/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12713780]

is there any book that proves ethics are objective and not just slave morality?

[Anonymous No.12713785]

Who cares? You will never be a master and it is objective that you will have to get along with people.

[Anonymous No.12713790]

>>12713785
t. discord tranny

[Anonymous No.12713793]

>>12713785
Who are you to say

[Anonymous No.12713807]

>>12713780
Fuck trannies

[Anonymous No.12713810]

>>12713780
the term your looking for is "spook". Slave morality is something else entirely, brainlet pseud.

[Anonymous No.12713870]

>>12713780
"Slave morality" is a specific category of morality type based on its historical prevalence among slaves and serfs with its ostensible origin in the ressentiment of owned persons. You could as well have said "is there any book that proves ethics are objective and not just master morality?" and your post would make as much (i.e. as little) sense.

Lots of philosophers have tried to do this, I don't think any have succeeded. Kant, Descartes, and Spinoza all attempted this in one way or another. But you really should just start with the Greeks.

[Anonymous No.12713903]

>>12713780
the bible

[Anonymous No.12713918]

>>12713780
sauce

[Anonymous No.12713942]

>>12713903
nice meme

[Anonymous No.12713948]

>>12713780
Do you think life on this planet could continue into the future without any kind of system of ethics to keep our desires in due balance?

The answer is no, and it won't, because we do not live by or have a system that tells us how to do it. We are running off the edge of a cliff.
>>12713903
See above.

[Anonymous No.12713950]

>>12713780
MOOOODDDS

[Anonymous No.12713975]

>>12713780
Does the "is morality objective or not?" thing makes any sense when it comes to virtue ethics?

[Anonymous No.12713980]

>>12713870
Greeks are brainlet debnt incurrers
>>12713780
Read Summa Theologia and Refutation of all Heresies. Crusaders did nothing wrong, Byzzies had it coming to them.

[Anonymous No.12714008]

>>12713950
>m-m-mods p-please protect me and my delicate snowflake incel sensibilities
you've made a powerful enemy snitchboi

[Anonymous No.12714011]

>>12713980
>calls others brainlets
>recommends Aquinas

[Anonymous No.12714026]

>>12713780
name ?

[Anonymous No.12714041]

>>12714008
based

[Anonymous No.12714060]

>>12713980
>Refutation of all Heresies
Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle each individually accomplished far more of value for the world than anything any Christian that ever existed did without Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle.

[Anonymous No.12714575]

>>12714060
Calculus made by Christians are much more sophisticated achievements than those of the ancients. The Greeks are overrated. Egyptians, Sumers, and Harappans had geometry locked down already. Greeks just had people to ascribe theorems to.
>>12714011
>meme response
Efficiency curve=met

[Anonymous No.12714670]

>>12714575
I know you're an illiterate fucktard, but Kepler was Newtons greatest influence, and guess who Keplers greatest influence was? Your little Jewish book contributed fucking nothing to science you degenerate.

[Anonymous No.12714684]

>>12714575
Where in the Bible did the development of Calculus come from?

[Anonymous No.12714700]

>>12714670
what about Mendel?

[Anonymous No.12714723]

>>12714684
Logos

Who is the girl

[Anonymous No.12714745]

>>12714700
What part of the Bible inspired Mendel's work.
Why did the Latin speaking West produce nothing of value for a thousand years until Greeks were translated to Latin initiating the Renaissance, named for a Rebirth of pagan Greek learning.

[Anonymous No.12714753]

>>12714745
Allow me to say "retranslated"
Christians, Catholics in particular, are humongous fucktards who hate knowledge.

[Anonymous No.12714761]

>>12714745
is this bait?

[Anonymous No.12714792]

>>12714761
>is this bait?
Are you pretending to be retarded? I hope so.

Renaissance, (French: “Rebirth”) period in European civilization immediately following the Middle Ages and conventionally held to have been characterized by a surge of interest in Classical scholarship and values. The Renaissance also witnessed the discovery and exploration of new continents, the substitution of the Copernican for the Ptolemaic system of astronomy

>the Fall of Constantinople (1453) generated a wave of émigré Greek scholars bringing precious manuscripts in ancient Greek, many of which had fallen into obscurity in the West.

[Anonymous No.12714871]

>>12714792
What is this 1960, the middle ages are now understood as culturally sophisticated regardless of the proximity to classical culture

[Anonymous No.12714885]

>>12714792
>he fell for the dark ages meme

[Anonymous No.12714959]

>>12714871
If you ever decide to read the works of Renaissance thinkers you'll see they all worked off ancient Greek writings.
>>12714885
>being this much of a shill

[Anonymous No.12714969]

https://youtu.be/dIEemKcy-4E

watch this, about Natural Law

then pass it on. long, but worth it. get ready to take notes.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12714970]

>>12714885
>it was all a part of gods five hundred year plan
>humans actually do nothing for themselves
You see how dumb you sound?

[Anonymous No.12714973]

>>12714959
Particularly Kepler, Copernicus, and Galileo.
The main contribution Christianity played in their work was banning it.
Kepler felt he was Pythagoras reborn.

[Anonymous No.12714977]

>>12714970
a man who impersonates a trannie tripfag known for her shite opinions and illiteracy is calling me stupid. get filtered pleb.

