[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 125 KB, 680x1209, 19122133-3737-4113-A2ED-0E3FD583A37C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12383872 No.12383872 [Reply] [Original]

What books are intellectual poison?

>> No.12383878

>>12383872
my diary desu

>> No.12383883
File: 19 KB, 219x298, 22E4CB88-FF44-452E-92B5-81CAAED2A380.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12383883

>>12383872
All of them.

>> No.12383885

Anything not written by a male.

>> No.12383940

>>12383872
Do you think girls desire manly men like the one pictured here? Is that what they tend to thirst for? Do any of them like more submissive, and shy men, who have only average though boyish physiques?

>> No.12383957

>>12383940
>Do any of them like more submissive, and shy men
No, but plenty of men do.

>> No.12383965

>>12383940
The shy dad bod beta fantasy exists only in the minds of men. Any women entertaining it are doing it solely out of desperation as women are desperate for mates. You even asking this makes me want to literally beat the living shit out of you.

>> No.12383974

>>12383940
Yes, there are women who like weak men but they are gold diggers or far worse, psychological vampires.

>> No.12383979

>>12383940
No. Start going to the gym faggot and hope you can at least be a jacked manlet.

>> No.12383988

>>12383940
The 9S archetype is actualy pretty popular with woman but you actually need to have a pretty/handsome face to pull it off.

>> No.12384001

>>12383940
>Do any of them like more submissive, and shy men
absolutely not
>who have only average though boyish physiques
this is more likely

you don't need to be jacked to get girls (slim can work too), but you do need to be confident and at least somewhat dominant

>> No.12385233
File: 3.24 MB, 1412x2000, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12385233

>>12383872
none of them

>> No.12385237

>>12383872
LOOK OUT BOYS ON-TOPIC POST COMING THROUGH

>What books are intellectual poison?
Any Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens.

>> No.12385281

>>12383940
Cute sub guys are attractive to me. As long as he's a good boy and pleases me.

>> No.12385290

What is intellectual poison?

>> No.12385301

>>12385290
If you need to ask that question, you probably shouldn't be answering it.

>> No.12385312

>>12385301
Alright.
I won't.
What is intellectual poison?

>> No.12385314

>>12383883
This but unironically.

>> No.12385325

>>12383872
Ironically, Schopenhauer

>> No.12385327

>>12385281
he said girls

>> No.12385328

>>12385312
Literature that makes you a brainlet, or dumber by reading it.

>> No.12385351

>>12385328
>Book is good, absorb good lessons.
>Book is bad, reject low-quality ideas, stronger for it.
What's the alternative? What's that actually look like?

>> No.12385361

>>12385351
High-quality ideas which are immoral

>> No.12385372

>>12385361
Immoral?

>> No.12385399

>>12385327
I'm a woman, buddy. I have dom fantasies though. Especially of younger men.

>> No.12385403

>>12385372
Yeah, you know, bad?

>> No.12385406
File: 218 KB, 750x531, A6662AC4-658C-42AA-BFB5-FA2467C19A8E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12385406

>>12383883
>>12385233
Extremely based

>> No.12385412

Everything written by Naomi Klein, Michael Moore or Noam Chomsky. You really can't get more sleep-woke and politically incorrect in actual meaning of word incorrect than by reading their garbage.

>> No.12385429

>>12383883
based af

>> No.12385434

>>12385399
nice try, tranny

>> No.12385475

Obvious answer: the bibble
One is supposed to jump through hoops to make it sound deep and wonderful, but it says people of creativity, real love, and intellectual growth. It has helped to sell generations into slavery. These “flocks” still praise it as some kind of cultural high point or guiding light, but leads you to an empty death in delusion.

Zombies. I want to break this spell and save you, but you have to make some effort yourselves

>> No.12385479

>>12385475
>says
Saps

>> No.12385480

you're not getting a (You) from me, tripautist

>> No.12385486

>>12385475
>>12385479
Dumbest poster on this board

>> No.12385506

>>12385434
Nice try, faggot.

