I hate that I love this book.

[Anonymous No.12058582]

Why does it have to be written so well? Gosh.

[Anonymous No.12058611]

>>12058582
>a lustful twelve-year-old nymphet
I hate that people keep falling for HH's trickery.

[Anonymous No.12058615]

>>12058582
doesnt look like a real nymphet

i once dated an 18 year old on and off until she was 20 who was a genuine throwback to the nymphet. She was bulimic and had grown up doing ballet, which made her retain that childlike manner of movement, almost catlike, and the body of a 12 year old. When she'd come into my vision my first impression of her was always 'this is a child' which was then replaced by the almost intoxicating beauty of her face, a kind of round pale face,always slightly blushed, with these enormous diamond lips, blue and sand coloured eyes, a very pleasant sort of slope to the entire thing

I can't seem to find actual 12 year olds attractive, largely on account of their being zoomers

[Anonymous No.12058627]

>>12058615
>largely on account of their being zoomers

[Anonymous No.12058639]

>>12058582
The reversal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVIuXOuiYwg

[Anonymous No.12058648]

>>12058627
im being quite serious, it is even impeding in my ability to find 18 year olds hot. I simply can't abide zoomers

whoever came up with that word is a genius btw, they literally do 'zoom' that is their basic way of operating in the world

[Anonymous No.12058650]

You don't have to break any laws to live your lolita fetishes

[Anonymous No.12058665]

>>12058615
>>12058648
Gosh dad, you're such a boomer~

[Anonymous No.12058693]

>>12058665
i am a metaboomer i was already a boomer when i was like 14. This hot girl once told me back then 'youre like an old man, a dirty old man' which is absolutely correct I was, despite being 14. That girl found it and me repulsive but luckily some people are attracted to this appalling thing that has made its home in my body

in my mind there is this leering 65 year old from the antebellum South that took up residence in my psyche at some indeterminate moment of my childhood development and he makes himself felt more or less depending on my level of engagement with the 'modern' side of me which concerns itself with things like Taylor Swift songs but instead of being lecherous and predatory I identify with her vapid meanderings of narcissism and soft pseudo-love emotions as though i were a girl myself

[Anonymous No.12058764]

>>12058611
You are falling for Nabokov's trickery, he's made you think the lustful 12 yr old stuff is all the unreliable narrator when really it's Nabokov himself getting horny

[Anonymous No.12058800]

>>12058764
Lolita isn't lustful or sexy. Even Humbert realizes this by the end of the book.

[Anonymous No.12058810]

>>12058800
>based Nabokov having his cake and eating it
You see *sniff* there is an old joke that the priest on the train is reading Proust, but inside the Proust is concealed a copy of Playboy, *sniff* and the revolutionary sat next to the priest is reading a Playboy, but inside the Playboy he is secretly reading Proust. The reader of Lolita *scratches nose* has a copy of Playboy inside a Proust concealed by a Playboy. Because he would never admit to reading Playboy, so he says 'Don't worry, inside my Playboy is Proust!'
>also implying Lolita isn't sexy

[Anonymous No.12058845]

>>12058810
Only a delusional person would find children, or Lolita, sexy.

[Anonymous No.12058885]

>>12058800
lolita literally initiates the sex with him

[Anonymous No.12058888]

>>12058810
top tier text but also shit tier opinion youre wrong

[Anonymous No.12058934]

>>12058650
imagine fucking her super tight pussy

[Anonymous No.12058948]

>>12058615
So how was it?

>>12058639
Shouldn`t the reverse be /ss/?

[Anonymous No.12058990]

>>12058693
t. self loathing tranner

[Anonymous No.12059010]

>>12058650
I’m not sure how to feel about this.

[Anonymous No.12059015]

>>12058888
Nice digits. Nabby knew writing a straight up pedo fap fantasy wouldn't wash, so he put just enough literary fireworks in there that people would look the other way. He gives the reader plausible deniability, they can tell themselves that really, they bought this Playboy for the John Updike article on page 34, that they're watching this Shirley Temple film for the plot etc