/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12613636]

Did hegel predicted this outcome in society too?

[Anonymous No.12613647]

>>12613636
>did hegel "predicted"
Learn to fucking read and write.

[Anonymous No.12613649]

sweetie, hegel MADE the society.

[Anonymous No.12613652]

>>12613636
Belle Delphine is objectively better than Hegel intellectually, morally and aesthetically.

[Anonymous No.12613654]

>>12613636
No. But you could always contrive a way to argue this was a foresseable development of history viewed through Hegelian dialectcs. A posteriori model fitting doesn't matter all that much.

Note that this existed already in the time of Hegel, famous demi-mondaines could rake up millions by having sex (or simply dining with) wealthy aristocrats, politicans and industrialists.

[Anonymous No.12613656]

>>12613647
He read too much Hegel.

[Anonymous No.12613660]

>>12613636
Her tongue is a cum pillow.

[Anonymous No.12613667]

The concept of a slave(thirsty betas) acknowledging his submission to his master, e.g in this case, the figure of a 21st century woman, is perfectly explained in the Phenomenology of Spirit section called Of Lordship and Bondage.

[Anonymous No.12613671]

>>12613652
>aesthetically
Doubt

[Anonymous No.12613673]

>>12613652
Based

[Anonymous No.12613697]

Thots are nothing new, but if Hegel were alive today, he'd say things have gone horribly wrong and his predictions failed.

[Anonymous No.12613705]

>>12613697
>if Hegel were alive today,
I rather think he'd be pleasantly surprised.

[Anonymous No.12613711]

>>12613649
that gif only applies to america

[Anonymous No.12613712]

>>12613697
Its like a paradox, this dystopian society gives zero fucks about the individual and yet the value of individual thots skyrocket and keep raising

[Anonymous No.12613714]

>>12613636
God! I want to shit in her mouth.

[Anonymous No.12613722]

>>12613711
there's only two countries in the whole world that isn't owned by america.

[Anonymous No.12613730]

>12613705
No he wouldn't. He believed heterosexuality was the only proper expression of sexuality and that a woman's realm of achievement is properly the domestic sphere

[Anonymous No.12613740]

>>12613722
North Korea and Venezuela

[Anonymous No.12613747]

Hegel never predicted anything, you motherfucking nigger. The future is untold and undetermined.

[Anonymous No.12613751]

>>12613636
Yes

[Anonymous No.12613764]

Schopenhauer is laughing and saying "I told you so!" while looking up at us from Hell.

[Anonymous No.12613768]

>>12613705
No he wouldn't. He believed consumerism should be fought, that heterosexuality was the only proper expression of sexuality and that a woman's realm of achievement is properly the domestic sphere. He would complain that our society is a morally bankrupt matriarchy and that the white race degenerated where it ought to have lead. That entertainment has replaced Christianity (which those who can't appreciate philosophy need).

[Anonymous No.12613772]

>>12613747

[Anonymous No.12613783]

I bet Belle Delphine hates Hegel and only reads Quine and other analytic philosophers.

[Anonymous No.12613785]

>>12613740
north korea and iran. these are the two only countries that are not using SWIFT network.

[Anonymous No.12613798]

>>12613697
If Hegel was a live today he would either be Jean-Marie Le Pen, or he would be a Marxist Communist.

[Anonymous No.12613801]

>mfw I sublated the self-relating relation of the self

[Anonymous No.12613824]

>>12613798
No, he would be considerably to the right of her, more like Paul Gottfried. And Thomas Jefferson (who signed a bill prescribing castration for homosexuals, and went on to support state nullification of Federal Law) would be a supporter of Richard Spencer.

[Anonymous No.12613835]

>>12613824
>right of her

I was talking about Marine Le Pen's father who is already considerably to the right of her.

[Anonymous No.12613842]

>>12613835
And Delphine, where is she on the political spectrum? Is she Alt-Right?

