Karl Jung- a fucking pseud

[Anonymous No.12424174]

Is this guy for real?

I'm about 40 pages into this book, and this is straight up retarded. A total fucking mystical LARP. This is the guy that Peterstein bases his work on?

This guy is a joke, and it makes Peterstein look like an even bigger joke

[Anonymous No.12424178]

K. Thanks for letting us know.

[Anonymous No.12424187]

>>12424174
Peterson was always a Joke

[Anonymous No.12424189]

>>12413114

[Anonymous No.12424191]

>>12424174
He said that Hitler was the incarnation of Odin if you're interested.

[Anonymous No.12424197]

>>12424187
Peterstein talks like Jung is the most profound writer who ever lived

The guy is like a mystical hocus pocus goof. Talking about the meta-meaning of his patient's dreams.

He says he had a patient who said he had a dream about a dirty woman screaming in his face, so he deducted that the dream was actually about his patient's feminine subconcious shadow that was lurking within him.

[Anonymous No.12424203]

>>12424197
If you don't understand Jung you're the biggest pseud

[Anonymous No.12424256]

>>12424174

Check this out:

>>12407382

[Anonymous No.12424265]

>>12424256
Jordan Peterson is not a philosopher and he is not a scientist in the humanities or social science. Most of the things he says which sound "philosophical" are in the field of analytical psychology (Jungian psychology).
But then, he would be uncovered as a quacksalver, too.
1. Jungian psychology is highly criticized. (Personally, I study Jungian psychology and support Jung's theories.)
2. Which brings me to the second point: Peterson doesn't apply Jungian psychology orderly. He uses Jungs theory to justify most of what he says but he ignores the part of Jungian psychology that wouldn't fit in his world view. For example, in Jungian psychology the political right and left are the representation of equal forces in the collective unconscious. Fighting against the SJW is illogical according to Jungian psychology. Now, you could argue that he developed Jungian psychology but he didn't. He doesn't explain the significant meanderings.
3.He himself said that he is captured by an archetype. In Jungian psychology, it means that he doesn't make an inner conflict conscious and projects it onto something in the outer world. (Obviously, it's his work.) He plays the archetype of the father and hero and attracts people, who unconsciously need to compensate this archetype.

https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/615e3z/i_am_dr_jordan_b_peterson_u_of_t_professor/dfby6as/
Jordan Peterson about the hero archetype:
> My wife keeps me from identifying too much with the archetype :)

https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/7ttg88/the_archetypal_father_signed_my_atlas/
He signed as the "archetypal father".

Also: Even though, Jungian psychology is the foundation of his work, he never went through a Jungian therapy or has an education in Jungian psychology.

[Anonymous No.12424302]

>>12424197
u do know this book is just a brief summary of his ideas. its really only ment to be red if u want to know what sort of work Jung was doing. If u want to critizise him first read the hole book first. second get something heavier then a introductory book.

[Anonymous No.12424322]

>>12424197
>The guy is like a mystical hocus pocus goof.
Imagine being a hocus pocus goof.

Do you think there is an archetype of ugliness, intentional misunderstanding and evil that leftists and jews feed and breed?

[Anonymous No.12424385]

>>12424174
Jung is actually based, but Wash Your Penis doesnt understands him

[Anonymous No.12424392]

>>12424302
>>12424322
>>12424385
Alright you guys are making me think again about him

[Anonymous No.12424397]

Freud>Jung

[Anonymous No.12424402]

>>12424397
Jung is better, even if it's only by a margin the length of his foreskin.

[Anonymous No.12424411]

>>12424322
It's the jew archetype
>>12424397
Cringe

[Anonymous No.12424571]

>>12424174
Man and his Symbols is like Astrophysics for people in a hurry. It doesn't explain how these conclusions were derived, it just paints a colorful sorta poetic sketch of what the theories are. There's not enough detail to critique the theories from it, you're have to check out his case studies

[Anonymous No.12424780]

>>12424265
this

[Anonymous No.12424803]

Jung is sun worship for agnostic academics

[Anonymous No.12424806]

Jung is probably one of the brightest minds of the 20th century, that you are so deep into your empiricist hole that cant even see the light of the sun anymore is not his fault.

[Anonymous No.12424831]

>>12424806
What did Jung discover that wasn't known 2000 years ago?

[Anonymous No.12424836]

>>12424397
One day I'm gonna catch a freudfag and beat the life out of him

[Anonymous No.12424910]

Jung is Freud for hippies

[Anonymous No.12424934]

>fedora cope thread