[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 90 KB, 1080x1030, 1543782612056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12668407 No.12668407 [Reply] [Original]

Phiosophers that are garbage/were wrong about everything/had no talent/not worth reading
Plato (moron/wrong about everything/non-intellectual reading for people to dick around on the train)
Descartes (moron)
Heidegger (wrong/takes the worst aspects of nietzsche/a crybaby nazi that hated technology)
Marcus Aurelius (cuck philosophy)
Cicero (cuck philosophy)
Seneca (cuck philosophy)
The Scholastics and really any christcuck (morons/wrong/produced nothing of value)
Hobbes (moron)
Berkeley (moron)
Sartre (moron)
Husserl (nothing of value/boring)
Freud (moron)
Lacan (a bore)
Rand (moron)
Chomsky (nothing of value)
Russell (moron)

Philosophers worth reading
Kant (dont even like him but he is necessary)
Marx and all the 20th century Marxists
The late 20th century postmodernists ie. Deleuze (genius/the james joyce of philosophy), Foucault, Baudrilard (based), Virilio, Derrida
Mcluhan
Aristotle
Spinoza
Nietzsche (based)
Stirner (for the memes)
German Idealists
Montaigne (comfy)
Heraclitus
Whitehead (genius)
Bergson
Bataille
Michelstraedter
Leibniz
Epicurus
Lucretius
Taoists (chad philosophy)
Voltaire
Hume

>> No.12668413
File: 415 KB, 999x925, Beja man - Sudan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12668413

>>12668407
what is cuck philosophy

>> No.12668433

>>12668407
your under 18 it seems

>> No.12668443

>>12668407
This is such a fedora tipping reddit tier post.

>> No.12668451

>>12668407
I will agree with one thing, Baudrillard was indeed based

>> No.12668458

>>12668407
Would the guy on the right be considered attractive? The others look good but he looks kinda funny.

>> No.12668464
File: 48 KB, 500x625, 1550396131631.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12668464

>>12668407
>the james joyce of philosophy
i actually cringed while reading that

>> No.12668500

>>12668458
he’s a proto-Bog

>> No.12668506

>>12668464
that's not wrong though

>> No.12668515

>>12668464
How can a drunken wreck who can't even form proper sentences be considered a good writer?

>> No.12668556

>"how do I induce MAXIMUM cringe on /lit/?"
you got me op

>> No.12668565

>>12668433
No offense, but I have a hard time believing a 18 year old would know all those names.

>> No.12668578

>>12668565
I knew most of them when I was 16. Still haven't read most of them tho

>> No.12668579

>>12668565
What are Wikipedia and high school critical thinking reading lists?

>> No.12668590

>>12668407
What exactly distinguishes Taoism as chad and Stoicism as cuck?

>> No.12668595

>>12668458
To lookism spergs who have fetish for bones

>> No.12668619 [DELETED] 

Anyone know if Big D has ever written anything on Joyce?

>> No.12668635

Anyone know if Big D has ever written anything on Joyce? I like the stuff be has written on Proust, Beckett, and Melville.

>> No.12669074

B&R

>> No.12669083

>>12668565
Most zoomers probably know the names of these people nowadays thanks to e-celebs like Jordan Wankerson

>> No.12669118

>>12669083
Ive never heard Virilio mentioned here or by any e-celebs

>> No.12669286

>>12668407
Yeah......... that’s gonna be a hard yikes from me

>> No.12669669

LOL

>> No.12669704

>>12668407
>Marx
Lol. Let me know when you actually read these guys, instead of skimming wiki articles and watching youtube vids on the way to work.

>> No.12669751

>>12668407
secretly based list, but don't tell anyone

>> No.12669917

I know OP is memeing and being and edgelord but he's not even wrong LOL

>> No.12669921
File: 2 KB, 124x121, 1550671361615s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12669921

Tonight the Deleuzeheads come out

>> No.12669925 [DELETED] 

Not cool nigga, don't post actual cursed images

>> No.12669942

>>12669704
it's funny because you haven't read anything from Marx

>> No.12669980

>>12669118
He died this past September, serious Catholic, War and Cinema's great.

>> No.12670006

>>12668407
This is a copy pasta. Do not engage with it.

>> No.12670030

>>12668407
Ummm... Yeah. Based!

>> No.12670041

>>12668458
He looks too perfect. Like a high elf or something. Attractive but intimidatingly so. A giga-Chad, if you will

>> No.12670855

bump

>> No.12672576

>>12668407
Why is Nietzsche in both categories?

>> No.12672583

>>12668407
holy epic upvoted

>> No.12672973

>>12672576
He isnt

>> No.12673008

>>12668407
Surprisingly based. Take out sartre. Too overhated on this board and so many of his ideas were genuinely good

>> No.12673331

>>12668407
>be a handsome and well-built
>wear graphic-T's
wtf

>> No.12673379
File: 638 KB, 1800x2440, 1548590466595.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12673379

>>12668458
He's a fraud. This is how he looks irl.

>> No.12673435

>>12673379
Lmao can't be real

>> No.12673465

>>12669118

Virilio is the biggest pseud ever, aside from some of Baudrillard’s followers. Open sky was an open sore.

>> No.12673520

>>12668413
Plato

>> No.12673524

>>12668407
Move Spinoza and this list would be based and redpilled

>> No.12673554

>>12668407
Literally agree with everything except Plato, Descartes, Heidegger and Husserl
Also
>Nietzsche (based)
based

>> No.12673555

>>12668407
Even mentioning Rand at all is giving it far too much attention. Why should it be listed among philosophers, good or bad, for the fan-fiction it created?