>>12714959
>being this much of a meme

[Anonymous No.12714991]

>>12714977
Stop posting

[Anonymous No.12715000]

>>12714973
Discorso sopra i massimi sistemi is incredibly based, Galileo basically calls the pope a retard

[Anonymous No.12715026]

>>12715000
Galileo is irrelevant today

The age of enlightenment could as easily be called the age of theft. Politicians used their status to steal from the crown, church, and generally behave reprehensibly you wouldn't seriously view the title one faction gives to its rival uncritically

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12715037]

>>12714977
Gtfo my board, poltard

[Anonymous No.12715066]

>>12715026
>Galileo is irrelevant today
Ok. Christianity is irrelevant today.

[Anonymous No.12715068]

>>12713780
name anyone ?

[Anonymous No.12715076]

>>12714991
>>12715037
and what are you two fags gonna do if I don't?

I'll answer that for you
a) impotently bitch and whine
b)absolutely fucking nothing.

[Anonymous No.12715079]

>>12715026
>Galileo is irrelevant today
what

[Anonymous No.12715081]

>>12714977
>her

[Anonymous No.12715085]

>>12715076
Continue to comment on your childish intelligence.

[Anonymous No.12715110]

>>12715000
Checked.
Heres a copy in English for people who want to read some Galileo.
https://mega.nz/#!9VcGzYyA!P7DwAp_p5js9AQz-T3d1Eh1ZY8GebWGvzhdD2AZkvLY

[Anonymous No.12715138]

>>12713790
>>12713807
Who gives a fuck if she used to have a dick, won't stop me from bustin' a nut to her.

[Anonymous No.12715434]

>>12713780
Can we get a name

[Anonymous No.12715561]

>>12713918 >>12714026 >>12714723 >>12715068 >>12715434
For the boys
>https://www.instagram.com/niecewaidhofer/?hl=en

[Anonymous No.12715688]

>>12713780
Max Stirner's work. He demonstrates that not being an egoist (doing whatever you desire) is irrational

[Anonymous No.12715742]

>>12715561
BASED

[S.A.G.E No.12715788]

>>12714885
>>12714970
Will you give insightful replies or remain in the shadow of retardation?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12715802]

>>12715788
Is my brevity that bothers you?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12715813]

>>12715802
>Is it my brevity that bothers you*

It was: Is my brevity what bothers you, but I went back for just the one word.
I’m sure you don’t care.

[S.A.G.E No.12715836]

>>12715813
you're worrying too much, and it doesn't matter. I wanted to hear your honest view as opposed to what that anon believed, can you do that?

[Anonymous No.12715920]

>>12713780

WHY?! WHY MUST YOU TORMENT ME SO WITH THESE JEZEBELS? All I want to do is come here for an asexual experience that will exercise my brain but I am constantly titillated by these vixens with their prodigious hips and provocative figures. Can I never satiate this thirst, will I ever know the touch of a woman and enter between her loins? Will my seed ever drip from her moistened hole?

Life is a constant hell. No wonder I resent women too.

[Anonymous No.12715994]

>>12715561
What the fuck is this? The posts are ridiculous and have nothing to do with the softcore porn she's posting. I find it hard to believe this is a serious account or even run by her.

[Anonymous No.12716172]

>>12713780
>>12713785
>>12713793
>>12713807
>>12713810
>>12713870
>>12713903
>>12713918
>>12713942
>>12713948
>>12713950
>>12713975
>>12713980
>>12714008
>>12714011
>>12714026
>>12714041
>>12714060
>>12714575
>>12714670
>>12714684
>>12714700
>>12714723
>>12714745
>>12714753
>>12714761
>>12714792
>>12714871
>>12714885
>>12714959
>>12714969
>>12714970
>>12714973
>>12714977
>>12714991
>>12715000
>>12715026
>>12715037
>>12715066
>>12715068
>>12715076
>>12715079
>>12715081
>>12715085
>>12715110
>>12715138
>>12715434
>>12715561
>>12715688
>>12715742
>>12715788
>>12715802
>>12715813
>>12715836
>>12715920
>>12715994
god damn it discord trannies FUCK OFF

[Anonymous No.12716584]

>>12713975
No, which is why virtue ethics are unironically the way to go. I used to scoff at them but their benefits are undeniable.
Namely, you don't autistically adhere yourself to moral laws like Kantianism or Utilitarianism, cornering yourself with your own moral statements and forcing yourself into ridiculous moral dilemmas.

Virtue ethics are demonstrably subjective, which is their strength

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oEULhtSEDhe No.12716661]

>>12715836
Yeah

[Anonymous No.12716693]

>>12716172
>"M-mom! Look! I r-replied to all the posts!"

[Anonymous No.12716768]

>>12713780
tiddies

[Anonymous No.12716794]

>>12715994
lol who actually reads the posts

[Anonymous No.12716823]

i want to have sEX with her

[S.A.G.E No.12717262]

>>12716661
...well?

[Anonymous No.12717342]

>>12713780
Nicomachean Ethics, brainlet

[Anonymous No.12717490]

>>12713780
You really need a book to prove that to you? Ethics are a strategy, both the concepts and their implementations exist objectively. What you're probably wondering is if ethics are -universal- and the answer is no. Values follow from our natures as valuing agents, so while there is significant overlap, variance in nature makes ture universality of values impossible.

[Anonymous No.12717761]

"Morality" is a byproduct of humans being social animals. Haidt's moral foundations theory provides an explanation to general trends in ethics and straddles the line of objective/subjective.