/art/

[Anonymous No.12397704]

Fuck /his/ everything we needed was on old /lit/
I miss /art/ threads and there's nothing humanities on /his/ at all so here we go. Post good shit. Mods pls no delet

[Anonymous No.12397706]

>>12397704

[Anonymous No.12397710]

>>12397706
Bohemia is just inferior Moravia

[Anonymous No.12397711]

>>12397706

[Anonymous No.12397715]

>>12397711

[Anonymous No.12397718]

I’m relatively new to actively seeking out art that I like and I’ve found that Impressionism is one of my favorite styles. Is Impressionism normalfag level?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397724]

Last one I saw was >>12337042
Generally nice threads (Just as long as the Scruton fags keep the fuck away)

[Anonymous No.12397728]

>>12397715

[Anonymous No.12397729]

One of my favorite Van Gogh pieces

[Anonymous No.12397730]

>>12397718
Yes it's basically the first style anyone likes when getting into art. Same with Neoclassicism and Pre-Raphaelites... just the 19th century in general.

[Anonymous No.12397736]

[Anonymous No.12397738]

>>12397718

yes it is but as long as you take a serious interest and learn its history, you're fine.

I supphttps://boards.4channel.org/lit/catalogort any art/history thread on lit but I've only got 1.5 hands to type with for a few mins. I really really like art books and live close to a very large world-class museum.

[Anonymous No.12397739]

>>12397718
Follow your heart. Don't let fear of other people's opinions dictate what you enjoy

[Anonymous No.12397748]

>>12397724

go the fuck away.

[Anonymous No.12397750]

>>12397718
Yes but that’s alright my man, it’s still good.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397755]

>>12397730
For me it was sculptures, much later Art Nouveau

[Anonymous No.12397759]

>>12397704
why can't we do both /art/ and /lit/?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397763]

[Anonymous No.12397765]

[Anonymous No.12397768]

>>12397755

go the fuck away.

[Anonymous No.12397775]

>>12397704
How do I get into art as a STEM fag? Is there a good art history primer book or something for plebs like me?

[Anonymous No.12397781]

>>12397730
>>12397738
>>12397739
Any suggestions for art that might help me advance my tastes a little. I love impressionism, but I don’t want to only appreciate it when there’s a whole other world of art out there. Kind of like when I was 14 and all I listened to was classic rock and didn’t know how much other great stuff I was missing out on

[Anonymous No.12397788]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397793]

[Anonymous No.12397795]

>>12397750
Meant to include you here >>12397781

[Anonymous No.12397797]

>>12397775
>>12397781
desu these types of threads and visiting art museums have done the most for helping me find stuff I like. Still know barely anything though desu.

[Anonymous No.12397799]

No idea what this is about (I have a few guesses), but I just think it's so hauntingly beautiful. Those eyes man.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397801]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397807]

[Anonymous No.12397812]

>>12397775
>>12397781
>>12397797
Oh, also check out Khan Academy's course on art history. What I've seen of it is pretty fantastic.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397813]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397817]

[Anonymous No.12397821]

>>12397718
>>12397781
It's alright, but it just happens that Manet happens to be one of my favorite artists and his work is the precursor to, but not quite, impressionism. Here's one of his best works and you can clearly tell it heavily leans toward impressionism.

I much prefer the modernist era paintings that come after though. I used to be of the opinion of Edvard Munch on impressionism is that it's at the end of the day realism but painted with some tricks with light and doesn't express the essence of what lies underneath. That's the reason why post-impressionism was just the logical step forward to further abstraction and less reliance on the forms in nature. That's alright though, there is still something fundamentally aesthetic about impressionism that's just missing when you start to mess with the colors like the Fauvists.

