/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12234924]

ITT: writers who are definitely burning in hell.

[Anonymous No.12234934]

Hell doesn’t real, anon.
This thread doesn’t funny either

[Anonymous No.12234938]

>>12234924

The guy who discovered the andrea-lewis effect.

[Anonymous No.12234940]

>>12234934
It is real but I agree that this thread isn’t funny. It’s deeply saddening. Please say a prayer for the lost souls.

[Anonymous No.12234941]

hegel. for sure hegel.

[Anonymous No.12234943]

>>12234924

and any other french philosopher

>>12234934

back to r*ddit

[Anonymous No.12234947]

>>12234934

[Anonymous No.12234958]

>>12234941
>>12234943
True.

[Anonymous No.12234974]

>>12234941
I'm at a loss with this one.

[Anonymous No.12234977]

>>12234934
>Hell doesn’t real, anon.

This.

>>12234924

She was so gifted that God himself was going to dive into the pits to rescue her and keep her as interlocutor for Eternity.

>>12234943
>back to r*ddit
>>12234947

You people are all conservative and religious because it is the fashion of the day. All young people are on this wave thiking they are special when in fact they would all be hippies in the 60s and "rebels without a cause" in the 50's.Of course, there are the old dudes that were so depressed with their lives that only by "finding Christ" they could keep on living.

Normies.

[Anonymous No.12234980]

>>12234924
Kek

[Anonymous No.12234992]

>>12234938
What is the andrea-lewis effect? Google and yandex give me nothing. Did you just make that up?

[Anonymous No.12235014]

>>12234924

[Anonymous No.12235038]

>>12234992

The andrea-lewis effect, to be brief, is when a male who forms part of a power couple fucks a married female in his place of employment who has one or more children and whose status is below that of his and his wife, causing the subordinate couple’s consequent divorce and the humiliation of every member of said family.

[Anonymous No.12235085]

>>12234924
Why would she be going to hell?

[Anonymous No.12235118]

>>12235085

for teasing my cock

[Anonymous No.12235124]

>>12235085
This. Who the fuck is this ugly cunt and what did she write that was so bad?

[Anonymous No.12235150]

>>12234924
She was pious as fuck, what are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.12235158]

>>12234941
Im pretty sure the result of a dialectic between good and bad would be some other third option. The dichotomy of bad and good is primitive.

[Anonymous No.12235166]

>>12235085
>>12235150
b-but Bloom said she was a g-gnostic priestess of her own personal Luciferian (Lightbringer) religion, l-like Blake!

[Anonymous No.12235172]

>>12234974
Some nigger thought he was smart by trying to show the Hegelian dialectic as inherently evil. In short, Hegel postulates that truth is found in the synthesis which is made from the thesis and the antithesis. The thesis in his post being good and the antithesis being bad. Therefore the synthesis has to be bad. But, his post is flawed in that it considers morality as black and white with no grays.

[Anonymous No.12235182]

>>12235172
See, that's the conclusion I came to as well.

The entire everything is bad thing makes absolutely zero sense??

[Anonymous No.12235219]

>>12235166
I like Bloom a lot, and he's certainly lightyears more intelligent than I am... but he sure tended to pull some silly shit out his ass.

[Anonymous No.12235234]

>>12235219
He was right. The problem is he sees that as an admirable quality in a poet.

[Anonymous No.12235241]

>>12235166
>gnostic priestess of her own personal Luciferian religion

What's the problem? That just makes me like her even more.

[Anonymous No.12235245]

>>12235241

this

sounds hot as fuck and gnostics are unironically based

[Anonymous No.12235262]

>>12234924
She didn't kill herself, though.

[Anonymous No.12235270]

>>12235241
>>12235245
t. 19 year olds who will give up on literature and life before their 30s are over.

[Anonymous No.12235272]

>>12235270
Wanna make a bet?

[Anonymous No.12235278]

>>12235038
Thank you

[Anonymous No.12235341]

>>12235166
I don't know nothin bout that.

[Anonymous No.12235535]

>>12234977
>thousands year old tradition is fashion of the day

[Anonymous No.12235541]

>>12235535
Where do you think you are?