[Anonymous No.12613844]

>>12613842
She's a thot, thots are liberals

[Anonymous No.12613847]

>>12613842
In her interview with the New Yorker she claimed to have "moderate and sensible conservative values"

[Anonymous No.12613854]

>>12613835
Hegel would be advocating a military coup at this point and possibly the extermination or deportation of a lot of people

[Anonymous No.12613856]

>>12613747
Precisley, the owl of Minerva only takes flight at dusk.

[Anonymous No.12613875]

>>12613847
>moderate and sensible conservative values
Lmao.

[Anonymous No.12613877]

>>12613847
Really? I'm even more her fan now.

[Anonymous No.12613879]

>>12613842
She's a red tory

[Anonymous No.12613882]

>>12613847
>she claimed to have "moderate and sensible conservative values"
>posts lewd photos making ahegao faces
Totally not a cognitive dissonance

[Anonymous No.12613890]

>>12613882
He's joking, the New Yorker wouldn't interview her.

[Anonymous No.12613902]

>>12613890
It wouldn't be weird for the sake of views

[Anonymous No.12613905]

>>12613847
>>12613875
>>12613882

it actually makes perfect sense to me. these tradthots and by extension these thot-thots just do whatever they can to pander to the sensibilities of the typical 4chan /pol/ beta. its the exact same way that certain psychopathic dudes will pretend to be a feminist to get pussy, these whores pretend to agree with alt-right ideology for money

[Anonymous No.12613920]

>>12613902
The New Yorker isn't Slate or the Guardian except for being obnoxious liberal

[Anonymous No.12613925]

>>12613877

[Anonymous No.12613930]

>>12613905
Trads on twitter reportrd them to the IRS. They hate them

[Anonymous No.12613940]

>>12613925
Hitler cat looking to the pleb with disdain

[Anonymous No.12613956]

>>12613882
>posts lewd photos making ahegao faces

It is called performance art, you philistine.

[Anonymous No.12613963]

>>12613956
art is not the same as pronography you decadent

[Anonymous No.12614055]

>>12613963
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotic_art

Read the article, ignoramus. You have neither intelligence nor sophistication to understand or appreciate Delphine's art.

[Anonymous No.12614080]

This is much better than Hegel

[Anonymous No.12614085]

>>12614055
Stop thinking with your dick for a goddamn second

[Anonymous No.12614100]

>>12614085
Prove that she is not doing art, uncultured scum.

[Anonymous No.12614109]

>>12613636
It's always been this way. How is this any different than some concubine living like a princess because some cucked king took a liking to her?

[Anonymous No.12614125]

The cultural Marxists and the MSM are harassing her after she revealed that she is a conservative.

[Anonymous No.12614143]

>>12614109
one lucky concubine vs a myriad of thots being adopted by the hivermind of the combined power of all the betas on earth, there's quite a difference

[Anonymous No.12614144]

>>12613768
hegel literally said that the future was with america (philosophy of history) and he saw nations as vehicles of spirit which it shed at appropriate times. in his section on phrenology in the phenomenology he said that the only counterargument strong enough to penetrate the thick skull of a phrenologist was a cane. hegel would not have very much liked your lazy reactionary analysis.

[Anonymous No.12614145]

>>12613712
I think the opposite is the case, egoism is rampant in modern society and the individual is praised constantly over the unit (just look at the modern fascination with not having kids and celebrating materialism instead)

[Anonymous No.12614159]

>>12614080
Why is she so perfect?

[Anonymous No.12614163]

>>12613963
A huge chunk of European art is about displaying nake bodies tho.

[Anonymous No.12614169]

>>12614163
Exactly. The hypocrisy of these postmodernists is repulsive.

[Anonymous No.12614175]

>>12614144
My "analysis" is nothing but direct reference to his Philosophy of Right

[Anonymous No.12614180]

>>12614143
>one lucky concubine
There were hundred of those all over greece. Not sure they were less numerous as a proportion of the population.
The greeks also had antire temples les filled with what were basically slaves-prostitutes.

[Anonymous No.12614201]

>>12613636
Jesus christ, she is at best, a 5/10. Aesthetic standards for women are ridiculously low. Don't be deformed or fat and you can milk money out of literal retards on Patreon.