Derrida, Marcuse, Roland Barthes, Deleuze,Lacan and Foulcault

[Anonymous No.11563422]

Did you read any of these 6 black-belts of thought?
Can you recommend some of their work?(if you have read it)

[Anonymous No.11563810]

>>11563422
Lacan and Foucault are the only ones worth reading, and they still have their problems. The rest are literal gutter trash.

[Anonymous No.11563942]

>>11563810
Barthes is precious take it back slut.

[Anonymous No.11563973]

>>11563810
Some of Derrida is godlike (Donner la mort, De la grammatologie, Marges de la philosophie)

All of Deleuze is worth reading.

[Anonymous No.11563977]

>>11563810
They are all good, you filthy pleb

[Anonymous No.11564028]

>>11563422
where's the Althusser? Baudrillard?

[Anonymous No.11564035]

>>11563422
Blanchot, Bataille and Klossowski are all you need.

[Anonymous No.11564037]

>for each French philosopher you have to find his German buddy

[Anonymous No.11564056]

>>11563810
>>11563973
Tell me more about them. Which works to start with?

>>11564035
>Bataille
What? He sucks as a writer

>>11564037
Care to recommend them?

[Anonymous No.11564072]

>>11564056
Freud for Lacan, Nietzsche for Deleuze and Fugo, Heidegger for Derrida, Freud and Marx for Marcuse, marx freud and neech for barthes

[Anonymous No.11564073]

>Bataille
I'm 1/3 through Erotism and the language feels like it's overstepping it's bounds waaaaaay too far past the material; it reads like mystical metaphysics and it all feels like a load of BS. Can someone help? I'm plan on finishing it but I feel like I'm missing something.

[Anonymous No.11564076]

>>11564073
Also his syntax is shitty and ornamental I hate it

[Anonymous No.11564095]

>>11564072
They are more like their predecessors