[Anonymous No.12235547]

>>12235166
When did he ever say that? You might be mistaking his opinion on Whitman.

[Anonymous No.12235597]

>>12235547
Oh he says it about Whitman too. In his book 'Genius' Bloom opens his portrait of Dickinson by saying how she, like Whitman and Crane, embodied the true "American Religion" and was a gnostic like Blake, however, unlike Blake, Ms. Emily did not try to construct an alternative system but rather, according to Bloom, allows her singular religion to remain private, seen only obscurely through some of her poetry.
I'd snap a pic of the page for you but the book is at the bottom of a pile and I'm not going to dig through all that just to get it.

[Anonymous No.12235627]

>>12234934
>hell doesnt real
*isn't
caught you BITCH how does it feel to be fucking caught in the act retard BITCH BITCH FUCK YOU FUCK YOU you probably didn't even REALISE your mistake but i told you and i told you reeaaaal good right i hope i have turned the pleasure you got from this post into displeasure its no less then you deserve

[Anonymous No.12235840]

>>12234941
But there is no good and bad absolute in this world, only a procession through time of warring forces towards the archetype of the Good.

[Anonymous No.12235849]

>>12234941
The absolute state of christcucks

[Anonymous No.12235869]

>>12235166
So she attained to the true liberation of the Ogdoad instead of being consigned to the Demiurge's region of the Hebdomad

Fuck psychikoi and fuck Irenaeus

[Anonymous No.12235873]

>>12234924

Nigger jew faggot leabian who supported the andrea-lewis curse

[Anonymous No.12235894]

>>12235234
How is it not? You're not some dirty moralist in your approach to art are you?

[Anonymous No.12235921]

>>12234941
>one-drop morality

[Anonymous No.12235935]

>>12235172
>black and white morality
yes that's religious morality, there tends to be hard lines between evil and god
>>12235182
think about multiplying by a negative, the entire thing is retarded because not only is that not the hegelian dialectic but Hegel was a Christian (hermeticist mystic pagan) and Christfaggots worship a blood god that feeds off the energy of virgin boys and girls.

[Anonymous No.12235965]

>>12235166
>>12235547
>>12235597
Everyone and everything is gnostic in the works of Harold Bloom. If Dante isn't, Beatrice is. Faust? Goethe? Confused gnostic. Whitman is of course gnostic, and if the rejection and denunciation of canonical tradition is essentially gnostic, Wordsworth, Shelley and Ashbery are as well (Stevens barely escapes this fate, thus a great but lesser poet). Yeats you might expect to be gnostic, but Dickens and Cervantes are a pleasant surprise. Cervantes is also jewish, thus a gnostic jew; Kafka, meanwhile, though a jew and a gnostic, somehow is not a Jewish gnostic. America is gnostic, its Christianity is gnostic; Shakespeare isn't gnostic, but Macbeth almost is. Borges at least is a self-professed gnostic; Beckett is for now a suspect.

[Anonymous No.12235994]

>>12235541
That's a question you should ask yourself

[Anonymous No.12235997]

>>12234977
>You people are all conservative and religious because it is the fashion of the day.
You're beyond retardation.

[Anonymous No.12236257]

>>12235997

Someone who post a pic like yours can’t call anyone retarded. And you’re also proving the guys fucking point you stupid fuck

[Anonymous No.12236260]

[Anonymous No.12236278]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_Zimmer_Bradley

[Anonymous No.12236319]

>>12234941
>>12234958
>>12234974
>>12235158
>>12235840
>>12235849
>>12235921

Dialectic is not the middle or midst of two polar opposites. By this definition, and prominently so, even Good plus Good is Bad. Hegel, in being right, leaves himself fundamentally open to all manner of attack, so much so that missing the point so badly is not only wrong but tragic.

Even Aristotle knows this:

>While the doctrine of Heraclitus, that all things are and are not, seems to make everything true, that of Anaxagoras, that there is an intermediate between the terms of a contradiction, seems to make everything false; for when things are mixed, the mixture is neither good nor not-good, so that one cannot say anything that is true.