/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.11701653]

Whats wrong with neoliberalism?

[Anonymous No.11701658]

Literally nothing. It just makes leftists and rightists mad since they dont actually have anything to offer

[Anonymous No.11701660]

>>11701653
What's wrong with Neoconservatism?

[Anonymous No.11701661]

>>11701653
Literally nothing
>Inb4 /leftypol/ and /pol/ starts spamming

[Anonymous No.11701662]

>>11701658
fpbp

[Anonymous No.11701668]

>>11701658
>>11701661
>>11701662
when contrarianism goes too far

[Anonymous No.11701672]

>>11701653
It's the demosharts version of republican neokikery.

[Anonymous No.11701677]

something something non-places

[Anonymous No.11701680]

>>11701672
nice buzzwords but unfortunately you need to return to >>>/pol/
"kike" is a racial slur and racism is not allowed on this board.

[Anonymous No.11701682]

free movement of labour means lower wages, until there is "balance"

[Anonymous No.11701691]

>>11701680
>ad-hom'd right off the bat
get fucking checkm8'd

[Anonymous No.11701694]

depends what you mean by 'neoliberalism'

[Anonymous No.11701704]

>>11701653
Consumerism, it ruins culture. but I don't really really see how that is exclusively neoliberalism fault and more so liberal capitalism in general, neoliberalism is just one brand of it with not only consumerism but globalism as well, which essentially melts all true cultures, ethnicities and uniqueness into one giant pot of cultureless consumerism.

[Anonymous No.11701705]

>>11701653
it’s neoconservatism for fags

delian league 2.0 fucking when

[Anonymous No.11701706]

>>11701691
>"neoliberalism is kikery"
>"racism isn't allowed here"
>wtf?!?!?! debate my argument you idiot libshit
/pol/ will never ever be respected

[Anonymous No.11701709]

>>11701705
Neoconservatism and neoliberalism aren't even comparable, one is a political ideology, one is an economic one. You can literally be both.

[Anonymous No.11701710]

>>11701653
It's the antithesis of the human spirit.

[Anonymous No.11701719]

>>11701694
do you want the real definition or the /pol/ definition?

[Anonymous No.11701720]

>>11701710
More like it appeals to the most base of the human spirit.

[Anonymous No.11701727]

>>11701720
The base of the human spirit is the irrational, animal spirit. Not the same as the human spirit

[Anonymous No.11701728]

>80% of Americans wealth is in the hands of 20% of the boomers
>60% of the 80% is in the hands of 5% of the 20%
>Hurr durr what's wrong with this

[Anonymous No.11701742]

>>11701719
Depends which one the OP meant

[Anonymous No.11701749]

[Anonymous No.11701750]

>>11701728
fuck off pinko, life aint fair

[Anonymous No.11701751]

>>11701728
>money is wealth

[Anonymous No.11701754]

I'd have a go at Elle Reeve and I don't care who knows it. I'd wear a MAGA hat during.

[Anonymous No.11701755]

>>11701727
The highest of the human spirit is also irrational, nothing can be without irrationality.

[Anonymous No.11701761]

>>11701728
>gibs me dat

[Anonymous No.11701762]

>>11701761
>maybe if I lick their boots hard enough massa will give me the table scraps

[Anonymous No.11701764]

>>11701749
Do commies actually believe this?

[Anonymous No.11701765]

>>11701762
shut the fuck up commie, it's going to trickle down soon and it'll be fucking YUUUUUUUUUUUUGE

[Anonymous No.11701771]

>>11701749
t. r/latestagecapitalism

[Anonymous No.11701774]

>>11701762
>too weak to take what he wants for himself
>has to appeal to "equality" and "fairness"

[Anonymous No.11701777]

>>11701764
>>11701771
t. seething neoliberals with no arguments

[Anonymous No.11701790]

>>11701774
I'm not even a commie tho and I don't believe equality or fairness are necessarily good

[Anonymous No.11701793]

>>11701762
>N-NO!!! we are the ones who deserve free things, we are superior since we were powerless to oppress!

[Anonymous No.11701803]

>>11701777

[Anonymous No.11701808]

>>11701793
What are you, a fucking libertarian or Randian or something? Do you seriously believe that capitalism favours the aristocrats of the soul?

Why don't you go read what Junger, Heidegger, Feder, Schmitt, or a billion other actual spiritual aristocrats thought of capitalism, of bourgeois "accumulation?"

[Anonymous No.11701818]

>>11701790
Then shut the fuck arguing you imbecile.

[Anonymous No.11701822]

>>11701803
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAS QUEEN
COMMIES GET DABBED ON

[Anonymous No.11701824]

reminder

[Anonymous No.11701829]

>>11701818
Yeah nah cunt

[Anonymous No.11701830]

>>11701824
The how socialism thinks it works should both be green.

[Anonymous No.11701834]

>>11701653
Pic sauce?

[Anonymous No.11701836]

Joke: Capitalism creates actual poverty
Woke: Capitalism creates spiritual poverty

[Anonymous No.11701837]

>>11701829
fuck off pinko greeny faggot

[Anonymous No.11701841]

>>11701837
*sells soul for money*

[Anonymous No.11701842]

>>11701834
It that dopey journalist bitch who flirted with Richard Spencer will interviewing him with the "Golden One's" eyes shopped onto her.

[Anonymous No.11701845]

>>11701808
yeah i know im just participating in a thread with the only input i know about. the only economic theory i know is usury stuff.

[Anonymous No.11701846]

>>11701841
>sells soul for jamal

[Anonymous No.11701850]

>>11701846
>/pol/ thinks if you're anti-capitalism you must be pro-globalization/pro-internationalism
Lmao and you're on a literature board too

[Anonymous No.11701857]

>>11701803
None of those examples are late stage capitalism. ffs were you at the late stage capitalism thread we had yesterday?

[Anonymous No.11701861]

ITT Neoshillbrals

Neoliberalism is, naturally enough, an incomplete doctrine. It is by no means the final word on human economic evolution or development, nor are its premises recognized by economists to be eternal truths derivable from first principles.

Rather, neoliberalism is simply a doctrine and legal structure devised by the ultrarich business elite, to establish global conditions for their continued enhanced prosperity. If it so happens that other people benefit or lose out from these arrangements directly or indirectly, well, you see, that's just the "invisible hand" of the market.

Neoliberalism isn't about free markets, its about sham free markets where adversely concentrated monopolies of wealth determine the contours of the system.

To have true free markets, paradoxically you need government interventionism, not market anarchy which is really a cover for monopoly market control.

[Anonymous No.11701874]

>>11701824
trickle-down economics is a sham

[Anonymous No.11701880]

Why do Americans constantly feel the need to discuss politics on a literature board?

[Anonymous No.11701883]

It has no values. It has no room for projects, whether they are local, national or global of how is best for us to live, they are considered barriers to this "freedom".

[Anonymous No.11701897]

>>11701836
/thread

[Anonymous No.11701898]

*blocks your path*

[Anonymous No.11701927]

[Anonymous No.11701956]

>>11701830
Can you give me an example of a wealthy socialist country? I would legitimately like to know.

[Anonymous No.11701963]

>>11701956
Ahhhh I'm not a socialist, I was talking about the "how socialists THINK socialism works one"