>> No.12385572

>>12383872
Anything written by a rightist

>> No.12385584

The monadology and the republic but only if you take them too seriously

>> No.12385596

>>12385475
retard

>> No.12385614

>>12383878
Came to see if this was posted, I'm glad it's the first post.

>> No.12385686

>>12385281
Are you really a grill? I'm the original asker. Do you know if other girls out there also wouldn't mind a submissive man, provided he's a good boy? And if I also want to care for the girl, by hugging her and giving her glasses of warm milk that I hold before her lips and slowly pour into her mouth while she gently sips, and I also gently kiss her cheek and neck because I am so happy my sweetheart is drinking her milk since she deserves such nourishment, and the comfort which comes from it. Will things like this be okay, for such dominant girls? To be submissive, yet still caring? I am not into anything involving pain, or bullying.

>> No.12385703

>>12385686
fuck off creep

>> No.12385850

the namefag needs to fuck off and die
fucking hiromoot needs to remove the option to namefag or tripfag at all, it does more harm than good

>> No.12385900

>>12383940
>tfw shy skinny male and blush often
>tfw Stirnerian egoist
I’ll hit the gym this year so my body can match my psyche

>> No.12385929

>>12385686
based mommyposter continues to detail his wholesome fantasies

>> No.12385930

>>12385475
Get outta here mothman

>> No.12385953

>>12385475
Did you know the tailpipes of cars produce a gas with effects similar to marijuana?

>> No.12385981

>>12385850
Over to /b/ if that’s what you love

>>12385953
I only cheap ass anonymous posters

>> No.12386262

>>12385850
Go over to /b/ if that’s what you love

>>12385953
I only smoke cheap ass anonymous posters
(Somehow "smoke" got crunched. Whatever. Cheap post. sage)

>> No.12387422

>>12386262
show your butthole, i want to fuck you

>> No.12387429
File: 5 KB, 299x168, Just can't do it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12387429

All works of erotica are intellectual poison

>> No.12387451

Anything by Foucault, or any social psychologist. They should be read with extreme scepticism, if at all.

>> No.12387458

>>12387451
>psychologist
or psychologists in general, daily reminder that psychology has not ever cured a single person

>> No.12387927

>>12383872
None. All literature has some value.

>> No.12387951

>>12387927
value is in the eyes of the beholder

>> No.12387987

>>12387927
categorically false

>> No.12388074

>>12387927
Yes, but which ones have the most value? If everything has value, that doesn’t make everything good, it leaves plenty of room for “relatively shit” and “why read x when you could read more Russians”.

>> No.12388083
File: 650 KB, 950x706, Mars_and_Rhea_Silvia_by_Nicolas_Colombel,_1694.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12388083

>>12388074
Whether some is high-brow or low-brow isn't subjective; there's a reason why what's considered high-brow is similar
in wildly different cultures, and that is because high-brow has an objective definition. It's always had an objective
definition: for the last thousand years philosophers have made a clear distinction between simple pleasures (e.g. sex)
and high-order pleasures (e.g. literature). Pleasure derivation -- as you will see -- is the core determinant of an
activity's place on the spectrum of cultural sophistication.

Things that are instantly gratifying generally have little value. It's obvious why we have a gut feeling for whether
something is trash, low-class, pleb shit. The feeling comes from knowing that it's not very rewarding, which means it
requires no effort, which means that even an animal could do it. Compare this with the feeling of accomplishment of
having completed a long, complex book. This is why reading is considered high-brow, but getting hammered every night isn't.

All of this stuff has been confirmed by neuroscience at a fundamental level, and more generally by psychology/sociology.
High-brow interests can actually activate neural networks that aren't present in most animals, and these brain regions
are thought to involve pleasures above simple stimulation like eating and masturbating; they take into account future states
of happiness despite the current activity not being pleasant. Example: you're working hard creating music, are frustrated
and angry, yet you're happy knowing that you'll have created something of high aesthetic value when you're done.