For a recommendation, look up the Symbolists (stuff like in the OP) and people like Gustav Klimt and the art-nouveau. They are very connected to the era of what we considered the "modern" art, basically just reality being abstracted. Also follow the German art movements turning up at the beginning of the 20th century like Die Brucke and Der Blaue Reiter movement as they take a lot of inspiration from post-impressionism and Cubism, and really the Germans I think are some of the best representations of general culture in the 20th century. The French branched off to the Dada and Surrealism due to innovations in photography and film and that was basically the end of that for painted art for them it seemed as they leaned heavily to post-modernism due to one culprit. Shame too, they could have taken a cue from the Italians

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397828]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397836]

[Anonymous No.12397839]

[Anonymous No.12397847]

>>12397718
Its peak midwit and low visual spatial reasoning, does not challenge one’s understanding of color theory or perspective and generally hinges on emotional rather than abstract intellectual engagement with the piece. Is perfect for the ennui and dour but outwardly, performatively sociable metropolitan-suburban human. Guaranteed correlation between preference for 21st century city life and impressionism.

[Anonymous No.12397850]

>>12397781
Read Marinetti's Manifesto of Futurism published in 1909. A very forceful piece of writing and literature in itself. Here's a very interesting example painted in fucking 1912 where they clearly embrace the long-exposure and possibility of movement represented by upcoming technology. Even better is the rest of Balla's art basically looks nothing like this and he's basically a trove of art history for the time in his paintings alone

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397851]

>>12397828
Had no idea how low quality that was :/

[Anonymous No.12397867]

>>12397781
Having an advanced taste to my mind is knowing what you value in art and why, which means reading about art you don't like the look of as well. An understanding of art in a holistic sense. You might find you stop having a favourite style at all.

[Anonymous No.12397868]

[Anonymous No.12397880]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397884]

[Anonymous No.12397903]

[Anonymous No.12397905]

[Anonymous No.12397944]

Does anyone on this board know anything about the contemporary art scene?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397945]

[Anonymous No.12397948]

[Anonymous No.12397955]

>>12397821
Forgot to mention that too, cubism is one of my favorites as well. Anything like that?

[Anonymous No.12397957]

Wow a good thread

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12397958]

>>12397944
Which branch/style?

[Anonymous No.12397967]

[Anonymous No.12397969]

>>12397847
I don’t live in a city, and I’m not a midwit either (144 tested IQ). Why are you being so rude? I openly expressed that I’m new at art and have to develop my tastes.

[Anonymous No.12397977]

>>12397958
I don't know, anything

[Anonymous No.12397978]

>>12397850
Thank you

[Anonymous No.12397981]

>>12397944
Postcontemporary is the hot shit right now.

[Anonymous No.12397994]

>>12397981
I think this is a sarcastic comment

[Anonymous No.12398001]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398002]

>>12397977
You ever see one of those Juxtazop magazines?
Spectrum book series with all the sci-fi/fantasy cover paintings?

[Anonymous No.12398009]

[Anonymous No.12398019]

[Anonymous No.12398021]

>>12397880
More

[Anonymous No.12398023]

[Anonymous No.12398024]

>>12397969
>144 tested IQ
online test don't count anon
t. 145 IQ tested by psychologist

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398030]

>>12398021

[Anonymous No.12398038]

>>12398021

[Anonymous No.12398053]

[Anonymous No.12398060]

>>12398024
It wasn’t online. I did it with paper and pencil, my test had 100 questions and I had around an hit to do it

[Anonymous No.12398063]

>>12398060
Hour*

[Anonymous No.12398066]

>>12397994
Yes and no (unfortunately)

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398073]

[Anonymous No.12398075]

>>12398021

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398089]

[Anonymous No.12398090]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398094]

>>12398089

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398104]

>>12398094

[Anonymous No.12398111]

[Anonymous No.12398126]

>>12397969
>144 IQ tested
I high bug-person bean counting efficiency score does not at all preclude you from midwitery

[Anonymous No.12398142]

>>12398075

Chirico's use of italian architecture is probably my favorite PERIOD as far as modern implementation of architecture/landscape goes. No one did it better than him in the 1900s, fuck the later surrealists.

[Anonymous No.12398162]

[Anonymous No.12398168]

>>12398162

[Anonymous No.12398188]

[Anonymous No.12398207]

[Anonymous No.12398211]

>>12398207

[Anonymous No.12398231]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398261]

>>12398231

[Anonymous No.12398276]

[Anonymous No.12398280]

[Anonymous No.12398304]

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398307]

>>12398276

[Anonymous No.12398459]

>>12397704
I drew this

[Anonymous No.12398491]

>>12398307

go the fuck away.

