[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 7 KB, 226x223, SPOOK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11896076 No.11896076 [Reply] [Original]

What is your perspective on Max Stirner?

>> No.11896089

>>11896076
Pairs well with Kierkegaard

>> No.11896103

>>11896076
Spooky

>> No.11896218

>>11896103
How does this guy manage to trigger everyone?

>> No.11896231

Interesting enough as philosophy.
Makes everyone mad as heck who know him and obscure enough so most plebs don't know him.
Also easy to interpret yourself because "lol my Ego is above that shit" and highly memeable.

>> No.11896261

>>11896076
he cute!

>> No.11896542

>>11896076
Doesn't understand that existence is not a predicate which means that he can be safely disregarded.

>> No.11896716

>>11896542
Spooks

>> No.11897370

he's pretty silly

>> No.11897377

>>11896076
The essential nihilist

>> No.11898403

>>11896076
>perspective
I think I'm staring at their ass.

>> No.11898419

>>11896076
I like him, too bad this board just makes him into hipster Ayn Rand.

>> No.11898869

Didn't see coming ending his book as pretty much a socialist.

>> No.11898911

Can someone explain how you can appreciate spooks as long as you are conscious you are doing it your own egotism? How am I supposed to learn what my ego wants?

>> No.11898987

>>11898911
You could just read into absurdism, and appreciate everything for what it is. Rather than worrying about your ego

>> No.11899842

he should be talked about more past the meme of the spook. Honesty with how /lit/ talks about Whitehead, Deleuze, Land and other nowadays, I feel in some ways Stirner could fit in well in some areas. (rhizomes contrasted with The union of egoists ; Process philosophy contrasted with the Creative Nothing and so on)

>> No.11900106

>>11896089
nietzsche + kierkegaard with a dose of stirner is the ultimate existential stew

>> No.11900331

there's no real argument against him because he's right about everything

>> No.11900344 [DELETED] 

Dicks are so cute omg ( •ω• ) when you hold one in your hand and it starts twitching its like its nuzzling you(/ω＼) or when they perk up and look at you like" owo nya? :3c" hehe ~ penis-kun is happy to see me!!(＾ワ＾)and the most adorable thing ever is when sperm-sama comes out but theyre rlly shy so u have to work hard!!(๑•̀ㅁ•́๑) but when penis-kun and sperm-sama meet and theyre blushing and all like "uwaaa~!" (ﾉ´ヮ´)ﾉ: ･ﾟhehehe~penis-kun is so adorable (●´Д｀●)・::・

>> No.11900375

>>11896076
Stirner never existed, he was actually another Kierkegaard pen name he used to shitpost for a German audience

>> No.11900377

>>11896076
He is my property

>> No.11900492

>>11896076
too many liberals and """anarchists""" using his imagery and aesthetic, same as marxism/socialism/communism and a lot of things. he's easy to read and fun. nothing much deep to it but surely better than most """"""philosophy"""""" especially the established stuff. i think stirner's core ideas are meant to be building blocks to combine with other things and manipulate/refine. he seems to work well with nearly anything, i think that is a mark of legitimate thought, it's not so much some plain doctrine or facts or 'this is how things are', just some solid 'really made me think' and highly adaptable concepts. i think wide, unique, and personal adaption seemingly beyond the scope of stirner's own thinking is actually the epitome of stirner's thinking.

>>11896218
dunno but 'leftists' seem to get hung up on that mongoloid/europid/negroid bit. it's pretty funny how their programming instantly takes hold and they revert to stock outrage lines. ive seem them pedantically mull over stirner's 'bigotry' with malice while spouting one-liners about spooks. they never seem to pierce, even slightly, below their baseline memes that they've not even seriously thought about to begin with (that's the starting point, they've not done anything). sometimes that can be disheartening.

>> No.11900668

>>11896076
Nick Land destroyed him

>> No.11900761

>>11900668
Who

>> No.11900766

>>11896076
based

>> No.11900767

I don't know...

>> No.11900997

St. Max was a moron.

>> No.11901009
File: 14 KB, 338x600, 1538668076028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901009

>>11896076
>What is your perspective on Max Stirner?
2 dimensional

>> No.11901088

>>11900668
You guys keep saying this. How? Where/When?

>> No.11901093

>>11896076
I seem to be viewing him in profile

>> No.11901875
File: 60 KB, 496x396, 53904.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901875

good meme material

>> No.11901888

His philosophy is cute but totally impracticable. His idea of a Union of Egoists sounds like something a cool teen would name their band. In practice it makes no sense since you'd end up with a bunch of warring narcissists trying to assert that each other's belongings is "my property." It would be comedy.

Philosophically speaking he's an amusing little boy and little else.

>> No.11901903
File: 14 KB, 680x489, 1400469162940.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11901903

The Menace of Marx
The Crusher of Communism
The Killer of Karl

>> No.11901925

>>11901888
lol faggot

>> No.11901949

>>11901875
>worshiping evolution
why do creationists honestly think this? I have a strong grasp of evolutionary biology and haven't read about evolution in any serious way for years. if anything, I "worship" a variety of ideologies and pursuits.

>> No.11902003
File: 26 KB, 351x434, 10929130.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11902003

>>11901949
creationists are retards what else is new

>> No.11902312

>>11901093
topkek underrated comment

>> No.11902333

He's surprisingly a subtle thinker. Probably one of the most self-aware philosophers. Takes on concepts with wit and irony. He's sarcastic and seems like he's having fun.

>> No.11902347

This thread was moved to >>>/his/5459742