[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 280 KB, 400x300, Kant_Destroyer.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12514581 No.12514581 [Reply] [Original]

If you were god where would you put kant, in heaven or hell?

>> No.12514589

Seated at my left hand.

>> No.12514600

depends on the god. most abrahamic religions would probably send him to heaven simply because he never ever masturbated. ever.

>> No.12514611

>>12514600
Buddhism and ascetic Christianity are the only two religions that place explicit reservations against the practice.
It's not because SKY MAN SAYS ITS BAD, brainlet.

>> No.12514660

He's ugly so he goes to hell. Categorical imperative would be against offending people in heaven by forcing them to gaze upon Kant's ugliness

>> No.12514667

>>12514660
If youre god why did you made him ugly then just so could send him to hell?

>> No.12514683

>>12514667
Outkanted

>> No.12514720

>>12514667
Look into Calvinism

>> No.12514780

>>12514720
I just read the wiki article and it sounds like alot of bullshit
>gods only saves the ones he wants to save
Whats the fucking point of being here then he already knows who's gonna save and doom, are we here just to prove the ones who he did choose to save is that the fate of the doomed ones?
If thats true then hes the incarnation of evil and can go suck a bunch of dicks

>do not question god because you cant understand his way
Well then why are we here discussing anything just fucking close this place and every place of discussion, lets just mindlessly follow that jewish book

>> No.12514828

>>12514581
Probably heaven, a bit racist but made great contributions to philosophy.

>> No.12514848

>>12514780
We will never understand why Eliott Rodgers spared those he did, will we?

>> No.12514850

>>12514780
>I just read the wiki article
/lit/, the place for intellectual philosophers

>> No.12514915

>>12514667
>>12514660
>implying we won't all be remade in perfection
The choir will be a splendid and glorious sight, perfect and awesome and worthy of praising His name for all time to come

>> No.12514927

>>12514915
God I wish this will become me

(not even Christian or meming)

>> No.12514942

>>12514660
the categorical imperative would be against you using Kant as a means to improve others level of offence

>> No.12514943
File: 29 KB, 400x400, YRVNBasm_400x400[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12514943

>>12514927
All you have to do is heed His call, friend.

>> No.12514959

>>12514581
Definitely in judeo-christian heaven where his pedophilic physiognomy would be welcomed with open arms by Jews

>> No.12515024

>>12514943
I love this image. I’d like to imagine dying and then just chatting with Jesus as we walked together.

I wonder what kind of fish they’d have in the pond.

>> No.12515050

>>12514943
such a comfy picture. thanks apu

>> No.12515100

>>12514581

He's too dim for Heaven. It would scare him.

>> No.12516764

>>12514581
I Kant decide.

>> No.12516773

>>12514581
I'd put him in the rape zone.

>> No.12516821

>>12514581
I'd retire and put him in my place