>>12398231

This jolly fellow reminds me of Jarry's Pere Ubu.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398502]

>>12398491

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398505]

>>12398304
>>12398280

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398511]

>>12398142

[Anonymous No.12398513]

i have some things

[Anonymous No.12398518]

>>12397969
You can be a pseud and still have a high iq, was speaking about the average person who posts impressionist artwork. Rudeness is to be expected where social regulation mechanisms are relaxed for the sake of low friction spread of information. I'm being rude because people who post impressionist art tend to be agreeable and easily offended faggots.
>develop your tastes
what you gravitate towards initially is a strong indication of what you will settle for ultimately, I don't know why you give a damn about what I think of you.

[Anonymous No.12398520]

>>12398513
love shimura's use of patterns

[Anonymous No.12398530]

hans bellmer could appeal to anyone who fapped to lolita, his dolls, that is.

[Anonymous No.12398532]

>>12398053

Insert Ramiel joke. I'd like to encourage discussion of specific art books that anons have read or spent time with.

Read-and-looked-at this, cover to cover as a kid, it's the definitive scholarly work on Escher, with a good leading biography and catalogue raisonne. The one defect is that several plates occupy one page, so you don't really view the work, but you know what it is, where it is, etc.

[Anonymous No.12398536]

[Anonymous No.12398543]

>>12398532

Derp. Other anons please also post about art books, specifically.

[Anonymous No.12398547]

>>12398536
sorry, i am a retard, i didnt want to spoiler that

[Anonymous No.12398558]

[Anonymous No.12398562]

[Anonymous No.12398580]

yamantakaaaaa

[Anonymous No.12398582]

>>12398511
The Art Spirit by Robert Henri. He's américain and therefore doesn't fully understand the meaning of art but he still makes a few good observations in that book.

[Anonymous No.12398586]

obligatory william blake

[Anonymous No.12398593]

pommy granite flower

[Anonymous No.12398600]

>>12398582
meant for
>>12398543

[Anonymous No.12398602]

bye, fags

[Anonymous No.12398616]

>>12397718
I'm with you, Anon. Impressionism is my favorite style because it's what I imagine my nostalgic memories look like in my head: it's about capturing how the moment feels rather than capturing fine details. That's why it has its distinct look. Sure, it's not the most technical nor the most intellectual artistic movement or style, but your favorites shouldn't really be based on objective aspects like that. It's one thing to appreciate art and the elements that govern it, but it's another thing entirely to naturally gravitate towards a specific theme, subject, technique, medium, etc.

You got a favorite piece? Monet's Water Lilies series is my favorite. I once had to go to the Legion of Honor in SF for an essay about a Bouguereau piece that was collected there, and I just so happened to catch a showing of major Impressionist works. I nearly shit my pants when I saw Water Lilies in the corner because I didn't even know they had it there. Seeing them in person is a totally different experience since the impressionists didn't give a fuck about how much oil paint they used. There were literal mountain ridges of hardened paint that made shadows on the canvas.

It's as normalfag as it gets, but why should I let other people's opinions about my own opinions affect what I like?

[Anonymous No.12398624]

>>12398459
Good job I like it

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.12398625]

>>12398602

[Anonymous No.12398643]

>>12397799
he can't get over a girl and he knows he's not willing to get over it

[Anonymous No.12398653]

0ne version of Hick's Peaceful Kingdom

[Anonymous No.12398663]

>>12398653
Dude, this sucks.

[Anonymous No.12398670]

ITT: /lit/ /his/ and /pol/ all have trash taste in artwork

[Anonymous No.12398671]

>>12397704
Nigger

[Anonymous No.12398686]

>>12398520
this is just beautiful

[Anonymous No.12398737]

[Anonymous No.12398739]

>>12398582

You have posted incorrect faux-chauvinism in response to my prompt, after one failed >>12398600 attempt. I wonder why you did this.

