[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 24 KB, 220x277, 7BEEBB48-1B24-4499-97A3-C0025050C661.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12298802 No.12298802 [Reply] [Original]

ITT: writers who are better than Shakespeare.

>> No.12298807

>>12298802
There aren't any.

>> No.12298810
File: 37 KB, 193x266, 235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12298810

>> No.12298818

>>12298802
What do you mean? In terms of form and language use? Then like this anon said: >>12298807
In terms of moral and psychological depth? Then Dostoevsky.
In terms of imagery? Then Proust.

>> No.12298820
File: 24 KB, 465x594, 26D326B6-0642-4722-91FC-38F7977B6660.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12298820

>>12298807
*blocks your path*

>> No.12298831

>>12298807
fpbp.

>> No.12298835

>>12298831
No it’s wrong.

>> No.12298840
File: 41 KB, 800x450, oogaboogaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12298840

>>12298810
Why is every single thread on this board a crude dick measuring contest. Fucking Grugs, I swear.
>What is best?
>This good.
>No! That bad! This better.
>No! You brainlet!
>Shut up! You is brainlet! I strawman you with greentext!

>> No.12298846

>>12298820
I hate him and I hate that he lived as long as he did

>> No.12298848

>>12298818
I haven't read Proust, is his imagery really better than McCarthy's?

>> No.12299386

>>12298818
>>12298848
Jesus fucking christ /lit/

>> No.12299397

>>12298802
How is chaucer better than Shakespeare? I get loving Chaucer more but Shakespeare reaches unrealistic GOAT levels of writing

>> No.12299409

>>12298840

this

>> No.12299415

>>12299386
The only thing more disgraceful than ignorance is sneering at it.

>> No.12299434

>>12299415
Proust wrote novels, not plays. Imagery is not an argument.

That, and
>IS IT BETTER THAN BLOOD MERIDIAN??

YES PROUST IS BETTER THAN CORMAC MCCARTHY IN LITERALLY EVERY SINGLE WAY. CORMHACK WRITES SHITTY FANTASY TIER GARBAGE IN DISGUISE WITH WESTERN AND APOCALYPTIC LANDSCAPES

>> No.12299439

>>12299434
Much better post than
>lol brainlets

>> No.12299448

>>12299397
OP here. Shakespeare is undeniably a genius but he is often sloppy and extremely derivative. Which is fine. Often geniuses do not know how to properly direct their gifts. But Chaucer is always clear, never falters stylistically, is far more original and is funnier too.

>> No.12299453

>>12298807
>>12298810
>>12298818
>>12298820
>>12298831
>>12298835
>>12298840
>>12298846
>>12298848
>>12299386
>>12299397
>>12299409
>>12299415
>>12299434
>>12299439
>>12299448
sean f kay