[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 47 KB, 370x311, Thomas-Ligotti.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11985736 No.11985736 [Reply] [Original]

Why Ligott can't understand that the will of having children or the aim of the life are just inscribed in our dna, and the one is against the nature are not who want to live, but who want to die?
Also: he says that awareness is just a mistake of nature, but nature doesnt' do mistake because the concept of mistake itself is just a human construction, nature doesn't give a fuck about mistakes. If the aim of every being in the universe is to became powerful and expand, awareness is the most powerful fucking gun we have.

>> No.11985791

>>11985736
I don't want to have kids and I don't want to die, what does that say about my DNA, OP?

>> No.11985797

he lacks empathy

>> No.11985814

>>11985791
It says that you need to finish high school and get a job, son.

>> No.11985820

>>11985814
I'm 26 and have a job, anon. I don't see what that has to do with not wanting kids and not wanting to die.

>> No.11985833

>>11985736
>nature doesnt make mistakes
>beings have aims
Pick 1

>> No.11985840

>>11985820
> I'm 26
26 American years is like 13 normal person years.

>> No.11985844

>>11985840
I'm British, anon.

>> No.11985856

In one of his stories he reaches so far into his own asshole for a different word that he comes out with 'vegetation' in reference to a bouquet of flowers. I've read him extensively and this fucking word is all I can remember. I'm honestly not sure who is a worse writer out of him and Lovecraft.
My point is, read him enough and you start to read 'awareness is a mistake of nature' more as plaintive wailing than anything serious. He's not a philosopher, he's the midpoint between Clive Barker and Franz Kafka and a thesaurus.

>> No.11986353

>>11985736
>the aim of the life
>inscribed
>against the nature

Major kill-your-self my friend. I usually just write kys but you deserve it in full.

>> No.11986368

>>11985856
Top lit (living) stylist currently in the burgerland. Go back to Salinger you scum.

>> No.11986427

>>11985833
Are you retarded anon???

>> No.11987343

>>11985833
Mistakes is a concept that nature dont own.
The aim of the beings is being; if you stop to being you are not following what nature wants.

>> No.11987345

>>11985856
Go back to school anon. He say that awareness is a mistake in the consoiracy against human race. If you dont know what we are talking about just lurk kid

>> No.11987358

>>11986353
Oh no another postmodern guy who want to say that nature doesn't matter

>> No.11987574
File: 6 KB, 214x236, 1532210897074.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11987574

>>11985736
>DNA and human nature
OP, I realize you are retarded and just want to justify reproducing (when why not simply justify sex, since the instinctual urge has nothing with bringing offspring to reproductive maturity, themselves, but rather just to engage in the act that logically often creates zygote?), but did you know there are psychosocial behaviors rooted in human genetics that would have you kill your children during lean times so as to better your chances for continued/future survival/fucking? Any urge you have to "reproduce" and actually bring spawn to fruition while the human species has visibly exceeded its environmental carrying capacity by billions is rooted in the social act of telling yourself two things:
>1) I want to possess children.
>2) To want to possess children is good because I can provide resources to them concurrent/superior to my own.
Yet the rationale for your social desire is so statistically unreliable. Your spawn will likely die from disease, wanting, mental illness, or violence.
You dumbass.

>> No.11987649

>>11985736
ligotti lol more like ligma haha