[Anonymous No.12398748]

>>12398737

[Anonymous No.12398749]

>>12398748

[Anonymous No.12398757]

>>12397847
>abstract intellectual engagement with the piece

[Anonymous No.12398758]

I'm a sucker for nordic art from the turn of the century. Anders Zorn painted some exceptional portraits too.

[Anonymous No.12398759]

>>12398670
Yeah I'm actually impressed by how boring this thread is

[Anonymous No.12398760]

[Anonymous No.12398771]

>>12398759

>not posting Best Woman

[Anonymous No.12398779]

>>12398760
Got that one in my living room

[Anonymous No.12398899]

>>12397704

[Anonymous No.12398905]

>>12398899

[Anonymous No.12398981]

>>12398670
To be fair, I'm mildly impressed so far, no spam of Bouguereau or Beksinski to be found.

>>12397944
Edward Lucie Smith - Art Today

[Anonymous No.12399142]

>>12397739
Is that Sargon? Why is his penor so small?

[Anonymous No.12399397]

I don't get art. it makes me feel bad because life isn't like that. I appreciate animation and novels and to a certain extent poetry but painting I find repulsing: it's not an accurate reflection of reality but a romanticisation of it; not that it is inherently bad to be so, but disgusting because it's out of touch with reality. I suppose I cannot be entertained by a piece of artwork.

[Anonymous No.12399405]

>>12399397
Don't worry, it's quite normal to feel that way when you're a retard.

[Anonymous No.12399408]

>>12399397
I suppose what I mean is that art expresses beauty that I personally don't find in reality and that suggests artificiality to me.

[Anonymous No.12399423]

Glad we're having this thread, gonna post I few I just saw.

[Anonymous No.12399428]

>>12399408
Art doesn't need to represent reality at all. If you don't like art that depicts beauty, then look for something different. The most basic goal of art is to evoke a feeling; doesn't need to be the admiration of conventional beauty.

[Anonymous No.12399429]

Anyone else find Renaissance art and the like redundant? Impressionism is good but it also starts feeling that way also. It's all brilliant in person ofc, but it doesn't always do it for my stylistically.

[Anonymous No.12399438]

lit doesnt rly tend to post black artists so ill help you out a bit

just saw this in person last week, incredibly vivid

[Anonymous No.12399440]

>>12399428
>the most basic goal of art is to evoke feeling

Yes, repulsion is a feeling. It has caused a response.

[Anonymous No.12399445]

>>12399440
Repulsion isn't a feeling you generally want to revisit.

[Anonymous No.12399447]

[Anonymous No.12399451]

>>12399428
Art doesn't want anything. What the artist wants is another question.

[Anonymous No.12399454]

Any fans of Dix here?

[Anonymous No.12399456]

Also, American art is underrated in general. It very much does its own thing that I don't see people appreciating often.

[Anonymous No.12399457]

>>12399445
Is art better viewed in person than it is on a computer screen? Because I think I'm missing out. The few paintings that I have seen in person I appreciated.

[Anonymous No.12399459]

>>12399408

Are you the kind of guy who can look at an old Street sweeper and wonder just how his life turned out that way, measuring his work as a beautiful expression of utility or perhaps lament at lost potential, but then see a sunset and feel nothing?

I'm like that. Natural beauty is all well and good but without being within a human framework it means little to me.

[Anonymous No.12399460]

>>12399397
>I appreciate animation
Yes, that figures, you drooling cretin.

[Anonymous No.12399464]

[Anonymous No.12399468]

>>12399459
Holy mother of cringe.

[Anonymous No.12399469]

>>12399454
sure, also he was such a visionary

[Anonymous No.12399473]

>>12399457

Not the guy you were talking to but it's significantly better in person. Pieces you'll see in person will seem drab online by contrast. I didn't appreciate Picasso or any classics until seeing them in person. Go to museums often anon. I live by NYC so I'm fortunate in that regard, and recently (also by fortune) was able to go to Paris and see a few as well. You MUST see art in person to appreciate it, it's very difficult to feel its soul otherwise.

