[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 29 KB, 666x390, the real question.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11475274 No.11475274 [Reply] [Original]

I'm too stupid to get this on my own, /lit/. Tell me, which one is right and how do I shill that stance to look smart?

>> No.11475304

>>11475274
Neither are really right but Searle is more on point

>> No.11475308

>>11475304
>muh causal powers

>> No.11475309

>>11475304
Who do you think is right then ?

>> No.11475315

>>11475274
Right? About what? Bad start to a thread anon.

>> No.11475328

>>11475274
About what?
Not that it matters, the answer is most likely Searle because at least his reading of Wittgenstein is in the realm of acceptability, whereas Dennett misunderstands him so badly I doubt his ability to reason properly about anything.

>> No.11475330
File: 21 KB, 324x450, 26ABB341-8BDA-43AA-A796-A0FB165F42B3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11475330

Uh, try this guy, sweetie~

>> No.11475340
File: 63 KB, 924x560, 1527237033767.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11475340

>>11475330

>> No.11475454

>>11475328
>whereas Dennett misunderstands him so badly I doubt his ability to reason properly about anything.
How?

>> No.11475974

>>11475308
I think he's right about this but formulates it horribly.

>> No.11476703

lol Sarle

>> No.11477994

>>11475274
They're both wrong.
t. panpsychist

>> No.11478005

Dennett looks like like an old pedophile.

>> No.11478016

Literally who and literally whom

>> No.11478037

>>11475330
complete retard. If he was born in the 20th century he'd be deep in pomo.

>> No.11478047

>>11478037
He doesn't really care what you think, too busy beholding the beatific vision until he receives his glorified body at the last judgment.