[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 8 KB, 182x277, phenomenology.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12240322 No.12240322 [Reply] [Original]

>What are your hobbies anon
>W-well, I read books
>Really? What have you been reading recently?
>Uh...t-the Phenomenology of Spirit...
>Oh.... well what's it about?
>....

>> No.12240827

>>12240322
i think all women should read phenomenology of spirit because they're all fucking negative bitches like hegel

>> No.12240836

>>12240322
i just finished a uni course around this book and i probably couldn't answer this question in any meaningful way despite doing quite well

>> No.12240838
File: 1.50 MB, 1280x800, modernism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12240838

>>12240322
>Do you anything else, or do you just read?

>> No.12240851
File: 569 KB, 816x1024, 1544931587288.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12240851

>>12240322
>Oh.... well what's it about?
>It's a work of a pre-Temple of Set stream of Illuminatism written by a devout Luciferian adept that lays the foundation for the anti-Christ's immanentization

>> No.12241089

>>12240322

Continental philosophy is for idiots. Hegel was a moron.

>> No.12241100

>>12240322
Is reading a hobby? It's not very constructive.

>> No.12241130

>>12240838
i dont get it

>> No.12242735

>>12240851
That's Fichtian dialectics tho, Hegel never claimed that you should just randomly synthetize concepts

>> No.12242753
File: 14 KB, 220x321, Georges_Bataille_vers_1943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12242753

Death

The animal dies. But the death of the animal is the becoming of consciousness.

>> No.12242774

>>12240322
chads who read Schopenhauer do not have this problem
>What are your hobbies anon
>reading books (said firmly with a sprinkling of contempt)
>Really? What have you been reading recently?
>The world as will and idea
>Oh... well what's it about?
>*pushes down stairs*

>> No.12242782

>>12241089
Based and redpilled

>> No.12242807

>>12240322
Spirits progression through history.

>> No.12242818

>>12242774
Kek

>captcha: stairs

>> No.12242833

>What are your hobbies anon
>W-well, I read books
>Really? What have you been reading recently?
>Uh..Coehlo's The Alchemist...
>Oh.... well what's it about?
>....

>> No.12242853

>What are your hobbies anon
>W-well, I read1 books
>Really? What have you been reading recently?
>Uh...t-the Leviathan...
>Oh.... well what's it about?
> The first cause of Absurd conclusions I ascribe to the want of Method; in that they begin not their Ratiocination from Definitions; that is, from settled significations of their words: as if they could cast account, without knowing the value of the numerall words, One, Two, and Three.

And whereas all bodies enter into account upon divers considerations, (which I have mentioned in the precedent chapter;) these considerations being diversly named, divers absurdities proceed from the confusion, and unfit connexion of their names into assertions. And therefore

The second cause of Absurd assertions, I ascribe to the giving of names of Bodies, to Accidents; or of Accidents, to Bodies; As they do, that say, Faith Is Infused, or Inspired; when nothing can be Powred, or Breathed into any thing, but body; and that, Extension is Body; that Phantasmes are Spirits, &c.

The third I ascribe to the giving of the names of the Accidents of Bodies Without Us, to the Accidents of our Own Bodies; as they do that say, the Colour Is In The Body; The Sound Is In The Ayre, &c.

The fourth, to the giving of the names of Bodies, to Names, or Speeches; as they do that say, that There Be Things Universall; that A Living Creature Is Genus, or A Generall Thing, &c.

The fifth, to the giving of the names of Accidents, to Names and Speeches; as they do that say, The Nature Of A Thing Is In Its Definition; A Mans Command Is His Will; and the like.

The sixth, to the use of Metaphors, Tropes, and other Rhetoricall figures, in stead of words proper. For though it be lawfull to say, (for example) in common speech, The Way Goeth, Or Leadeth Hither, Or Thither, The Proverb Sayes This Or That (whereas wayes cannot go, nor Proverbs speak;) yet in reckoning, and seeking of truth, such speeches are not to be admitted.

The seventh, to names that signifie nothing; but are taken up, and learned by rote from the Schooles, as Hypostatical, Transubstantiate, Consubstantiate, Eternal-now, and the like canting of Schoole-men.

To him that can avoyd these things, it is not easie to fall into any absurdity, unlesse it be by the length of an account; wherein he may perhaps forget what went before. For all men by nature reason alike, and well, when they have good principles. For who is so stupid, as both to mistake in Geometry, and also to persist in it, when another detects his error to him?

>1 He actually doesn't.

>> No.12242869

>>12241089
Based and STEMpilled

>> No.12242871

>>12240322
>You read? That's cool anon, what's your favorite genre?
>U-Um... T-the Greeks...
>...

>> No.12243205

>>12240851
>>It's a work of a pre-Temple of Set stream of Illuminatism

Huh?