[Anonymous No.12399478]

>>12399457
>Is art better viewed in person than it is on a computer screen?
Absolutely. It's an entirely different experience. Looking at Rembrandt on google images is nice, but it doesn't do much for me, and for the longest time that was the only way I experienced his work. Then I saw his Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis in person, at touching-distance, and was absolutely awestruck. You can't appreciate the craft at all without having seen it in person.

[Anonymous No.12399487]

[Anonymous No.12399488]

>>12399456
Americans are weird with their boner for wide landscapes and nature in general. The very same nature they raped for centuries is some kind of fetish for them, more important than human culture. Back to nature but in a car. Idiots.

[Anonymous No.12399490]

>>12399445

Actually I'd argue that. I've felt deeply unsettled by movies like Perfect Blue and Bergman's Persona and i'd certainly revisit it. Any powerful experience that isn't truly harmful can be worth revisiting.

>>12399428

I think the most basic goal of art is to provide an outlet for the soul. By nature man is inclined to make art, it's incredibly primal i believe.

[Anonymous No.12399493]

[Anonymous No.12399500]

[Anonymous No.12399504]

>>12397704
My favorite

[Anonymous No.12399508]

>>12399488

Fair enough, you're not wrong at all. I thought the same thing somewhat. When you're in another continent whose countries are deeply rooted in a tradition, the land feels historically entwined with the culture you're standing in. But America's land is beautiful, yet not ours at all, it almost feels uncanny in that way. And it's unsettling that we glorify it the way we do with our landscapes, but I don't think landscapes are the best of American art as it is. It's the use of those flat colors the way people like Hopper do that I really like.

[Anonymous No.12399510]

what is some particularly /fa/ art?

[Anonymous No.12399511]

>>12399504

[Anonymous No.12399512]

>>12398670
>doesn't post anything himself
As expected.

[Anonymous No.12399518]

>>12399510

the Les Nabis movement for sure

pic related

[Anonymous No.12399534]

[Anonymous No.12399547]

>>12399490
>Actually I'd argue that. I've felt deeply unsettled by movies like Perfect Blue and Bergman's Persona and i'd certainly revisit it. Any powerful experience that isn't truly harmful can be worth revisiting.
I was thinking repulsion as an expression of disgust and perhaps hate, which, unless something is fascinating, is not something I seek out again. You're still right, and I agree about Bergman.

>I think the most basic goal of art is to provide an outlet for the soul. By nature man is inclined to make art, it's incredibly primal i believe.
Yeah. Outlet for the soul, outlet for emotions. However you choose to word it.

[Anonymous No.12399555]

>>12397729
Thanks for saying that. I've seen this picture countless times and finding out van Gogh painted this blew me away. We truly live in the best universe.

[Anonymous No.12399563]

I always see these next few posted, but even over the computer screen they invoke such a strong feeling. I someday hope to see these in person

[Anonymous No.12399573]

>>12399563
Cringy fantasy illustration. What did you wanna see in person?

[Anonymous No.12399576]

Sexual abstinence, I love art.
When I'm masturbating/having sex, I could care less.
Can anyone else relate?

[Anonymous No.12399586]

>>12399573
I've always felt awe at the concept of something so grand in scale that humans are in effect nothing. Generally nature shots, but the occasional sci-fi works as well, though I have none of these to post

[Anonymous No.12399598]

[Anonymous No.12399605]

[Anonymous No.12399610]

[Anonymous No.12399615]

[Anonymous No.12399624]

>>12399576

Abstinence heightens your spiritual sensitivity and therefore inclines you to more fully appreciate art. Lust, masturbation, and sex, mitigate this quality. Hence the connection between asceticism and mysticism.

[Anonymous No.12399629]

[Anonymous No.12399630]

>>12397850
God this is so good, thanks for sharing

[Anonymous No.12399633]

[Anonymous No.12399634]

no love for my boy?

[Anonymous No.12399640]

[Anonymous No.12399642]

>>12399634
you are like little baby

[Anonymous No.12399644]

>>12399457
Without a doubt. I had no interest in art until I went to Paris on holiday and went through the Lourve. I didn't expect to like it, but it ended up being the highlight of the trip.

[Anonymous No.12399647]

>>12399633
The Tiger is out

[Anonymous No.12399648]

We need threads like this more often, the art discussions are more fruitful than people wanking over Ulysses.

