[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 101 KB, 1694x1226, hmmmmm.jpg_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591085 No.12591085[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is there anything /ourguy/ aka Stefan Molyneux isn't an expert in? what are some books?

>> No.12591090

back to /pol/

>> No.12591092

>>12591085
>what are some books?
I actually don't mind low effort bait threads but this isn't even low-effort, this is no-effort. Here:
>what are some books about supply and demand of controversial products?

>> No.12591097
File: 549 KB, 2048x2023, molyneux.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591097

>Is there anything /ourguy/ aka Stefan Molyneux isn't an expert in?
yes. the word you are looking for is "everything" except saying stupid shit, forming cults, and parting morons from their hard-earned cash

>> No.12591107

>>12591090
>>12591092
>>12591097
not an argument

>> No.12591171

>>12591085
>blacks are also the drug
what did he mean by this?

>> No.12591258

>>12591085
Philosophy. Otherwise he's ok.

>> No.12591268

>>12591085
Apparently he isn't an expert in logic. But i doubt this tweet is real.

>> No.12591292

>>12591268
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1095364866955722752?s=19

>> No.12591299

>>12591171
white people are dependent on the superior black race.

>> No.12591300
File: 43 KB, 444x287, 1471304839469.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591300

Is Molyneux the worst brainlet among all the Twitter/Reddit/Facebook "philosophers"? They're all stupid, of course, but is anyone AS stupid as this guy?

>> No.12591317
File: 161 KB, 422x357, 1527322454168.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591317

>>12591292
Oh my god, he is actually retarded.

>> No.12591328

>>12591090
>>12591097
>>12591268
>>12591300
>>12591317
try to counter him
you can't

>> No.12591350
File: 127 KB, 700x800, there is some fuckery about.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591350

>>12591328
PEOPLE
ARE
NOT
DRUGS
You can't compare selling an inanimate object to selling drugs. In the drug trade only the fucking user is the victim in the transaction. In human trafficking the person who buys another human is also guilty.
That's why traffickers and buyers GO TO JAIL. If you don't realize that one has an actual victim in the dealing then you are an idiot.

>> No.12591352

Moly is kinda cringy, but he has a point.

>> No.12591355

>>12591350
FUCK
You can't compare selling an inanimate object to selling a person*

>> No.12591356

>>12591350
You're my drug, bby ;)
Can't get enough of you <3

>> No.12591363

>>12591350
>In human trafficking the person who buys another human is also guilty.
The buyer of drugs is also guilty.
So yes, you can compare it.

>> No.12591374

>>12591352
No, no he doesn't, he really does not. This is the most inane tweet I've ever read

>> No.12591377

>>12591363
There are changes in law that say that possession of drugs is being lessened. The same can't be said for possession of people.

>> No.12591380

>>12591350
lol so people aren't responsible for purchasing drugs

>> No.12591389

>>12591085
HOLY BASED!

>> No.12591399

>>12591377
>argument from law
Slavery was perfectly legal back in the day.

>> No.12591403

>>12591374
It's about shining some light on the slave economy and history, which still has implications today. If you don't get it you're either autistic or brainwashed.

>> No.12591417

the dealers are clearly the slavetraders, not the slaves. in this particular analogy, the slaves would be the drug. what a confused brainlet.

>> No.12591421

>>12591350
>You can't compare
Clearly we can. No reason not to. This is not sound reasoning:
>THESE ARE MY MORALS
>HOW DARE YOU DISAGREE WITH MY MORAL FAGGING
>I TYPE LIKE THIS TO LET YOU KNOW THAT MY SUBJECTIVE MORALS ARE OBJECTIVELY CORRECT:
>WITH
>BIG
>LETTERS
And no arguments were presented.

>> No.12591427

>>12591417
But everyone is a slave to capitalism.

>> No.12591432

>>12591427
I was thinking about segueing into perverting Molyneux's analogy into an anti-capitalist one. but I dont really care about socialism enough to do it. it certainly fits socialism better than what molyneux is trying to say.

isn't it funny when Kanye says it better than a so-called "philosopher"? slavery was a choice, just ask the Haitians.

>> No.12591470
File: 708 KB, 408x303, 1511945029450.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591470

>>12591432
The thought of Molyneux being considered a "philosopher" is deeply depressing to me. Is this what we've come to in the West?

>> No.12591606

>>12591470
Well, he probably did study some philosophy at some point, but labels by themselves are meaningless anyway.

>> No.12591636

>>12591085

This is so stupid. Slavery was practiced by everyone, everywhere, always, except for a select few societies that forbade it. Why is there even a discussion about who to "blame" for it?

>> No.12591661
File: 179 KB, 1300x953, christians-on-a-pilgrimage-carrying-a-cross-in-rememberance-of-slavery-A770GN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12591661

>>12591636
>Slavery was practiced by everyone, everywhere, always
Not many people know that.
The only ones feeling guilty about it are whites.

>> No.12591671

>>12591661
I could break outta those cuffs...