/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12748192]

is yang a deleuzian? will he complete the BwO?

[Anonymous No.12748208]

Nah he's just gonna add a few axiomata to displace the limit.

[Anonymous No.12748228]

wasn't deleuze an anarchist?

[Anonymous No.12748233]

>>12748228
no he was catholic

[Anonymous No.12748246]

Hes a kantian

[Anonymous No.12748262]

>>12748246
no that is trump. yang is going to ejaculate in his rectum.

[Anonymous No.12748332]

I should be paid for having been born.

[Anonymous No.12748350]

>>12748332
this but unironically

[Anonymous No.12748421]

YANG GANG

[Anonymous No.12748487]

>>12748421
based

[Anonymous No.12748508]

Are you asking if he's a pedophile?

[Gucci Leninist No.12748527]

>>12748228
He was a Marxist
>>12748233
He was an atheist

[Anonymous No.12748532]

>>12748421
YAAAAAAANG GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANG

[Anonymous No.12748735]

>>12748421
>something for everyone!
no thanks I'll take my chances with jill stein.

[Anonymous No.12748806]

>>12748421
kek literally all the domesticated trash in the world

[Anonymous No.12748843]

More like Nietzschean Last Man.

There will be no more proper civilization after this, and each successive presidential candidate will only promise more gibs to the increasingly mongrel population.
We are on our way to Idiocracy.

[Anonymous No.12748867]

>>12748228
Deleuze was closest in regards to politics to a sort of hyperlibertarianism that leads to liberation. There's layers of irony there and the best way to think about it is to not categorize Deleuze as a political thinker, merely that he is extremely applicable in politics in various ways (and towards various ends.)

[Anonymous No.12748898]

>>12748843
How exactly do you reach a world where robots do all the menial jobs without eventually having to give gibs created by those robots to people?

[Anonymous No.12748912]

>>12748898
Kill all unskilled workers

[Anonymous No.12748955]

>>12748912
>kill every one that doesnt want to be a bugman coding monkey aka the last man
good solution

[Anonymous No.12748977]

>>12748955
Never said it was a good solution, but some variation on this is the path of least resistance

[Anonymous No.12748985]

>>12748955
Oi but wut iff da robots can do dat too? Wacky innit

[Anonymous No.12749041]

>>12748912
It's amazing how many world problems can be solved by depopulation.

[Anonymous No.12749051]

>>12748332
Honestly yes. Existence is pain.

[Anonymous No.12749066]

>>12748228
>implying Yang isn't
his policies are pure left wing accelerationism

[Anonymous No.12749075]

>>12748332
if bourgeois scums are, why aren't you and me?

[Anonymous No.12749102]

>>12749066
>L/ACC
lmao

[Anonymous No.12749104]

>>12748912
>>12748843
>>12748977
>REEEE why are normal people getting free money, only my based lads on Wall Street deserves it

[Anonymous No.12749242]

>>12748806
this

[Anonymous No.12749442]

>will he complete the BwO?
what does this even mean

[Anonymous No.12749552]

>>12749442
He's going to build a fucked up table.

[Anonymous No.12749556]

>>12748192

[Anonymous No.12749605]

>>12748843
atleast ill be comfy and still have money to do stuff and not just a wage slave

[Anonymous No.12749606]

Wouldnt the rent just get higher everywhere if you got 1000 every month ? We should just hang landlords except if theyre jewish ofc

[Anonymous No.12749620]

>>12749606
why the fuck would that make the rent higher? its not like everybody is super rich just that losers can afford to have the basics of life

[Anonymous No.12749831]

who will win the election the kantian or the deleuzian?

[Anonymous No.12749858]

>>12749066
how so?

[Anonymous No.12749943]

>>12748192
Will he complete the System of German Idealism?

[Anonymous No.12750000]

>>12748233
Deleuze was as atheist as you can be but it is always wise to read French philosophy against the background of Catholicism

[Anonymous No.12750305]

>>12748192

[Anonymous No.12750316]

>>12748421
Fantastic post

[Anonymous No.12750332]

Has anyone here actually read his book, non-memeing? I've been enjoying it. Most of it is pretty normal, ie the first essay is an explanation of how modernity and capitalism is predicated upon Kantianism, and ends with a call for mass action and UBI. It gets progressively weirder though, with the later essays being basically gibberish. The deterritorializing flows of Capital are a pathway to many abilities some consider to be of a highly schizophrenic character.

