[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 236 KB, 813x1249, 180430_r31962.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971727 No.11971727[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Reads Culture Of Critique once

Serious though, this book is pretty good.

>> No.11971734
File: 1.68 MB, 400x225, 1511615175738.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971734

>reads mein kampf once

>> No.11971736

it's pretty easy to critique a group which has only ever produced critical texts.

>no art
>no creativity
>no inventions
>literally the landlords / rent seekers of civilization

>> No.11971743
File: 27 KB, 306x499, 41OYxBLbBRL._SX304_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971743

>>11971736
Sure

>> No.11971757

>>11971743
the new testament is literally a critique of the old testament.

>> No.11971759

>>11971757
Wasnt it an addition, as the guy said?

>> No.11971761
File: 8 KB, 300x168, indeks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971761

>>11971736

>> No.11971781

>>11971736
>no art
r u on glue f@m?

>> No.11971784

>>11971734
I know, right?

>>11971736
This

>>11971743
The new testament was written in Greek by early church fathers. The Tanakh is possibly from a pre-Hebrew time. The Talmud is Babylonian.

>>11971759
It is an addition, but many see it as a call to return to the Tanahk, and abandon the other parts of the Torah and the Talmud. It is as much a rebuttal as a sequel.

>> No.11971789

>>11971781
They are a little sparse when compared to a great deal of other civilisations. It's hard to say as they are so intertwined with other cultures.

>> No.11971793

>>11971727
> reading works that didn’t pass peer review
Disgusting

>> No.11971798

>>11971789
are you aware of the 20th century?

>> No.11971802

>>11971793
I believe it is quite well regarded scientifically?
Also, if the hypothesis of the work is correct, his (((peers))) are likely not to give it favourible reviews.

>> No.11971804

>>11971798
Elaborate.

>> No.11971816

>>11971802
> scientifically
There isn’t a lick of scientific evidence in it. It’s all just historical instances, and it’s incredibly cherrypicked information.

>> No.11971823
File: 676 KB, 778x1167, hmm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971823

>>11971804
aren't you aware of modern art anon? it's a jewish movement

>> No.11971828

>>11971816
I haven't read much so far, but as I understand it, MacDonald is an Evolutionary Psychologist, not a Geneticist.
He is analysing from a psychological perspective.
He is refuting Freud for example, and Freud hardly used laboratory situated science for his psychology.

>> No.11971834

>>11971823
Yes I am.
So.... where's their contributions to society?

>> No.11971847

>>11971727
Sperg-tastic thread.

>> No.11971850

>>11971828
Criticizing someone isn’t science. It’s critique, hence the fucking title. And it’s still cherrypicked as while Freud was wrong in certain areas his ideas of subconscious are still a staple in psychology. Every thinker has hit and miss ideas anon, Jew or not.

>> No.11971859
File: 1.79 MB, 2225x3300, still learning how to draw hands no bully pls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971859

>>11971834
deconstructing white male patriarchy and colonialist empires, duh.

>> No.11971871

>>11971850
Okay, maybe I used the wrong word when I said "science", maybe I should say it is regarded as reasonable or well argued.
As for Freud and his other examples, I don't think the author says they haven't contributed.
Instead, it's that they have a bent to them that is heavily culturally biased and likely to crowd out other perspectives in the discipline.
Boasian anthropolgy beat out other forms of anthropology.
Freud crowded our other forms of psychoanalysis that are not pathology/deviant based.

>> No.11971872

>>11971757
>>11971784
>The New Testament
It doesn't even come close to the grandeur of the Tanach

>> No.11971874

>>11971859
>Current year
>Still thinks colonialism was bad
>Still thinks patriarchy exists

Either brainlet or pretty high quality satire, anon.

>> No.11971895

>>11971872
Who said grand was the standard of quality culture?
The new testament is what built Christendom anon.

>> No.11971896
File: 308 KB, 640x589, A6A99719-4C75-4E2B-802B-EAEDDDE93F6F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11971896

>>11971871
> criticizing them for not including other groups
> then mentions a group that activity tried to include others to not seem so biased
> criticizing them for try to be inclusive
No one can win in that scenario. He’s literally trying to paint them negatively throughout the entire book, and thus his collegues didn’t approve that mess of a book.

>> No.11971924

>>11971896
I don't get your criticism anon.
What group did the Jews try to include to seem more inclusive?
His whole hypothesis is that they poison the well by turning disciplines into something that benefits them.
Anthropolgy was race based, now it is a faux pas to even bring race into it.
Why? Because the Jews never benefit when their host sees them as "other" so they must learn to abandon their identity.

>> No.11971935

>>11971924
The communist party was taking anyone with a pulse, anyway the big gripe is that that is simply not true. Thousands of Jews have done things without ever thinking about how it would benefit their culture because not everyone has some weird tribal loyalty to their heritage.

>> No.11971971

>>11971935
>without thinking
That's the point anon, he beleives it is built into their socioty, culture and psychology.
And the upper echelons of the Commie Party were 85% Jews. They are a minority group, they cannot ever dominate a whole sector, they are drawn to occupying the top tier positions.