[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 82 KB, 907x1360, ligotti.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11699730 No.11699730 [Reply] [Original]

Is this book any good?

>> No.11699828

Bump

>> No.11699912

Read some of it and it was pretty enjoyable. I've heard it described as "philosophical horror" which ended up being pretty spot on. It's a bit wanky but that's pretty much what makes it good. He made a really interesting point partway in I recall, about how conceptualizing the afterlife as an eternal nothingness or as an eternal existence in some other modality are more or less equivalent beliefs that are both used to try and create value for this life in the here and now, even though both outcomes are equally unintelligible

>> No.11700088

>>11699730
I read it while going through a period of far too frequent DXM use and it sent me into a major existential crisis

>> No.11700823

It's basically a collection of pessimist thinkers and their ideas. So, in that regard it's completely satisfactory -it's does exactly what it sets out to do.
Gets people really butt blasted for some reason, though.

>> No.11701334
File: 679 KB, 520x960, Reviewbrahh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11701334

>>11699730
It's an emotional reaction so it can't be debated.

He puts on the darkest sunglasses and refuses to take them off after tripping on cat shit. Reducing his world view that the whole world must be dark and smell like cat shit.

>> No.11701356

>>11699730
No. Read Cioran if you have to, but both are hypocritical faggots.

>> No.11701371
File: 55 KB, 299x450, penguin a conspiracy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11701371

what were they tinking?

>> No.11701377

>>11699730
No.

>> No.11701390

That cover reeks of 'tism.

>> No.11701541

>>11701356
In any case they are aware of their hypocrisy, and I feel that really lessens this point.
>>11699730
The chapter on Shakespeare and the use of supernatural horror in literature is legitimately great literary criticism.

>> No.11702852

>I came from First Who Was Sent, that I might reveal to you Him Who Is from the Beginning, because of the arrogance of Arch-Begetter and his angels, since they say about themselves that they are gods. And I came to remove them from their blindness, that I might tell everyone about the God who is above the universe. Therefore, tread upon their graves, humiliate their malicious intent, and break their yoke and arouse my own. I have given you authority over all things as Sons of Light, that you might tread upon their power with your feet."

>> No.11702875

I've been through worse and my health is worse than Stephen King's underdeveloped discount clone here and I'm thankful for this life. The world isn't the problem. He is.

>> No.11702940

>>11699730
I found it waaay too analytical. But if you like that style, it's pretty good.

The preface/introduction were the best part of my reading.

>> No.11702953

>>11699730
>edgetheist
No thanks.

>> No.11702958
File: 274 KB, 1600x1067, The vulture and the little girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11702958

M A L I G N A N T L Y U S E L E S S

>> No.11702981

>>11699730
Ligotti is the greatest living horror writer.

>> No.11702997

>>11702875
>Thomas Ligotti
>Stephen King's underdeveloped discount clone
One of the stupidest criticisms I've ever read on here. Ligotti's prose is far better than King's and Ligotti's work is all about nihilistic dread/pessimism whereas King tends to write about his personal issues. Like The Shining is very blatantly about his alcoholism and works like IT are fueled by his childhood. Also, when Ligotti cooks up cosmic horror he sticks to Lovecraft's "humanity is insignificant and doomed" view whereas King's cosmic horror creations are usually defeatable. Comparing Ligotti to Lovecraft makes a lot more sense than comparing him to King.

>> No.11703001

>>11699730
Seems like this just makes people want to kill themselves. What's the point if I'm already sad

>> No.11703018
File: 48 KB, 488x267, mailkirstybamuheadline2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11703018

>>11702875
>existentially cucked optimist that doesn't suffer from depression thinks he is worse off and even capable of having a worldview approaching objectivity

>> No.11703022

>>11702875
>>11702997
I almost forgot to mention that Ligotti always keeps his stories short and knows how to properly end them whereas King loves to pump out 800+ page novels that have disappointing endings.

>> No.11703078

>>11702875
Wow, what a shitty criticism.

>> No.11703126

>>11702958
Atleast we can take consolation in the fact the vulture gained more pleasure by devouring the carcass than the kid suffered anguish.

>> No.11703136

>>11703126
you joke but normies actually think like this

>> No.11703140

>>11703136
I dont think that normies think about it at all

>> No.11703146

>>11701390
your post reeks of pseud

>> No.11703337

his book of interviews is a better look into his real thoughts

>> No.11703344

>>11703126
true, the overall happiness in the world increase, so whatever...

>> No.11703364

>Renounce all unknowing, that ye may be worthy of the mysteries of the Light and be saved from the servitors of Yaldabaōth and the fire-seas.

>> No.11703870

>>11703126
unironically this. that vulture has a life too

>> No.11705010

>>11703337
Thomas Ligotti isn't real.
Everything he writes or says or does as Thomas Ligotti is fictional and part of his mythos.
It appalls me that idiots do not realize this.
There are no "real thoughts". Those are fictional thoughts.
>>11702981
>Ligotti is the greatest living horror writer.
This.
He's so good he's convinced droves of edgelords and dimwits into believing the horror is real.

>> No.11705023

>>11702997
I was making a joke about how they look kind of similar and they're both horror writers but Ligpouti looks like a flabby version of King. I wasn't comparing their writing style.

>> No.11705029

>>11703078
That isn't even a counterargument.

>> No.11705042

>>11703018
You and people like you are just insufferable faggots. Now please whine more in your attempt to assail that obviously bonafide statement of fact as you're only providing further evidence in its support.