[Anonymous No.12750400]

>>12750332
post a passage

[Anonymous No.12750420]

So is this guy being pushed by accelerationists so shit hits the fan sooner or what?

[Anonymous No.12750442]

What is an accelerationist? I see it being used to refer to both people who want to cause chaos and post-human machine cultists

[Anonymous No.12750458]

>>12750420
no he is being pushed by neet losers (me) to get yangbux so I can work on my postmodern literary doorstopper masterpiece

[Anonymous No.12750469]

>>12750420
i also want a chink in the white house for the memes and he unironically has some nice policies

[Anonymous No.12750484]

>>12750400
The logic of the meritocracy is leading us to ruin, because we are collectively primed to ignore the voices of the millions getting pushed into economic distress by the grinding wheels of automation and innovation. We figure they’re complaining or suffering because they’re losers.

We need to break free of this logic of the marketplace before it’s too late.

We must reshape and accelerate society to bring us all to higher ground. We must find new ways to organize ourselves independent of the values that the marketplace assigns to each and every one of us.

As Bismarck said, “If revolution there is to be, let us rather undertake it not undergo it.” Society will change either before or after the revolution. I choose before.

We are more than the numbers on our paychecks -- and we are going to have to prove it very quickly. We must reboot the US government.

No doubt this may result in a system by which a new permanent government must not retain employ or reward anyone into a revolution which does have personal continuity with the new. Permanent government must happen interim administration is not a gradual effort in the new permanent governmentally moving into a restoration which a new party did in bringing the two. Just as the new permanent government. It’s true that both sex and rape involve an in a single step. It is not a gradual effort, but both involve penetration of responsible government. It’s true that both sex and rape involved in bringing into a reset effective an in a simple way to saddle it with the reset about. A successful reset must happen in a sinister, purposes. A reset can degenerate into a revolution. No doubt many involved in their arbitrary, and usually sinister, purposes. A revolution. A reset is not a revolution. A reset is not a revolution. No doubt many involve an interim administration which does have penetrations.

[Anonymous No.12750513]

>>12750484
...but the matter with history is that it “can solely be comprehended through its effects, and ne'er directly as some reified force,” to quote Fredric Jameson. we are able to solely retrospectively acknowledge history’s presence and its manifestation, and that i assume it’s attainable to try to to thus up till this point; thus why not still create mentally history as a broadly speaking remodeling context? we'd not be ready to map it in its current state, however that doesn’t mean it’s nonexistent.

[Anonymous No.12750555]

>>12750513
I find it quite interesting that (putting aside the college-tier liberals and their obsession with commodified micro-struggles) contemporary left is usually one of the few collectives to truly bring into question that we may not be able to dissociate the individual freedoms acquired from technology from a kind of globalized system of exploitation of our desires.

Whereas even the most stark defenders of progress for its own sake such as Peter Thiel, would rather end democracy before conceiving that we might have to hold back the evolution of technique (not quite primitivism, but certainly also not the Landian levels of production we have today), we have people like pic related who are more or less fed up with what they perceive as being entrapped inside ourselves. Certainly we are the happiest generation in terms of comfort and luxury, and so much in excess of both, that we are reaching numbing levels of depression and lack of awareness of others.

Discussions on this facet of atomization rarely take part in any liberal circle, no matter if it's Jeff Bezos or Bernie Sanders using the microphone. I am not sure where exactly to pinpoint this, but somewhere along the lines, the reins of critical theory were apparently taken back from people, to the structures that continued to enslave them. On the "right" side you have meaningless talk of money already assumed as a thing-in-itself, rending all criticisms useless because of its self-fulfilling drive (neocons and ancaps alike have no doubts that technology is freeing them from nature, even as it clutches them with more and more strength into a whole new structure). And even to the left side, it sadly appears to me that technique has also won and we are in a redundant fight for micro-struggles, positions we necessarily drop when they endanger our personal comfort.

