[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 260 KB, 1277x556, 1540077420158.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12170403 No.12170403 [Reply] [Original]

I have a philosophy question. Can the erudite redpill philosophers on /lit/ help me? I believe asking you learned men who discuss difficult philosophical problems with the irreverent authority that only comes from passionate, arduous scholarship, will be more expedient than this lass figuring it out on her own.
Here it comes:

I was reading something and forgot where it was, I believe the most likely location is in the Standford encyclopedia of philosophy, somewhere in the pages on either location and mereology or plural quantification, or their citations, but I don't remember as I was very high spinning around, could be anywhere and prehaps it was in some journal. It was about someone who wrote about the mind as existing in context, it sounds very similar to what Peirce says about mind existing in the mind of nature(I don't think this can be properly interperted as a kind of panpsychism) and that thinking is the 'process' of paying attention to certain parts of the continuous development of the reality of thirdness represented in signs. That semiotic reality is what I like to call the reality of living thirdness.
Does anyone know where this radical contextual substantivalism comes from? I'm very interested in studying analytic metaphysics with Peirceian semiotics.

My blessed teachers, thank you in advance for your wise words.

>> No.12170448
File: 1.52 MB, 1475x1475, 263u0k5hbx021.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12170448

>> No.12170545

>>12170448
Please stop mocking me. I know you probably have better things to do but if y'all would take the time to help me it would be much appreciated.

>> No.12170655

>>12170545
Nah bro a ain't mocking, I have no idea what you are talking about in this thread so I bumped your tread with le doge meme

>> No.12170664

>>12170403
>lass
tits or gtfo

>> No.12170670

woops just kidding this is a blue board, and a catholic board. we do not subscribe to hippie fanfic philosophies that have no basis in reality.

>> No.12170681

>>12170670
Based

>> No.12170690

>>12170655
>>12170664
>>12170670
I didn't come here to be trolled gentlemen. Please stop feigning ignorance, and purposefully trying to seem like arrogant dilletantes.