/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12414743]

Name a more objective moral principle than antinatalism.

[Anonymous No.12414772]

Life is neither valuable nor valueless, it's the field of value itself, Montaigne blew anti-natalism the fuck out just writing letters on the shitter, God I'm so sick of this brainlet philosophy

[Anonymous No.12414780]

>>12414743
Veganism

[Anonymous No.12414792]

>>12414743
Self preservation of the ego, and destroying your captors by any means necessary.

[Anonymous No.12414794]

>>12414743
Pooping in the bathtub

[Anonymous No.12414808]

>>12414743
Antintalism is utopia.
Utopia is the an inexistent place/condition by definition.
Harm and Benefit are equally irrelevant .
Don't Demonize Nature.

[Anonymous No.12414935]

>>12414772
How does someone debunk a philosophy before it even formally exists?

[Anonymous No.12414961]

>>12414743
Wow! Table and formulae instead of sentences. Must be very true and deep.

[Anonymous No.12414973]

>>12414743
antisemitism.

[Anonymous No.12414979]

>>12414743
Superexistence. It doesn't care about harm or or benefit, it has its own thing worth infinite benefits.

[Anonymous No.12414991]

>>12414961
>implying "depth" isn't just an excuse to obscure simple truths that anyone can understand.

[Anonymous No.12416561]

>Absence of benifit
>Existance: Y

WRONG.

[Anonymous No.12417521]

lol if your people stop having kids then my people will just exploit you and your land in order to serve our own interests :^)

[Anonymous No.12417528]

>>12414743
>Existence
>-1
??

[Anonymous No.12417664]

>>12414743
>implying the quantity attributed to the presence of harm is equal to that attributed to the presence of benefit
How do you quantify suffering?
How do you quantify benefit?
The presence of each is going to vary in different amounts for every person, so its very arbitrary to say all of those are equal to each other

[Kantians, rise up No.12417772]

The categorical imperative which is derived from subjective principles of action and manifesting them as universal practical laws through the means of practical reason, which is pure reason applied to action.

[Anonymous No.12417789]

>>12414743
Oh look, it’s another episode of Idiots Argue about Philosophy.

Instead, how about you faggots try to propose a topic that can be engaged in instead of these retarded posts which offer no context, argument, description, or practical applications to morality. I’m not you, you filthy swine. I don’t know what made you think that nor does anyone else, hence the shit quality of the thread.