Lacan Reading Group?

[Anonymous No.11863679]

Would anyone here be genuinely interesting in doing some sort of Lacan reading group, in a similar vein to the Anti-Oedipus one that existed for a bit? I thought just by picking some excerpts, perhaps a chapter from The Ethics of Psychoanalysis or something, and discussing it could be interesting. Don't really think there's as much of an interest in Lacan here along the same lines as Deleuze, but from the threads on Anti-Oedipus it seemed like there was a number of people here who knew what they were talking about.

[Anonymous No.11863685]

No thanks.

[Anonymous No.11863692]

why not read contemporary cognitive science instead of frenchie voodoo?

[Anonymous No.11863695]

i'm interested, but 4chan isn't the place and anywhere else ends up sucking dick, is what i've learned
if you can do it seriously i'll hop in

[Anonymous No.11863718]

>>11863679
Yeah sure, sounds interesting. Just got a copy, will get around to reading by tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.11863722]

>>11863679
I'd be interested but I need to read more philosophy. What should I read in order to understand Lacan?

[Anonymous No.11863723]

>>11863692
Not op, but what did you have in mind?

[Anonymous No.11863740]

>>11863723
https://predictive-mind.net/press

[Anonymous No.11863766]

can we please do this? I've always wanted to make it 5 pages into Ecrits

[Anonymous No.11863782]

So what, is /lit/ working its way backward through the history of psychoanalysis?
Also I'm in if this is happening

[Anonymous No.11863813]

What do we start with? I'll join and help keep threads alive

[Anonymous No.11863896]

We have to start with a Hegel reading group and then move on to Freud because linking up with Lacan.

[Anonymous No.11863904]

>>11863896
>Hegel reading group
Reminder the AO reading group made it 8 pages in 5 threads

[Anonymous No.11863948]

>>11863904
Same with the Anti-Oedipus thread. Anyone want to take bets on how far we get into Lacan?

[Anonymous No.11864000]

can't we just make some telegram or discord server? otherwise activity would be annoying to follow and hard to trace into a particular lad
also, i hope the reading is uncritical, as otherwise we'd get stuck soon and often, the idea would be—i hope—to learn what he has to say, not to engage with, not immediately, at least. i'd assume you people have to ability to do that without getting swayed into agreement

[Anonymous No.11864087]

Level 83 Lacanian here. Id be glad to help out if you guys have any questions about the text.

[Anonymous No.11864130]

>>11864087
Sokal and Bricmont BTFO'd by that Chad hair

[Anonymous No.11864142]

>>11864000
i agree with this. i think a discord server would be much more effective to form a solid group reading.
i am very interested in lacan, but sadly i dont think i would be able to grasp his ideas without the necessary background.

[Anonymous No.11864158]

*Blocks your reading group*

[Anonymous No.11864208]

>>11864000
>>11864142
Whats the difference? Just post here. Use a trip if you have to

[Anonymous No.11864489]

>>11864208
main difference is that i may lose the ability to keep contact with someone passionate about the same things i am, which is a non-argument
>>11864087
what's a good place to start with him for all of us?
and what're the seminars where he talks about joyce, trakl and cybernetics? those i'm interested in, and the concept of jouissance

[Anonymous No.11864528]

bump

[Anonymous No.11864649]

bump?

[Anonymous No.11864699]

Can this double as the Tao Lin reading group?

[Anonymous No.11864724]

>When Lacan discovered how aggressive the book was with respect to his ideas, all the bridges were definitively burned. Not only would the two never see each other gain, but Lacan and his friends also started circulating a series of rumors about Guattari’s practice to discredit him in the psychoanalytic circles.

>When “Anti-Oedipus” was finally published, Lacan censored any discussion of the book among his students. He forbade any debate about the book, and never mentioned it in his seminar. One student of Lacan noted that Lacan took “Anti-Oedipus” as “a personal attack that was all the more hurtful because he had made some gestures towards Deleuze, whom he respected.”

Who was in the wrong here?

[Anonymous No.11864748]

guys please, did i get excited for naught?

[Anonymous No.11864788]

>>11864724
LACAN

[Anonymous No.11864797]

Let's just start on the Seminars. Any objections?

The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)

[Anonymous No.11864812]

>>11863685
>>11863692
>Letting the Other spook you into not reading Lacan

[Anonymous No.11864815]

>>11864724
Lacan; AO actually isn't all that hard on him, not like Freud and Jung at least.

[Anonymous No.11864819]

>>11864797
non on my end, i guess, but should we read it whole for a set date?

[Anonymous No.11864919]

>>11864797
This picture isn't sexual. It's like she is an angel leading you on the right path, and when fleshbags try to lead you astray, she turns around and sincerely urges you not to and to instead stay with her.
My friends. When you see the sexual images in real life or in a dream. Don't look at them. You won't get to your destination if you do. It's even worse if you operate under the assumption that there is no God, because all that's left is a primal region of the brain trying to usurp the primacy of the prefrontal cortex. Renounce the flesh in its entirety or you'll be a slave the rest of your days.

[Anonymous No.11865153]

>>11864919
>Don't appreciate the most beautiful thing in the universe

No

[Anonymous No.11865163]

What are we going to read?

[Anonymous No.11865513]

>>11865163
Ecrits

[Anonymous No.11865874]

>>11865163
Not Lacan. He's a hack that throws autistic fits when speaking. Watch a YouTube video of him. Such a disgusting freak. If someone tried to lecture me in such a way, I'd walk out. Weirdo.

[Anonymous No.11865903]

>>11865874
lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mImbHxmMmdE