[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 22 KB, 246x400, C289E498-3325-4F6D-A1D7-A9AAE8D0CEE2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11742772 No.11742772 [Reply] [Original]

So is Object Oriented Ontology really that groundbreaking? Seems like the new thing in continental philosophy...so I’m told.

>> No.11742854
File: 681 KB, 1895x1272, comfy14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11742854

>>11742772
From wikipedia, the subject looks interesting. I have always suspected that disciplines like phenomenology should not start with the human subject, because by starting thus you will never reach the outside world. Rather, you should start with something a little less certain but that will allow you to reach more.

>> No.11742862
File: 53 KB, 350x470, s-l300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11742862

>>11742772
Is he actually taking Software terminology and trying to chucklefuck a philosophy out of it

>> No.11742870

>denies correlationism
>still keeps doing philosophy

pseudcore

>> No.11743266

>>11742772
It's basically just continental philosophy finally catching up with the analytics

>> No.11743277

>>11743266
More like trying to understand what analytics knew all along.

>> No.11743293

Functional Ontology is better.

>> No.11743311

https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=chiasmaasiteforthought

Good article debunking OOO as bad philosophy written by dilettantes. I'd bet money that people who think they are adherents of OOO can't even understand this article in order to appreciate the critique, which goes a long way to show who is really backing this trash.

>> No.11743560

>>11743311
What the fuck happened to phenomenology? Sometimes they release papers literally about the philosophy of the asshole and now they're trying their hardest to mimic daddy(analytic philosophy). What a fucking shitshow.