[Anonymous No.12750617]

>>12750469
Memes are always good but
>nice policies
What are some of them? UBI sure isn't

[Anonymous No.12750742]

>>12750617
nothing wrong with ubi
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/

[Anonymous No.12751172]

Bump

[Anonymous No.12751192]

this hits to close to home.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3701vXQzxo

[Anonymous No.12751377]

>>12748228
he was a proto-neoliberal

[Anonymous No.12751408]

>>12749620
Because I as a landlord know you can pay more than you already are paying because you're getting 1000 bucks a month. I will charge you more and you will pay or move out.

[Anonymous No.12751418]

>>12748192
are these the finals days of America and anglo supremacy?
The right side of America is shrinking each decade and more people favor "socialist" policies. but even if the left side wins the entirety of the country it would not last because its anti-war nature, remember what Kissinger said "Empires have no interest in operating within an international system; they aspire to be the international system. Empires have no need for a balance of power. That is how the United States has conducted its foreign policy in the Americas, and China through most of its history in Asia."

[Anonymous No.12751423]

>>12751377
wtf how?

[Anonymous No.12751438]

>>12751408
>pay or move out
My wife and I are outfitting a van as a class B camper and with 3000/month (including our kid) we can do nothing but travel and create art. As god intended.

[Anonymous No.12751485]

>>12751418
that mindset is outdated

[Anonymous No.12751490]

He wants to bring a similar system to Chinas new social credit system, for that reason alone he can fuck himself.

https://www.yang2020.com/policies/modern-time-banking/

[Anonymous No.12751504]

>>12751490
what exactly is bad about this?

[Anonymous No.12751551]

PLEASE VOTE FOR YANG I DON'T WANT TO DIE AS A STREET URCHIN

[Anonymous No.12751579]

>>12748421
>Cringey /pol/tards get outright rejected by the candidate all the memes told him to follow

[Anonymous No.12751581]

>>12751377
How could he be proto if neoliberalism is 100 years older than him?

[Anonymous No.12751588]

>>12751490
Not similar in anyway since it doesn't punish you for wrongthink or wrongdoing.

[Anonymous No.12751607]

>>12748192
no

[Anonymous No.12751616]

>>12751581
neoliberalism did not exist in the 1860's

[Anonymous No.12751672]

>>12751485
only decadents find that kind of thought outdated but for nations with a conqueror mindset isn't.

[Anonymous No.12751705]

>>12751423
he and all his French friends had a great influence on the protests of May 68 which led the way to neoliberalism.

[Anonymous No.12751731]

Yang is neoliberal in the mold before the Chicago School hijacked it.

[Anonymous No.12751748]

>>12751438
Don't think you get it until you're 18

[Anonymous No.12751826]

>>12751377
>>12751423
His son is a consultant

[Anonymous No.12752062]

>>12751705
I don't think you know what neoliberalism means.

[Anonymous No.12752075]

>>12748192
>"complete" the BwO

[Anonymous No.12752108]

>using neoliberal as pejorative

[Anonymous No.12752160]

>>12752075
yeah that doesnt make sense I guess he was thinking of saying something like the "trump is going to complete the system of german idealism" meme in deleuzian terms.

[Anonymous No.12752295]

He is a Landian

[Anonymous No.12752469]

>>12752075
literally no one here has read deleuze they just meme his terminology

[Anonymous No.12752477]

>>12752469
you are hanging out in the wrong threads

[Anonymous No.12752502]

>>12752469
Me and Nick Land are among the few individuals to fully understand the implications of Deleuzean thought and achieve the BwO. It is no coincidence that we both went insane soon after. Six visits to the psych ward later after deterritorializing myself with hardcore psychedelics, I have now returned to the fold of Platonism. The ethics of difference, it would seem, end only in a padded cell or a coffin. For my mother's sake, I now adhere to virtue ethics. Kinda miss fucking bipolar scene sluts but then again that's probably how I ended up with HPV. I only hope my future wife can forgive me my immature philosophical infatuation.

[Anonymous No.12752706]

https://cyclonotrope.wordpress.com/2017/06/12/unconditional-accelerationism-as-antipraxis/

[Anonymous No.12752851]

hmmm

[Anonymous No.12752956]

>>12752062
I don't think you either.

[Anonymous No.12752969]

i want a baudrillardian prez desu

[Anonymous No.12752982]

>>12752851
>bioleninism

he fucking reads spandrell

[Anonymous No.12753035]

>>12748898
>What will we do when the mechanical loom puts all of the textile workers out of business?

