[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 51 KB, 473x595, lexi-mendi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12401778 No.12401778 [Reply] [Original]

Is may diary desu a good book or is it a meme?

>> No.12401793
File: 223 KB, 500x414, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12401793

>>12401778

>> No.12401804

>>12401793
Omg stretchmarks are so disgusting
Get out you incel

>> No.12401812

>>12401793
Get your test checked

>> No.12401831
File: 107 KB, 331x400, 400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12401831

>>12401804
You're the one who seems kinda mad..
Maybe if you had more sex you wouldn't be whiteknighting instathots on 4chan??

>> No.12401840

Can anyone reply, I'm genuinely intrigued

>> No.12401843

>>12401831
Not everyone is perfect. I bet if you posted your picture or a picture or your girlfriend here everyone would be laughing. Stop trying to police everyone for not being a 10/10 with not a single unattractive thing about them.

>> No.12401852

>>12401843
>Stop trying to police everyone for not being a 10/10 with not a single unattractive thing about them.
"No"

>> No.12401854

>>12401778
Still attractive

Of course it's a meme.
I am working on a journal format story, not my diary, but just a sort of practice piece

>> No.12401864
File: 62 KB, 1855x651, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12401864

>>12401804
>>12401812
>>12401843
How inspiring :)

>> No.12401865

>>12401843
Women have literally one job in this life, which is to be attractive. When they fail at it, they're worse than dogs.

>> No.12401878

>>12401865
Do you have a source for why this is objectively true or is this just your personal opinion which we can all ignore?

>> No.12401880

>>12401878
>trying this hard in a shitpost thread
just stop lol

>> No.12401887

>>12401880
Ill take that as an admittance of defeat. We win stretchmark gang

>> No.12401897
File: 16 KB, 319x319, 1495772736488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12401897

>>12401887
>look guys, am I fitting in yet????
Come on, pal.

>> No.12401900
File: 88 KB, 960x621, 34634634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12401900

>not wholeheartedly loving someone down to their stretchmarks and bodily fluids

>> No.12401934

Stop pretending like this girl is unattractive. She is a 7.5 without stretchmarks and a 7 with them.

>> No.12401945

she has the face of a five year old

>> No.12401954

would

>> No.12401967

What is wrong with stretch marks? They just look wavy

>> No.12401972

>>12401967
THEY'RE NOT STRETCH MARKS THEY'RE HER TIGER STRIPES OKAY, RAWR XD

>> No.12402010

>>12401972
Making fun of a woman who likes her own body
And yet you probably hate yours
Punk

>> No.12402026

>>12402010
i fukt you're mom.... nigger!

>> No.12402039

>>12401972
They don't look that bad. Why is it such a big deal?

>> No.12402066

>>12402026
incel...

>> No.12402089

>>12402039
>Why is it such a big deal?
why are you asking me? I didn't write an article about it

>> No.12402095
File: 869 KB, 2125x1459, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12402095

>>12402039
>>12402089
forgot piccy!

>> No.12402117

>>12402095
>>12402089
It's because of all the people making a big deal out of nothing. No one is the Platonic ideal of beauty

>> No.12402119
File: 66 KB, 824x1430, rycaosxuraz11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12402119

>>12402066
I found this pic of you lmao

>> No.12402313
File: 11 KB, 263x292, smiling-jesus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12402313

>>12401900
>not wholeheartedly loving people down to their true identity thus rebuking their bodies and personae

>> No.12402317

>>12401843
Imagine being this much of a faggot

>> No.12402327

>>12402313
Imagine being this based

>> No.12402409

>>12402313
Bodies are part of their true identity, dumbfuck.
If you actually read your own texts instead of larping you'd know that you are supposedly going to be getting a new one in the Coming Age.

>> No.12402474

>>12402317
Im not the one denying the the lady in the photo is attractive.

>> No.12402476
File: 55 KB, 362x479, mongoose.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12402476

>>12402409
>part of their true identity
>getting a new one

>> No.12402479

>>12402119
Not an argument. Jesus christ this isn't primary school.

>> No.12402504
File: 153 KB, 860x1390, slavoj-zizek-E01FC8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12402504

"Recall the old Catholic strategy to guard men against the temptation of the flesh: when you see in front of you a voluptuous feminine body, imagine how it will look in a couple of decades - the dried skin, sagging breasts... (Or, even better, imagine what lurks now already beneath the skin: raw flesh and bones, inner fluids, half-digested food and excrements...) Far from enacting a return to the Real destined to break the imaginary spell of the body, such a procedure equals the escape from the Real, the Real announcing itself in the seductive appearance of the naked body. That is to say, in the opposition between the spectral appearance of the sexualized body and the repulsive body in decay, it is the spectral appearance with is the Real, and the decaying body which is reality - we take recourse to the decaying body in order to avoid the deadly fascination of the Real which threatens to draw us into its vortex of jouissance.

A "raw" Platonism would have claimed here that only the beautiful body fully materializes the Idea, and that a body in its material decay simply falls of from its Idea, is no longer its faithful copy. From a Deleuzian (and, here, Lacanian) view, on the contrary, the specter that attracts us is the Idea of the body as Real. This body is not the body in reality, but the virtual body in Deleuze's sense of the term: the incorporeal/immaterial body of pure intensities.

Deleuze's most radical anti-Hegelian argument concerns pure difference: Hegel is unable to think pure difference which is outside the horizon of identity/contradiction; Hegel conceives a radicalized difference as contradiction which, then, through its dialectical resolution, is again subsumed under identity. (Here, Deleuze is also opposed to Derrida who, from his perspective, remains caught within the vicious cycle of contradiction/identity, merely postponing resolution indefinitely.) And insofar as Hegel is the philosopher of actuality/actualization, insofar as, for him, the "truth" of a potentiality is revealed in its actualization, Hegel's inability to think pure difference equals his inability to think the virtual in its proper dimension, as a possibility which already qua possibility possesses its own reality: pure difference is not actual, it does not concern different actual properties of a thing or among things, its status is purely virtual, it is a difference which takes place at its purest precisely when nothing changes in actuality, when, in actuality, the SAME thing repeats itself. - Effectively, it may appear that it is only Deleuze who formulates the truly post-Hegelian program of thinking difference: the Derridean "opening" which emphasizes the endless difference, the dissemination that cannot ever be sublated/reappropriated, etc., remains within the Hegelian framework, merely "opening" it up..." and so on and so forth

>> No.12402708

>>12402504
What book is this from? The last paragraph is difficult, but I'm interested

>> No.12402757

>>12402313
So based

>> No.12402774

>>12402504

obviously he hasn't seen that type of hentai where the insides are see through

>> No.12403164

>>12401843
t. woman

>> No.12403173

>>12401843
>a picture of your girlfriend
how fucking optimistic are you

>> No.12403180

>>12401778
No it isnt, and you should read mine desu

>> No.12403185

>>12401865
What’s so bad about dogs dude?

>> No.12403222

>>12402708
Not sure if it's from a specific book or is just an article wrote but I got it from here.

http://www.lacan.com/zizplato.htm

>> No.12403232

>>12401865
That's just as bad and incorrect as claiming men are literally just servants to keep women happy.