[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 2 KB, 163x209, 1485220337131.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666233 No.11666233[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

So, if everything men do is in service of sexual conquest; to impress women, to reproduce, to become attractive to women ... that must mean that women, being the ultimate arbiters of sexual approval, we also contain within that faculty the capability of aesthetic adjudicator.

Everything you do is in service of women.

Even your shitposting.

What literature captures this fact best?

>Literature for this feel?

>> No.11666276

>if everything men do is in service of sexual conquest, to impress women
No

>> No.11666307

>>11666276
This, op is idiot

>> No.11666325

>>11666276
Then what is it for? It's own sake? Don't make me laugh.

>> No.11666328

1. Click Settings (bottom/top of page)

2. Click Filters & Post Hiding

3. Toggle and Edit "Filter and highlight specific threads/posts"

4. Toggle "On", "Auto", and "Hide". Leave "Boards" empty. Then enter a pattern:

For namefags, add this (as type "Name"):

Name

For tripfags utilizing ordinary tripcodes add this (as type "Tripcode"):

!METS.GNIWQ

For tripfags utilizing secure tripcodes add this (as type "Tripcode"):

!!6Gk3cvqPqbL

You can also filter tripfags on a name-basis. This will allow your filter to persist even though they switch username passwords.

5. Click "Save" and "Save Settings".

>> No.11666332

>>11666328
You can't filter these dubs

>> No.11666349
File: 278 KB, 549x823, peacock-feathers-extra-tall-35-40-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666349

>>11666233
That's lowering man to the level of peacocks.

>> No.11666380
File: 238 KB, 600x351, 792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666380

No, it's not in service. Men's quest for status is a miniature version of man's mission to dominate nature. Eradicate scarcity by means of (in the local case) money and power.

>> No.11666417

>>11666233
>women, being the ultimate arbiters of sexual approval
No, patriarchy used to be a thing
>also contain within that faculty the capability of aesthetic adjudicator.
Non sequitur

tl;dr KYS ESL tripfag

>> No.11666419

Just be gay. Problem solved

>> No.11666487

>>11666233
switch women with man, and then what, is it not also true? Everything women do is to get and keep a man. Considering that then, would you not think that there are more activities that men do that are 'cool and interesting in and of themselves' that even if women did not exist, if men were immortal robots or spirits, that they would pursue art and sport and games because one needs to do something with the time, and there are pleasant and interesting ways to pass it? What would women do in that situation? Nails, make up, clothes, dolls, reading sex tips in cosmo, gossip, what else do women do?

>> No.11666497

>>11666487
Women are defacto attractive by virtue of being female. So, no.

>> No.11666507

>>11666233
We've renounced the flesh here.
Renounce the flesh. Temper your desires while lessening your appetite. Lessen your labors and remain in your cell.

>> No.11666512

>>11666497
You're on the wrong board, kid. We're against women here, and we believe that they aren't capable of doing anything authentic. We believe they only do stuff for 'Chad'.
Now you're saying that it's actually men who can't be authentic? Heh, not on my fucking watch. This will not be tolerated. We are better than women, more virtuous, capable of real thought and endeavour, whereas women are barely more conscious than rocks. Try the redpill

>> No.11666515

>>11666497
You didnt answer my questions though.
>Women are defacto attractive
then why do so many wear makeup everyday?

What are some things women do that are not about attracting men? besides horsebackriding maybe (though im sure we can think of how that relates to attracting men)

>> No.11666518

>>11666507
>my virginity is MY choice, it's not because no one would ever find me loveable
state of incels lmao

>> No.11666524

>>11666487
It's because of the fact women only need to rely on looks and sexual appeal that they don't need to think abstractly.

>> No.11666533

>>11666518
What he mentions is a common practice in buddhism

>> No.11666538

>>11666533
When it's coming from fat anime-watching 'vidya' game playing losers, it seems less authentic

>> No.11666547

>>11666538
How do you know he is? how do I know you aren't either? I'm probably one too as far as you know

>> No.11666560

>>11666547
I haven't 'had to' renounce anything

>> No.11666579

>>11666325

It is for it's own sake.

Laugh tripfag, laugh.

>>11666328

Thanks anon!

>> No.11666584

>>11666233
>we also contain within that faculty the capability of aesthetic adjudicator.
Does not follow. Shit thread, poor bait. Retire your trip, dummy.

>> No.11666597
File: 23 KB, 479x317, 1482510748902.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666597

>>11666515
Because women exist in a hierarchy of attractiveness. Surely you're not so naive and beguiled by the ways of woman you can't perceive the existence of such a thing, and infer the properties implicit to it.

Perhaps so.

>> No.11666603

also, OP, I'll give you something to think about with that lefty-poisoned peabrain:

What about men who have forsaken women by the vow of chastity? Is everything THEY do in service to women? Or in service to God? And if it is to God, who is the highest beauty, doesn't that make woman's beauty into a tempter and object of false virtue? Who are you to proclaim yourself the ultimate arbiter of what is Good?

