BRONZE AGE MINDSET

[Anonymous No.12469527]

Thoughts on this? Is the reading worth it? I feel like reading it but can't find a copy of it anywhere.

[Anonymous No.12469542]

>Look, discord mommy, posted it again.
Your book is meme shit, BAM.

[Anonymous No.12469545]

no. yes. it's at the usual places, and you can also buy it.

[Anonymous No.12469553]

>>12469527
I'm thinking about getting this for my brothers bday. its like a tongue in cheek pseudo philosophy humor book or something right

[Anonymous No.12469570]

>>12469542
?

>>12469545
Too expensive on Amazon for me

>>12469553
I don't know much about it other than what I read on /pol/

[Anonymous No.12469748]

>>12469570
>Too expensive on Amazon for me
libgen
b-ok

[Anonymous No.12469774]

>>12469553
It's pretty damned funny, with some genuine cutting insight into the foibles of modern liberal capitalism.

[Anonymous No.12470057]

I might read it this weekend op, as a comedy of course

[Anonymous No.12470387]

It's funny and meme-y, but legitimately insightful at some points. The points it makes at the beginning about animal "epistemology" seem fascinating to me, albeit I'm a brainlet and the only books on that kind of stuff I've ever read are The Genius of Birds and Maeterlinck's books on ants and bees.

[Anonymous No.12470447]

This was posted yesterday and you started a new one because of all the negative feedback.
Same as last time, just you brought more samefags. Your book sucks and no amount of shilling will change that.

[Anonymous No.12470474]

>>12470447
I literally found out about this motherfucking book today. I don't give a shit whether you think I am the faggot who wrote it, I just wanted an opinion.

[Anonymous No.12470507]

>>12470474
Okay, well now you know it's meme garbage that gets shilled here.

[Anonymous No.12470527]

>>12469553
>>12469774
>>12470387
This shit is mostly right. Don't take it seriously and you'll be entertained , but it does have a handful of interesting ideas in it. It's short and easy to read, no reason not to if that's what you're looking for.

[Anonymous No.12470540]

>>12470527
This many samefags to shill a book about post-Chad nihilism...
Why do you care so much?

[Anonymous No.12470558]

>>12470540
Dude why do YOU care so much?

[Anonymous No.12470592]

>>12469527
It's either written by a non-anglophone or it is seriously lacking revision.

[Anonymous No.12470629]

>>12470558
I never claimed to be a chad nihilist, so the question doesn't work when turned around.
How are you so stupid? You should learn basic logic before writing your next meme book.

[Anonymous No.12470633]

Read the first 20 or so paragraphs of it. I'm not a very sophisticated reader but here's my take.

Nothing significant or interesting. Writing style shows it's an individual who seemingly speaks English as a second language and shit posts. Sometimes uses their own terms and slang which adds nothing of value to the writing imo. No new ideas presented really, some stuff like "Darwin isn't completely correct, I think he's wrong in this abstract and non specific way blah blah", and I didn't agree with or understand his rationale or his logic as to how he came to his ideas. One part was like "yo man i was drunk as shit this one time and it was an interesting night, blah blah blah, how interesting it is to think about things from other peoples perspectives woah dude haha!" or some shit like that. Or he'll make a sweeping generalization about left wing politics with no argument made supporting his opinion. I don't know, I can't really remember that much, it was just unremarkable to me as a work that my memory doesn't give any significance or importance to it so my neurons have others things to prioritize. Honestly seems like a pile of shit clothed in references of some known past intellectual thinkers and some obscure ones. I assume he's just setting up the rest of the book in the beginning, but I just can't be bothered to continue wasting my time with this one. I mean I'll give it a chance if someone can make a solid argument for it, but otherwise it's a nope from me.

[Anonymous No.12470676]

>>12470633
>i read the first 20 paragraphs
>therefore im entitled to write a blog about it on 4channel
bugman hueman

[Anonymous No.12470680]

>>12470629
I never said you were a chad nihilist - talk about being stupid.

Why are you so obsessed with debunking a text which you claim is fake and shit? Has the author been a bully to you during HS? I won't answer your posts from now on. Please move on with your life.

[Anonymous No.12470681]

>everyone saying to read it as a comedy
>relax!
>don’t take it too seriously
Y I K E S
the mammies have truly won

[Anonymous No.12470700]

>>12470676
>stating "i read the first 20 paragraphs"
>you can clearly infer from that that my opinion is based on limited knowledge of the book and only pertains to what little of it I have read

>"nah fuck that I'm gonna make a joke about an individual just trying to answer OPs question by referencing the lame ass terminology from the book kek"

[Anonymous No.12470708]

>>12470680
HUGE YIIIIKKKKESS!

[Anonymous No.12470720]

>>12469527
>Yeah, I enjoyed it a lot.
>You can download it on libgen, or support the author through Amazon.
>Godspeed, bro.

[Anonymous No.12470769]

>>12470629
>>12470708
>obsessively shill against a literal meme book
>cant follow a basic conversation without sperging out
>doesnt understand how the ip counter works
>redit posting

[Anonymous No.12470775]

>>12470769
the mammies are trying really really hard to put a lid on this movement before they lose control of the situation

[Anonymous No.12470779]

>>12470775
>mammies
the what?

[Anonymous No.12470906]

Reading it. BAP went from denying the value of the principles of Darwinism to saying hormones are the key for understanding life. Does it get any better?

