/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12038344]

So frens. How much did you read today?

First book - 2 1/2 piges
Second book - 3 piges
Third book - 7 piges
Fourth book - 6 piges
Fifth book - 1/2 pige
Sixth book - 3 piges

22 piges

[Anonymous No.12038365]

>>12038344
still reading nihil unbound, literally what the fuck is this nigger even talking about. look at this shit:

This is the ‘Great Temptation’ (Badiou 1988: 34, 2006a: 26) to which
philosophers invariably succumb if the denial of the being of unity
and the affirmation of being’s inconsistency is not qualified by the
proviso that there is no immediate, non-discursive access to being, and
circumscribed by the insistence that ontology is a determinate situation;
one in which the un-presentability of inconsistent multiplicity is
rationally encoded in the compositional strictures of set-theoretical
discourse. It is the axiomatic character of ontological presentation
which guarantees that inconsistent multiplicity is inseparable from the
operation of structuring. Consequently, the metaontological concept
of presentation is that of an anti-phenomenon; a split noumenon which
vitiates every form of intellectual intuition insofar as it embodies the
unobjectifiable dehiscence whereby, in exempting itself from the consistency
which it renders possible, structure unleashes the very inconsistency
it is obliged to foreclose. The law of presentation conjoins
the authorization of consistency and the prohibition of inconsistency
in an unpresentable caesura wherein the deployment and subtraction
of structure coincide. Thus the structure of presentation envelops a
strictly ‘non-phenomenologizable’ scission which can only be inscribed
in the formal ideography of set-theory.

[Anonymous No.12038374]

>>12038365
Who knows, I’m glad I’m not reading that shit. Holy fuck

[Anonymous No.12038382]

40 pages of Jane Eyre

Then I read Polaris and Dagon from Lovecraft

[Anonymous No.12038396]

>>12038374
I can actually parse what he's saying because ive been following along the argument since the beginning, but why does he have to fucking say it like that.

[Anonymous No.12038411]

>>12038396
Not sure, but that last line is pretty intriguing and somewhat metaphysical. ‘Formal ideography of Set-theory’

[Anonymous No.12038427]

What’s the point of reading so little of so many books (22 pages lol) and not just dedicate all that effort to 1 or 2 books, and finish those faster than 6.

[Anonymous No.12038482]

>>12038427
I’m reading a chapter per day of these books. Haven’t you seen the other threads of these I’ve made? I’ve read like over 100 pages in some days. Just deends