Please, fuck off.

>> No.11666613

>>11666603
>volcel myth
Most priests aren't celibate given the pedophile cases.

>> No.11666615

>>11666603
>What about men who have forsaken women by the vow of chastity?
You haven't forsaken anyone. They're relieved.
>Is everything THEY do in service to women?
Yes

>> No.11666626

>>11666613
Unsubstantiated conjecture.

>> No.11666638

>>11666603
They've been possessed by an idea, or meme, so to speak, and they operate in service to those who are willingly participating in the genetic race.

Otherwise they starve to death, they simply fall off the treadmill and their genetic code is lost forever.

A triumphant victory over all woman kind, I'm certain.

>> No.11666655
File: 14 KB, 467x433, moegjge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666655

>>11666638
>people of faith and an interior life are possessed by a meme
enjoy your suffering, dummy

>> No.11666657

>>11666597
>Women are defacto attractive by virtue of being female
Then why do so many wear make up?
>Because women exist in a hierarchy of attractiveness.

>Women are defacto attractive by virtue of being female
Then why do so many wear make up?

What are some things women do that are not in the service of trying to be desirable for am man?

>> No.11666664

>>11666638
If you had the choice, would you rather be a woman or a man, why?

>> No.11666672

>>11666655
>incel
>anime
lol, we both know what kind of life you're leading

>> No.11666684

>>11666657
Women aren't all equally attractive all the time, you fucking moron.

Jesus, men are idiots. Can't even understand simple hierarchical distribution analyses.

>> No.11666698

>>11666233
absolute brainlet

you think people castrate themselves or commit suicide for the purpose of sex?

>> No.11666728
File: 135 KB, 375x375, 1514772340726.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666728

>>11666698
I think human brains are susceptible to memetic information viruses which can distort their perceptions of reality to the point they fail to compete successfully and die without having reproduced.

>> No.11666740

>>11666684
kek, how embarrassing. this thread is crumbling in your delicate op-ed writing art hoe #noshamefist hands. what even is the premise of this stupid bait thread? "men exist to please women." okay? i mean ultimately that is partly correct. the sexes exist to continue each other. but aesthetics does not come to the argument except to crown men with glory. women as art critic are simply receptacles of male efforts, as usual.

I'm curious... what do you think of a woman like Asia Argento? Clearly a sociopath, capable of feeling but only interested in itself, uses and abuses others regularly without shame or a second thought, implicates an ex who necked himself in order to shift blame away from her own crime.

This is a dumb thread and you should feel dumb for sincerely posting under your trip.

>> No.11666741

>>11666728
thats a fancy way of saying yes, my premise is false, and it is in fact possible for men to do things that are not in service of sexual conquest, impressing women, reproduction, being attractive, &c

>> No.11666763

>>11666741
I assumed you agreed that without successful reproduction you're a failure as a man, but I guess you don't consider that presupposition tenable.

How convenient for you.

>> No.11666764

>girl tries to make thread
>her OP is full of sophistry
>gets downvoted to oblivion
no, this does not mean /lit/ = r/MGTOW or is full of men's rights activists. it means your ideas are bad.

>> No.11666813

>>11666763
irrelevant to the claim in your OP
>a failure is defined as X
>all men's acts are motivated by Z
these are separate matters

>> No.11666820

>>11666684
>Women aren't all equally attractive all the time, you fucking moron.
But most wear make up
>you fucking moron.
you were to moronic to grasp that was my point

I guess I shouldn't have said: why do SO MANY, I guess I should have said, why do MOST

How often do you wear make up you defacto attractive betch?

>> No.11666851

>>11666820
Only ugly girls wear makeup. You should know, you've seen your mother.

>> No.11666852

>>11666684
>If you had the choice, would you rather be a woman or a man, why?
answer this please

>> No.11666872

>>11666851
Most women wear make up, but ok. I guess your answer equals you never wear make up, but you couldn't just say that for some reason.

How many kids do you plan on having?

Would you rather be a great artistic/inventor/rich genius who doesnt have any kids, or a 65 iq redneck that works their whole life at walmart never leaving their population 2000 middle america town that has a few kids?

I agree with your reproduction sentiments generally, but that is still an interesting question you must admit

>> No.11666887

>>11666852
Doesn't seem to matter, as long as I have my immense intellect and my stellar good looks it wouldn't bother me either way.

>> No.11666914
File: 92 KB, 562x482, kermitlaughing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11666914

>>11666887
an actual good looking person would not have made this cope thread

also please answer these posts:
>>11666740
>>11666584
>>11666813
Your argument doesn't actually make sense. You're either trolling (and winning) or sincere (and stupid).

>> No.11666947

>>11666332
epyc fayl...haha wat a loser

>> No.11666961

>>11666887
>Doesn't seem to matter, as long as I have my immense intellect and my stellar good looks it wouldn't bother me either way.
But the OP of your thread seemed to be saying mens lives are worse, or not as free or powerful, why would you not mind being such then?