What are the best critiques of Proudhon's work?

[Anonymous No.11880309]

pls bros.

[Anonymous No.11881966]

Not Marx's that's for sure.

[Anonymous No.11881990]

Looking out the window

[Anonymous No.11882011]

>>11880309
who do ya think? Blows him out at the beginning of the book.

[Anonymous No.11882355]

>>11882011
egoism is self-defeating.
also, I recently found that this drawing was done by Engels!

[Anonymous No.11882665]

>>11880309
Literally the only criticisms are reactionary criticisms

[Anonymous No.11884109]

>>11880309
He cute

[Anonymous No.11884214]

>>11882355
>egoism is self-defeating
Elaborate.

[Anonymous No.11885210]

>>11884214
man is a social creature. Living in packs can be hard, but figuring out how to do it well is basically the great human adventure.
I wasn't going to reply cause I don't wanna argue about this, but this thread refuses to die, so, there.

[Anonymous No.11885233]

>>11882011
>she bought into the Stirner meme

[Anonymous No.11885253]

>>11885233
>xhe thinks that because i post something, i agree with it
oh you sweet summer child

[Anonymous No.11885732]

>>11882665
He has mostly be certified by other leftists, especially Marx, because he dared propose an alternative to capitalism, however flawed, while the former thought there was no point trying to define a possible socialist society.

[Anonymous No.11886579]

>>11880309
Poverty of philosophy
>>11881966
This but ironically.

[Anonymous No.11886618]

>>11885210
in no way does Stirner argue against that, the union of egoists and all that

[Anonymous No.11887123]

>>11886618
the idea is an oxymoron. the basis of communion is sacrifice.

[Anonymous No.11887136]

>>11880309
Deleuze invalidated his theories

[Anonymous No.11887403]

>>11885253
Wouldn't it be terrible for your case if you plainly stated you were convinced by him in your post?

[Anonymous No.11887409]

>>11880309
Walter Block.

[Anonymous No.11887422]

>>11881966
people that don't value marxs brilliant polemics are pathetic nerds

[Anonymous No.11887423]

He was a famous anti-semite if you hold that sort of thing against people
>Abolish synagogues and not admit them to any employment. Finally, pursue the abolition of this religion. It’s not without cause that the Christians called them deicidal. The Jew is the enemy of humankind. They must be sent back to Asia or be exterminated. By steel or by fire or by expulsion the Jew must disappear.

[Anonymous No.11887463]

>hey /lit/ I got btfo in an argument pls help

[Anonymous No.11887521]

>>11881966
>>11886579
>>11887422
I feel like marx's critique boils down to "I'm better than Proudhon". He thinks his writings on capitalism are the end-all and different approaches or different emphases are of no value.
For example, the fact that Proudhon tackles property as a legal construct is, to Marx, totally unimportant, what he should've been talking about is relations of production, which is what he himself talks about. But clearly this does matter to society at large, and proving that property doesn't make sense as a legal construct is very meaningful.

>>11887463
it really is more for my own sanity. I didn't go into it with any expectation that I would actually come to lose respect for the concept of private property, even for a vaguely leftist person, that seems too radical, but, well...