[Anonymous No.12753042]

>>12750305
wtf is positive nihilism

[Anonymous No.12753052]

>>12750305
>>12752851
are these real tweets?

[Anonymous No.12753072]

[Anonymous No.12753083]

>>12752851
and he's running as a democrat lmao

[Anonymous No.12753105]

>>12753042
The rejection of predetermined limits upon action and self-transformation.

[Anonymous No.12753127]

The next White House Chief Strategist

[Anonymous No.12753138]

How come you guys still haven't learned to detect an astroturf?

[Anonymous No.12753147]

Memes as agitprop internetism starting to pay off it seems.

[Anonymous No.12753189]

>>12753052
the foucalt one is obv fake

[Anonymous No.12753214]

>>12753147
trump was elected through cyber agitprop. not russian propaganda--sheer idiot memery.
expect potentially similar results if they can mob and lob this one into the mass media circuit. yang lacks trump's grotesque magnetism, so it won't be the same toss-and-catch, but who knowsss.

[Anonymous No.12753241]

>>12753138
the nigga bribed a million neets with the promise of yangbucks what did you think was going to happen

[Anonymous No.12753284]

>>12753241
this

its the same hysteria liberals had with 'russian bots' promoting trump, but its now the trumptards who are yelling 'muh discord tranny'

[Anonymous No.12753290]

yang

[Anonymous No.12753308]

IN THE SQUAD I TRUST
FOR THE SQUAD I BUST

[Anonymous No.12753309]

>>12753147
hyperstition-spreading IS praxis. If you fail to understand that, you fail to understand what a hyperstition is. Hyperstitions make themselves into "elements of effective culture". they shape the actual telos/arc of events, etc. A good example of a hyperstition is "growth is good". it underlies basically all modern economics (at least non-marxist economics), and is taken for granted, yet never proven/questioned... it's a hyperstition that will lead eventually to planetary and economic collapse.

[Anonymous No.12753317]

>>12753309
Yang is self-aware of this property and has made himself the ultimate forced meme.

[Anonymous No.12753340]

29 KB JPG
If you guys don't stop shilling this slant-eyed freak in my 4chan I swear to God I am going to devote the next 2 years of my fucking neetdom to slandering his name in every fucking internet message board that exists or will exist. You do not understand how little of a life I have. I will put in quadruple the effort of even your most devote shill and I will do it all for free. I will create meme upon meme and sow doubt like a motherfucker. If you do not stop with this bullshit right this fucking instant you are going to create a very powerful enemy indeed. I do not like Communists and I am on the verge of dedicating the next 2 years of my life to take this bellend down. I have 133 IQ. I am well versed in meme-warfare. I have been a member of Anonymous for over a decade.
You are messing with the wrong man.
Back off. Now.

[Anonymous No.12753346]

>>12748898

>How exactly do you reach a world where tractors do all the farming without eventually having to give food created by those tractors to farmers?

[Anonymous No.12753351]

>>12753340
>29 KB JPG
basé

[Anonymous No.12753368]

>>12753351
>I guess they never miss huh?

[Anonymous No.12753497]

>>12753138
in one scenario isreal keep getting money in the other YOU get money

[Anonymous No.12753499]

>>12748421
I won’t allow you fuckers to elect a Chinese spy in the name of dank memes

[Anonymous No.12753506]

>>12753499
The fire rises brother

[Anonymous No.12753609]

>>12753499
He's Taiwanese you dumb slut.

[Anonymous No.12753622]

>>12753609
a gook is a gook

[Anonymous No.12753714]

>>12753035
>>12753346
Past technological advancement/automation created more jobs than it eliminated. Not the case anymore. That's why the discussion is happening.

[Anonymous No.12754071]

>>12751490
How did you manage to misunderstand that so badly? It's absolutely nothing like China's social credit system. Yang's is an incentive program whereby volunteers are rewarded for improving their communities. No one is compelling you to do it, and you aren't penalized if you decide you don't want to.

[Anonymous No.12754090]

>>12753138
It was obvious very early, but I like Yang anyway so I don't mind.

[Anonymous No.12754128]

>w-we can still make a difference if we keep voting!

[Anonymous No.12754332]

>>12754128
Of course you can. Ever hear of Brexit, or a man named Donald J. Trump?

[Anonymous No.12754565]

>>12754332
I sincerely hope you are being sarcastic