12790879]

>>12789612
It just amazes me that people get to live and make money off being a philosopher, even if they are apparently obscurantists and sophists. Not that I'm saying he is; I'm saying many seem to claim it true for him. But he was probably a millionaire despite this fact. And how the heck does someone become a millionaire and a celebrity while being a sophist, if there are wiser people out there who could be taking that fame from them? Big, if true.

[Anonymous No.12790940]

>>12790809
ive been wondering about this, but I think it is equally as likely its just some Deleuze rabid retard. memes have always been dangerous

[Anonymous No.12791135]

>>12790940
when you can draw out the few genuinely knowledgable posters then these threads are great. but it's the waiting in between, the not-so-long silences, that the idiotic can't bear, so fill with their blathering.