>> No.12673584

All philosophers between 17th century and 1870 are completely useless. The same for all thinkers between 1945 and 2001.

>> No.12673595

>>12668443
Your mom tips my fedora for me while I make sweet love to her ass.

>> No.12673612

>>12673584
unbased and cringepilled

>> No.12673622

>>12668407
>takes the worst aspects of nietzsche
Care to extrapolate?

>> No.12673632

I think I posted something similar to this post like two years ago and got btfo

>> No.12673744

>>12673584
All philosophy before the 18th century was useless and moronic. Philosophy peaked in the late 20th century.

>> No.12673873

>>12668579
No one in my highschool knew half of those names aside from the more famous ones that are taught in class. Even most of the stuff they teach about those said philosophers is pretty badly explained. the "I think therefore i am" is probably the worst meme highschool made me believe.

>> No.12673881

>>12673744
Philosophy died in the 20th Century and post modernism was the cause of death.

>> No.12673883

>>12673379
Wtf is the need to add those bimbo looking lips in the photoshop?

>> No.12673914

>>12673744
Imagine not knowing that all the fundamental questions of existence were realized and solved by eastern sages before the 5th century B.C. and that all this is just the extended end-credits playing out in the mind of God

>> No.12674046

>>12673881
Postmodernism is the peak of philosophy everything before it was intellectual masturbation and trying to answer useless questions..

>> No.12674050

>>12668407
>he took the time out of his day to write this shitty bait
>i took the time out of my day to reply to this shitty bait

>> No.12674133

>>12673379
Well he looks better in real life. The top image is a mistake.

>> No.12674261

>>12668407
Camus

>> No.12674305
File: 362 KB, 481x461, cat-wtf-face-confused-reaction-1416276006g.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12674305

>>12674046
Is this bait or do you truly not understand the irony of what you just said?

>> No.12674579

>>12673379
this is a major cope, you dont really think that the dude on the bottom is the same dude right? I mean Ive heard about autistic faceblindness but you cant really believe that right? You can check every detail and theyre all off, nobody would for example photoshop away a pierced ear.

>> No.12674719

>>12668407
This is
I agree with this. Damn. Wasn’t expecting it. Coulda wrote this myself. Although chomsky’s US foreign policy work is pretty insightful

>> No.12675076

>>12674305
fuck off Peterson drone

>> No.12675156

Cicero was a total boss, he was the peak Roman stylist and an excellent rhetoritician. I don't care what you think of his philosophy, the man had true mastery over the arts of his time

>> No.12676167

This thread made me realise something. The idea of a single continuum in "Western philosophy" is essentially Cartesian revionism, which has co-opted many non-rationalist thinkers to be little more than advocates of Cartesian rationalism.

Descartes Delenda Est

>> No.12676229

>>12674719
Agreed

>> No.12676254

>>12668407
Let’s be friends, OP

>> No.12676448

>the james joyce of philosophy
this is unironically true if you think about it

>> No.12677882

>>12668407
Sartre was wrong on some issues but definitely not without huge merit.
Very much worth reading

>> No.12677892

>>12676167
based

>> No.12677923

>>Plato isn’t based
>>Whitehead is based
Oboy, you haven’t read Whitehead then I suppose

>> No.12677927

>>12668407
The worst thing about chads is that they're really nice dudes.

>> No.12677966

>>12668407
OP is a gigantic fag

>> No.12678035

>>12668407
disagree re: heidegger and freud

agree re: everything else
also based re: virilio, but how can you call out heidegger for hating technology but not virilio?

>> No.12678090

>>12677923
Whitehead shits on Platonism

>> No.12678140

stoicism is for cucks indeed

>> No.12678183

>>12673524
Came here to post this and thought I'd be the only one. Sartre's book Nausea actually has a great deal of literary merit and is a pulpy Steppenwolf, wouldn't avoid him if you're looking for a literary read.

I disagree with Russell and Chomsky. Producing Consent by Chomsky and On the Defense of Idleness and the Conquest of Happiness are all immensely helpful -yet not deeply philosophical- works.

>>12678035
Because Heidigger has the IQ of a dead infant

>> No.12678193

>>12668413
Great Youtube channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSkzHxIcfoEr69MWBdo0ppg

>> No.12678203

>>12678183
look, i hate heidegger too, he was a nazi, a pleb and a shit writer, but he has some important concepts and his influence cannot be underestimated

>> No.12678233

>>12668407
While I do not agree with everything on this list, I am encouraged that he did not mention Nick land in the "worth reading" category.
Ahhh, the heated dreams of callow youth. One day he will regret this.

>> No.12678397

How is stoicism for cucks if taoism is for chads. Taoism is just stoicism for gooks

>> No.12678431

>>12674579
t. lookism-coper

>> No.12678459
File: 8 KB, 270x182, guenon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12678459

Not a single philosopher is worth reading if you don't have time to waste.
The only way is René Guénon.

>> No.12678484

>>12678459
op here forgot to add this hack (and all the traditionalists really) to the no discernible talent list will add this to the copypaste thx

>> No.12679406

Bump

>> No.12679472

>>12678484
shove your pasta up your ass and never post it again pseudlord

>> No.12679635
File: 727 KB, 640x1136, 7A5C31E9-A507-4FD0-82D6-6CE115450788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12679635

>>12668407
> doesn’t like Plato

>> No.12679699

>>12678203
What the fuck even are they? Please sparknotes me because Being and Time should be called Wasting Your Time.

>> No.12681125
File: 28 KB, 450x311, 1117792-bigthumbnail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12681125

ITS GO TIME - HOP ABOARD THE S.S. MEME