[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 492 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_2019-01-20-11-17-44-52.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12441710 No.12441710 [Reply] [Original]

>The absolute state of this board

>> No.12441721

>>12441710
CHARGE YOUR FUCKING PHONE

>> No.12441733

this board is actually one of the most woman-free on the site and i take it so for granted that i forget to stop and be grateful for it.

women are either mocked for (generally) being low-talent retards when it comes to literature, philosophy, or thinking in general, or they're objectified and talked about, but never actually present. when they do rarely post, /lit/ is bizarrely good at identifying their various pathologies and running them off if necessary. in the rare cases where female posters are inoffensive, /lit/ usually ignores them or posts a joke or two and lets them be.

thank you /lit/ for keeping at least a few No Girls Allowed spaces alive in this nightmare society where every space must be feminized and filled with dilettante socialite whores.

>> No.12441760

>>12441733
Shut up Belinda
>>12441710
You told us to stop LARPing as Christcucks and greekaboos and poets so we're trying LARPing as something straight. We thought you'd be happy, but you're never fucking satisfied are you.

>> No.12441761

Women are 50% of the world and vary as much as men do. That's all I need to say.

>> No.12441762

>>12441733
>Be grateful we never shut up about music

>> No.12441845

>>12441761
No, they vary less than men do. Thats why there are more males who achieve greatness and more homeless male drug addicts.

>> No.12442261

>>12441710
I wonder to what extent those posters and the alt-right frog posters are one and the same.

>> No.12442286

>>12441733
There are better posters than you on /lit/ who are female. You type like a newfag trying to fit in.

>> No.12442289

>>12441721
No

>> No.12442599

>>12441733
>lit/ is bizarrely good at identifying their various pathologies
I pretend to be a chick all the time (very easy to do without even having to identify yourself as such) and its hilarious watching the incels try to explain the psychology of women based on my posts

>> No.12442844

>>12441733
You must be new. This board has always had a lot of female posters, though probably less since /pol/ started colonising

>> No.12442854

>>12441710
>Mobilefag
>Doesn't even use an app, just uses the terrible mobile site
You're part of the problem

>> No.12442860
File: 282 KB, 425x583, imgs63550-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12442860

Shit thread.
Post INTP books.

>> No.12442877

>>12441710
OH SHIT NIGGER YOUR PHONE'S GONNA DIE!!

>> No.12443016
File: 2 KB, 106x103, 1539014435446s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12443016

>>12441733

>> No.12443265

>>12441733
But /lit/ loves Dickinson, Woolf, Eliot and O'Connor, and Joanna Newsom seems to be /lit/'s favourite lyricist. Also since your post is only talking about how people don't post about women on /lit/ and so includes negative posting, what about all the shitposting about Rupi Kaur, JK Rowling and that Asian woman saying you only need 30 books

>> No.12443339

>>12441710
Women worshipping and other pro-women posting seems to have had an upsurge recently. It's about fucking time.
>>12441733
Girls have always been talked about, and I'm pretty sure there are a few female posters on this board.

>> No.12443378

>>12443265
Joni Mitchell is alright too.

>> No.12443392

>>12443265
We like Aisha bint Abi Bakr too.