/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.11623034]

Is he, dare I say it, /ourguy/?

[Anonymous No.11623059]

>>11623034
I watch his videos on the rare occasions he uploads. Seems to be a well read and consistent chap

[Anonymous No.11623062]

Fuck off faggot your videos are gay

[Anonymous No.11623073]

>>11623034
No, but he certainly beats the Paul Joseph Watsons of the web.

[Anonymous No.11623076]

Loved the K-Pop late capitalism video

[Anonymous No.11623079]

>>11623034
He is what he says he is: a cuck. Not surprised he seems to think that women are equal.

[Anonymous No.11623084]

Hated the K-Pop late capitalism video

[Anonymous No.11623091]

He is what he says he is: a philosopher. Not surprised he seems to think equality is a vague and useless political goal.

[Anonymous No.11623092]

>>11623076
Exactly. I've just watched it and it was immensely entertaining and enlightening.

[Anonymous No.11623098]

>>11623034
Yes. There’s a 100% chance he’s stopped by here before.

[Anonymous No.11623103]

>>11623098
what if I told you that he's the OP shilling his own channel

[Anonymous No.11623111]

>>11623103
The image says 'inscritos', Cuck Philosophy is American.

[Anonymous No.11623124]

>>11623091
Only equality in an abstract, general, formalistic sense.

[Anonymous No.11623131]

>>11623111
couldn't he simply change youtube's language or abuse paint.exe to swindle us?

[Anonymous No.11623137]

>>11623131
devilish, almost tao lin-tier

[Anonymous No.11623142]

>>11623034
>Hegelian
>Marxist
No.

[Anonymous No.11623154]

>>11623034
He's only a slightly less cringy version of Existential Coms so hard pass

[Anonymous No.11623225]

>>11623034
we are still waiting for /ourguy/

only an /ourguy/ can save us

[Anonymous No.11623260]

>>11623225
He'll become our Fanthano if he starts reviewing fiction.

[Anonymous No.11623266]

Presenting the struggle between Sonic and Shadow through the lens of Kant with 0 irony attached is pretty gay.

[Anonymous No.11623271]

itt: buttmad /pol/ nazis

[Anonymous No.11623778]

>>11623266
His channel is literally called "Cuck Philosophy", it's designed to be as gay as possible

[Anonymous No.11623828]

>>11623225
The Milwaukee Minotaur is ourguy and you can't change my mind on this one

[Anonymous No.11623833]

>>11623260
That would be awful. Melon almost singlehandedly ruined /mu/

[Anonymous No.11623860]

Why does he call himself a cuck?

[Anonymous No.11623869]

Was Fourier a cuck?

[Anonymous No.11623881]

>>11623034
Some of his videos aren't bad but the name is really stupid.

[Anonymous No.11623899]

>>11623076
held off on watchingthat video after seeing their shrek analysis that was pretty contrived, but the kpop one was p good

[Anonymous No.11624096]

>>11623034
The definition of a sophist. He sets up his videos with a pre-achieved conclusion and just walks us to them through contrived usage of basic concepts of philosophers whose dogma he follows. Cuck Philosophy is just that, cuck philosophy, the philosophy of the regurgitator, the follower, he suckles semen out of Hegel's cockles (or whoever else) and records himself spitting it up onto whatever his current "subject" happens to be.

He is perfectly uncontroversial within polite, educated society. Everything he says reaffirms hegemonic discourse. Those who watch his videos either listen to him for the smug satisfaction of hearing "their" beliefs spoken into their ears, or because they are even lower and more cucked than he is and so they quickly leap in to lap up daddy's cummies off the floor after they've dribbled out the Cuck's mouth. Cuck Philosophy is a #niceguy and a #goodboy, he has all the right opinions in the right ways, please give him a pat on the head.

Should be named Cuck Credo, as philosophy is something very different from what he performs. The man is a disgrace, but it's not his fault—he is simply a mirror held up to the base discourse of the times. Validation-seeking cucks should be ignored.

So yeah, he is /ourguy/, given that most /lit/ posters and Cuck Philosophy share the same ignorance and drive for acceptance.

[Anonymous No.11624135]

>>11624096

Damn dude don't cut yourself on that edge

[Anonymous No.11624164]

>>11624135
Go make another video where no one learns anything but everyone gets to feel a communal sense of smug superiority

[Anonymous No.11624178]

>>11624164
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.11624219]

>>11624178
I kind of doubt that you have fans that care this much about your work, given they're made up entirely of people who would dispose of you in an instant should you slip up, and limp-wristed faggots who would most likely jump in to decry you should anyone slander your name.

You put yourself in the position of anonymously defending yourself. It is the only defense you will get. It's what happens when your audience is nothing but cucks learning to grovel and the neo-aristocracy in front of whom you grovel, like some kind of Catholic idol of cuckery.

[Anonymous No.11624242]

Jesus is my nigga.

[Anonymous No.11624287]

>>11623271
t. faggot

[Anonymous No.11624290]

>>11623860
probably one of those "you can't own me if I own myself" kind of things

[Anonymous No.11624296]

>*blocks your path*

[Anonymous No.11624303]

>>11623034
His recent Hegel/Incel video was terrible. Just plain wrong.

[Anonymous No.11624364]

>>11624290
It's pretty, well, cucked, to do that. Makes sense he'd make this thread.

[Anonymous No.11624421]

No, this is /ourguy/

[Anonymous No.11624433]

>>11624096
Of course he does, he is following a script. Do you even know how video recording works?

[Anonymous No.11624545]

>>11624421

[Anonymous No.11624558]

I just watched all of his videos
A lot of them are deeply interesting but a lot of what he says I disagree with and think is flawed
His whole incel video is arguing in bad faith essentially because of how he approaches the topic i.e. he tries to put them in the position of the master (since he is a Marxist this comes with some negative connotations) when it is much more likely that any given incel will feel they are the slave in the current dynamic, nor does he attempt to address social capital as an idea, one which incels are transitioning towards as their movement grows. Although I will admit, his overall premise of using the Hegelian model to show that incels' desires necessarily negate their anger and vice versa. Made me think but got a lot of details wrong in my opinion. Thinking about trying to clarify into my own thoughts.

[Anonymous No.11624583]

>>11623076
The USA has literally the same shit.

[Anonymous No.11624598]

>>11623034
Is it another one of those "hehe kiddos, I bet you never heard of leftist theory before, get read for some dangerous thinking"?