On that note, what do you all think of Instagram art in relation to the role of art historically? Its transition from image of the soul to instagram commodity is interesting and I think foreshadowed by Warhol's use of capitalist symbols as inspiration.

[Anonymous No.12399652]

>>12399644

I found the Louvre overrated personally, it was more or less a glorified MET. Too big to fully appreciate and a lot of the exhibits started getting redundant. I did love the hall next to the Winged Victory with all the Christian art though. Musee D'orsay is much better in my opinion, did you go?

[Anonymous No.12399656]

>>12398758
What's this style? This is what I'm into, beautiful

[Anonymous No.12399658]

How do you tell if a painting is good or bad?

>thinking apu.jpg (don't wanna raise the image count for no reason)

[Anonymous No.12399661]

[Anonymous No.12399662]

>>12399656
He (Anders Zorn) and his generation of scandinavian painters were very inspired by the continetal impressionism of the late 19th century. More narrowly, it's simply nordic turn-of-the-century, so late 19th - early 20th century.

[Anonymous No.12399664]

>>12399652
d'Orsay is not even one tenth of Louvre in size. It's a silly comparison.

[Anonymous No.12399665]

>>12399658
Here, you dropped this.

[Anonymous No.12399672]

this was Proust's favorite painting ever
>“Ever since I saw the View of Delft in the museum in The Hague, I have known that I had seen the most beautiful painting in the world”

[Anonymous No.12399673]

[Anonymous No.12399681]

>>12399673
>nude peasant girls in the swedish summer
Anders Zorn was a man of impeccable taste.

[Anonymous No.12399683]

>>12399672
Very mundane and prosaic. Much like most of Proust's work.

[Anonymous No.12399699]

>>12399662
Thank you so much. A quick google search and he blew my mind. His style is so creamy and soft, he really does know how to accentuate the female's body beauty.

[Anonymous No.12399718]

>>12399664

I wasn't comparing size, just saying the quality of art was greater imo.

[Anonymous No.12399731]

Does anyone know of other works similar in topic (i.e., nude with book) to this nude by Isaac Israëls? Impressionist preferred, but all genres are fair game.

[Anonymous No.12399740]

>>12397729
Agreed

[Anonymous No.12399747]

>>12399731
Look no further than the previously mentioned Anders Zorn.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Zorn

[Anonymous No.12399753]

This scene (Thérèse Dreaming by Balthus, 1938) may evoke a heady blend of comfort and a flustering sensation caused by the viewer catching a girl on the threshold of womanhood in a slightly indecent pose.

Unsurprisingly, some people object to the Met exhibiting this painting, but the museum — rightly — refuses to remove it.

[Anonymous No.12399776]

[Anonymous No.12399778]

>>12399747
Zorn painted some great nudes, but I couldn't find one with a book being read in it as well in his oeuvre.

[Anonymous No.12399783]

>>12399142
No, and the greeks perfered small dongs.

[Anonymous No.12399785]

>>12399661
>>12399610
>>12399598
>>12399563
what is it with burger landscape painters and abusing light for bombast

[Anonymous No.12399786]

>>12397821
What cue are you talking about in the end?

[Anonymous No.12399836]

>>12399397
It can be like that when you have the emotional range of a tea spoon
Also
>i appreciate animation
>art repulses me because it represents a romantisation of reality and it feels very artificial
Hypocrite that you are

[Anonymous No.12399850]

>>12398616
Not the anon you were replying to but I had a similar reaction to his Wheatstacks series when I first visited the Art Institute in Chicago. I also get nostalgic, sort of sweetly melancholic feelings when I look at impressionist stuff. I think intellectualism in art is great but that's not all there is to it at all. Even the stuff that speaks to you intellectually, if it doesn't also speak to you emotionally, isn't going to have as profound an effect on you.

[Anonymous No.12399853]

[Anonymous No.12399856]

[Anonymous No.12399858]

>>12399408
>i dont find what's the fuss about painting
>therefore all paintings are disgusting artificial wastes of time without meaning
>if i dont get it, it's bad
I never thought i would see someone so identical to this meme

[Anonymous No.12399883]

>>12399456

Spooky Hopper.