[Anonymous No.12470926]

virgin ooga booga mindset vs Chad MAGA Mindset

[Anonymous No.12470994]

>>12470769
Imagine being this stupid.
And what movement? You guys actually have Dick Walks?

[Anonymous No.12471083]

>>12470769
>>redit posting
>https://www.reddit.com/r/sorceryofthespectacle/comments/8qnrvc/beach_nietzsche_a_review_of_bronze_age_mindset/
>countless other reddit pages
WHOOPS AND YIKES

[Anonymous No.12471090]

>>12471083
doesnt really count that board has under 10k people in it
go on the reddit main page to see what 'redditposting' means

[Anonymous No.12471157]

This book triggers leftycuck bugman faggots so hard. I love it

[Anonymous No.12471164]

>>12471157

[Anonymous No.12471170]

>>12471157
>>12470769
>numbers didn't rise with these posts
What did they mean by this?

[Anonymous No.12471179]

[Anonymous No.12471180]

>>12471164
>>12471170
case in point

[Anonymous No.12471188]

>>12471179
based

[Anonymous No.12471196]

Such a Chad he has to pay a 6/10 to model his meme book.

[Anonymous No.12471209]

>>12470633
The actual interesting part of the book is the middle bit, skip a few pages if you really can't be bothered reading the beginning.

>>12470906
At what point does he deny the principles of Darwinism? He mostly just has a problem with the methodology and mindset of modern researchers in the field. He praises Darwin at some points.

[Anonymous No.12471342]

[Anonymous No.12471481]

>>12471170
I posted this
>>12470527
and then I replied back to the triggered samefagging reditfag who's shilling against this meme fucking twitter book here >>12470769

>>12470994
>>12471083
did the sperg start using a bot?

[Anonymous No.12472606]

>>12471481
This is powerful.

[Anonymous No.12473055]

Amazing book. He is the Nietzsche of our time. The GigaChad Ubermensch is coming.

[Anonymous No.12473070]

>huehue imma call them mammies that will show them bet those dorks don't even know about the supercool secret twitterclique treehouse im a part of

[Anonymous No.12473086]

>>12469527
It's good, I bought it off Amazon.

Great book, lots of nuggets of genius observation

[Anonymous No.12473089]

>>12471179
Hhhm, I wonder how he will choose the best studs. Really makes me think.

[Anonymous No.12473268]

>>12473070
Fuck off incel.

[Anonymous No.12474927]

bump

[Anonymous No.12474947]

All the basedboys here would hate it. Book not for virgins.

[Anonymous No.12475077]

>>12470592
The caveman style writing is intentional--it works well on his twitter, but not the best choice for extended works.

[Anonymous No.12475088]

>>12470994
We're not men's rights advocates, more Third Positionists.

[Anonymous No.12475110]

Number of posters still hasn't changed.
Incredible levels of shilling. Must be depressing for a Chad to have to stoop so low.

[Anonymous No.12475459]

>>12475110
There was a ton of shilling right when it came out but then it disappeared. This last week there's always been at least one thread up full of shilling. I guess BAP's harem of faggots are getting paid in cummies in exchange for shilling

[Anonymous No.12475495]

its unfunny.

[Anonymous No.12475656]

VICTORY TO THE GODS

[Anonymous No.12475728]

>>12469527

Plebfeed at worst, somewhat funny satire at best.
Much like this board.

[Anonymous No.12475745]

>>12475459

Sounds similar to icycalm and his shitty orgy.
Is it just that faggots will jump on the dick of anyone who writes in a style even somewhat reminiscent of Nietzsche?

[Anonymous No.12475761]

>>12475459
>>12475745
have you considered maybe that the book is good?

[Anonymous No.12475793]

>>12475761

No, I haven't. I'm nearly done with the western canon, and I have read widely in contemporary literature. One trend I've noticed is that the last great literature was written in the 1890's, and that there hasn't been any good literature for the past 40 years. Great literature pretty much died with Tolstoy. Some of the Germans have come close since, but only close.

Tell me, why is it good?

[Anonymous No.12475873]

>>12475793
>Tell me, why is it good?
If someone posted about War & Peace and said "Tell me, why is it good?", what would you say to them? You'd tell them to go read it, right? Honestly, put yourself in my shoes here.

[Anonymous No.12475892]

>>12475873
That's not even a fair comparison, pretend someone asked you about The Death of Ivan Ilyich. 'Bout the same length as BAM

[Anonymous No.12476604]

>>12475459
I remember that. It was really bad.

[Anonymous No.12477204]

The author is clearly a raging homo. Is it someone from Donovan's circle?

[Anonymous No.12477405]

Can anyone provide any interesting insights from the book or is everyone going to continue being vague in order to shill it?

[Anonymous No.12477422]

There are now BAP clones around

Doonvorcannon has written a shitty BAP Book ripoff, and I understand Mike Ma is coming out with something soon

[Anonymous No.12477443]

>>12477405
Its supposed to get you thinking in a certain way, not give you some new information as such

Basically BAP is arguing something similar to Uncle Ted that modern society has robbed people of purpose. BAPs solution to this is to cultivate the mindset of classical heroes, so instead of wanting to live an okay life within the bounds of social norms, you want to attain the kind of greatness that was valued in that era.

For all its faults, its supposed to jolt you out of the bugman mindset and get you working towards something higher, in my opinion it's effective in that regard

[Anonymous No.12478263]

>>12477443
>heroism
>instagram faggotry
Fuck metamodernist 'Chads'. Worse than feminists.