[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 2 KB, 163x209, 1485220337131.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11637127 No.11637127 [Reply] [Original]

Let me get this straight ... you don't like Jordan Peterson ... but you've never read anything he has ever wrote?

Wow.

>> No.11637151

>>11637127
Seems to me to be used by social autocrats to gain more power ; as if they had authority

>> No.11637157

>>11637127
Let me get this straight...you don't like Marx...but you've never read anything he has wrote?

>> No.11637162

I watched a speech he gave. He sounded like an assertive crackpot

>> No.11637163

>>11637127
I don't read youtubers.

>> No.11637181

do you really think anyone here has the brains or the autonomy to dislike something if they actually read about it?

>> No.11637204

>>11637162
Which means he is, objectively.

>> No.11637573

Let's just bump this baby

>> No.11637736

>>11637163
/thread

>> No.11637740

Let me get this straight ... you love Jordan Peterson ... but you've never read anything he has ever wrote?

Wow.

>> No.11637742

>>11637127
>Don't like somebody
>Haven't read them
What's wrong with this? It seems perfectly natural. Do you like people you haven't read, as a rule?

>> No.11637746

he's an asshole and so are his followers.
self-help charlattans disgust me.

I don't need to read anything he's ever written to find the whole peterson phenomenon pathetic

>> No.11637752

>>11637127
I read his 12 rules a little bit. Actually made me like him less.

>> No.11637784

can we get a word filter on jordan peterson already? I propose desu desu or wash you're penis

>> No.11637787

>>11637784
How about 'Haha.' like he used it in his 12 rules of life after some cheesy joke he made.

>> No.11637930

>>11637787
Haha.

>> No.11637940

Filtering this sad cunt, cya

>> No.11637951

I dislike like him because Harold Bloom told me he was bad.

>> No.11638322

>>11637127
I said I didn't like him, not that I didn't like his books

>> No.11638606

Let me get this straight ... you don't like Hillary Clinton ... but you've never read anything he has ever wrote?

Wow.

>> No.11638835

>>11638606
Neither has anyone who's ever read her books lmao

>> No.11638860

>>11637127
thats because he only wrote a book
and i dont need rules to live

>> No.11638865

>>11637127
Hes never written anything on philosophy or half the things he rants about

You've never look into his works, have you?

>> No.11638891

>>11638865
Maps of Meaning doesn't come across as having philosophical implications to you?

>> No.11638904

Read maps of meaning before commenting.

>> No.11638906

>>11637127
the most absolute dogshit trip to curse this site in years
just stop posting if you can't graduate from the fucking dunce box
saged

>> No.11638918

>>11638904
But now only I can comment, what have you done, rescind this post otherwise the whole board will freeze in place!

>> No.11638964

Is-ought
Peterson is ded

>> No.11639506

>>11637163
>>11637736
>college professor makes a YouTube video
>he is now defined primarily as a youtuber
Wtf?

>> No.11639518

>>11637742
Youre implying that you must either like or dislike something you haven't read. Why cant you just have no opinion of it? Or if you do have a prejudicial opinion of it, not announce with the utmost confidence?

>> No.11639523

>>11637746
>hes an asshole
>I've never read anything hes written
OP wins again

>> No.11639529

>>11637127
Another leftypol bait thread.

>> No.11639551

He hates postmodernists and marxist without ever doing any research on them so I don't see why I couldn't do the same to him desu

>> No.11639559

>>11637127
His most important work at this point is public speaking so I don't see why reading would be a requirement for "not liking Jordan Peterson."

>> No.11639715

>>11639551
What quote from him would you like to challenge on either of those subjects?

>> No.11639768

>>11639518
I made no such assumption, in fact the OP made that exact assumption, and that was my point.

>> No.11639790
File: 23 KB, 479x317, 1482510748902.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11639790

>>11639768
The assumption was made with intent to demonstrate your lack of capacity for sophisticated introspection to a degree which would allow you to illicit cognitive dissonance upon being presented with an opportunity to either admit you don't understand someone who's ideas you espouse in stupid mockery, or actually read the arguments being put forth, from the author.

>> No.11639833

Can you post your female feet, December?

>> No.11639835
File: 673 KB, 786x818, jbp3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11639835

the stupid man's smart person, funded and promulgated by none other than the (((tribe.))) hmmmmm

>> No.11639845

>>11639790
>who’s

>> No.11639848

>>11639790
Problem is I don't mock Peterson's views. I don't even know his views, and I haven't watched his videos. I just like triggering tripfagging, brain dead retards, and it looks like everyone else does too