[Anonymous No.12399895]

>>12399456

Spooky Wyeth.

[Anonymous No.12399896]

>>12399783
Now I can feel better about myself.

[Anonymous No.12399901]

>>12398459
This is nice I like the bus and the bird because they're slightly wrong and very believable.

[Anonymous No.12399908]

>>12397704
Damn I love this guy

[Anonymous No.12399913]

>>12399908

[Anonymous No.12399922]

>>12399563
Don't listen to those other guys. Cole is fantastic.

[Anonymous No.12399934]

>>12399922
>deviantart tier illustration
>fantastic

[Anonymous No.12399936]

>>12399508
Not super huge into art but Hopper always captivated me. I love how he's able to capture a sense of stillness, especially in his interiors.

[Anonymous No.12399947]

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTRal7R3G0f8E9rOf82XbZiBhL6IxzDCJ
This boi has really helped me appreciate modern art.

[Anonymous No.12399951]

>>12399947
Contemporary art*

[Anonymous No.12399970]

[Anonymous No.12399986]

>>12399776
didn't knew it, it's great
>>12399753
feels good
>>12399856
actually makes my day

btw if some of you guys are into that kind of stuff, oldbookillustrations dot com is a great source

[Anonymous No.12400166]

[Anonymous No.12400171]

>>12399753

[Anonymous No.12400201]

>>12399853
"Look, right here Jesus says to gamble, drink, and fornicate outside of marriage"
"You speaketh from thine ass"
"Lmao shut up"

[Anonymous No.12400261]

>>12400166
Awesome. More women with books (clothing optional).

[Anonymous No.12400292]

>>12397728
Hello, Turner knockoff.

[Anonymous No.12400321]

This thread has reached its image limit. An annex has been opened here:

>> 12400315

Please exit this thread through the gift shop.

[Anonymous No.12400325]

>>12400315

[Anonymous No.12400875]

>>12397851
God what beautiful lighting. Thank you for posting this.

[Anonymous No.12400932]

>>12397850
>Very Fast Doggo Running at Incredible Hihg Speed

[Anonymous No.12401136]

>>12398518
>>12397847
You are an absolute pseudo-intellectual. Its in the way you speak. Stop thinking of yourself as a genius, because its clear that somewhere in your mind you do.
Art without emotional engagement is ugly soulless shit for bug-people in inhuman office jobs. Please either get a soul or off yourself. Impressionism is good not based on whether it is obscurantist or not but because it elicits a positive reaction from people.

[Anonymous No.12401181]

>>12398759
>>12398771
>>12398981
Shit like this is the fedora-tipping of art.

[Anonymous No.12401202]

>>12401136
>it's popular therefore it's good!
Cringe.

[Anonymous No.12401251]

>>12401202
>!
cringe

[Anonymous No.12401262]

>>12401251
Hey so check this out the other day I was walking home and I had this vision that today I'd encounter the lowest effort post of all time and low and behold here it is hahaha I guess thats what I get though huh not like I'll remember it tomorrow or even in a few hours for that matter but what can I say except holy shit imagine being what I can only imagine a grown man arguing with another grown man about punctuation which may or not be more cringe than the other and on top of that in an art thread of all places where so far the conversation has been relatively civil I mean its not like you have to defend your ego on an anonymous site anyway so maybe that vision wasn't supposed to be good but who knows I don't

[Anonymous No.12401316]

>>12401202
Stupid strawman. Its not that its popular therefor its good, but its good because of its emotional potential and communication. On the other hand, your obscurantist shit is not objectively good just because you think its post-modern message is so clever.

[Anonymous No.12401322]

>>12401262
Dude you wrote a paragraph about this holy shit.
Everything you wrote pretty much applies to you.

[Anonymous No.12401331]

>>12401322
Dude nuh-uh because of my vision and shit plus I felt like we here can be so much more than quibbles and directionless banter besides you and I are really good friends anyway so after all is said and done yeah i might have also wasted my time but that time wasn't going anywhere important most likely